Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

My 17months old son has always had a very strong personality - but in the last few weeks his insistence of "my way or the highway" has reached new extremes! He is as sweet as can be - as long as he gets his way, always. Obviously, that is not an option and we are being firm about saying no & acting on it, too.

But I wonder how much of the boundry setting he can actually understand? I know he does understand if "threat" and action are immediately linked - e.g. when I tell him not to bang a toy on the table and he keeps doing it, I tell him that I'll take it away - and he appears to understand that concept (and I take it away if he carries on regardless). But when we are out & he throws a strop, saying that we'll go home - he does not appear to realise that his behaviour is linked to the going home... What do others think/ have experienced?

Secondly - how to deal with the actual tantrum? I've read to ignore the tantrum until it's passed, then offer cuddles etc - but it sometimes appears that he gets himself so much in a tantrum that he does not know how to "switch" off, i.e. to get himself out of the hysterics - what are good approaches to help him?

Any wise thoughts (and amusing stories???) would be appreciated :)

mx

Fuschia posted this link a while ago about tantrums:http://m.npr.org/story/143062378?url=/blogs/health/2011/12/05/143062378/whats-behind-a-temper-tantrum-scientists-deconstruct-the-screams . It made a lot of sense to me.


From this thread: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,854520,854745#msg-854745

thanks for the reminder, Saffron - I now remember reading this at the time...


"tantrums are no different than thunderstorms or other natural phenomena" - well, they certainly feel like it in this house!

Any suggestions on how much a toddler at that age can understand about behaviour and consequences?

Hi Mima,


And like natural phenomena I think tantrums are sometimes inevitable AND nothing to do with your parenting. IMO at 17 months your child is pretty much still a baby and the boundary setting stuff is lost on him. I firm 'no' might work but 'if you do this...this will happen' is too much for him at the moment.


My best tips to avoid melt downs are avoiding hunger and tiredness and get online to do your shop!

Reading an interesting book called Letting Go As Children Grow by Deborah Jackson (of Three In A Bed fame). on the toddler years, she posits that until children are 3, there is very little point in trying to discipline them as they can't understand. They act on intent, not volition, and have no impulse control.


As Claire says, I try to avoid hunger and tiredness, and remind myself that he isn't trying to give me a hard time, he is having a hard time. Now he's nearly two and rapidly gaining language skills, the meltdowns are fewer and farther between as he can tell us what he wants and doesn't get so frustrated.

I think you have to keep reassessing all the time - Miss Oi has good language skills and I think sometimes I make the mistake of upping her understanding skills because of it - then realizing I'm not being fair with my expectations of her behaviour, which is becoming increasingly more wilful, shall we say . . . ! I know it's all testing the boundaries etc - but I wish she'd test someone else's sometimes!


(btw, has anyone else lost their edit function, to use itals or bold or whatever?)

Oimissus I agree about reassessing all the time (and yes now that you say it, my formatting buttons have gone too). We had fairly mild tantrums (or maybe just frustration fits) that often ended quite quickly if I would hold our girls very tightly, like a strong hug, saying sweet reassuring words and trying to distract them after a while. But maybe they weren't real tantrums so I'm not sure if this would work.

Hiya, thanks for the posts. I agree on the reassessing - and he certainly understands that some of his actions have reactions (testing, testing, and - again testing). He amazes me sometimes with the things he does understand (like when I tell him that he has to wait before going out because I have to put my shoes on - he turns, hands me my shoe & starts off to the door) but I am sure I'm guilty of expecting too much. Thanks for the reassurance - I did think more complex forms of disciplining (like going home when he is having a tantrum)were too early - just wanted to hear what others are doing. Come on those language skills!

mx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...