Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

My 17months old son has always had a very strong personality - but in the last few weeks his insistence of "my way or the highway" has reached new extremes! He is as sweet as can be - as long as he gets his way, always. Obviously, that is not an option and we are being firm about saying no & acting on it, too.

But I wonder how much of the boundry setting he can actually understand? I know he does understand if "threat" and action are immediately linked - e.g. when I tell him not to bang a toy on the table and he keeps doing it, I tell him that I'll take it away - and he appears to understand that concept (and I take it away if he carries on regardless). But when we are out & he throws a strop, saying that we'll go home - he does not appear to realise that his behaviour is linked to the going home... What do others think/ have experienced?

Secondly - how to deal with the actual tantrum? I've read to ignore the tantrum until it's passed, then offer cuddles etc - but it sometimes appears that he gets himself so much in a tantrum that he does not know how to "switch" off, i.e. to get himself out of the hysterics - what are good approaches to help him?

Any wise thoughts (and amusing stories???) would be appreciated :)

mx

Fuschia posted this link a while ago about tantrums:http://m.npr.org/story/143062378?url=/blogs/health/2011/12/05/143062378/whats-behind-a-temper-tantrum-scientists-deconstruct-the-screams . It made a lot of sense to me.


From this thread: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,854520,854745#msg-854745

thanks for the reminder, Saffron - I now remember reading this at the time...


"tantrums are no different than thunderstorms or other natural phenomena" - well, they certainly feel like it in this house!

Any suggestions on how much a toddler at that age can understand about behaviour and consequences?

Hi Mima,


And like natural phenomena I think tantrums are sometimes inevitable AND nothing to do with your parenting. IMO at 17 months your child is pretty much still a baby and the boundary setting stuff is lost on him. I firm 'no' might work but 'if you do this...this will happen' is too much for him at the moment.


My best tips to avoid melt downs are avoiding hunger and tiredness and get online to do your shop!

Reading an interesting book called Letting Go As Children Grow by Deborah Jackson (of Three In A Bed fame). on the toddler years, she posits that until children are 3, there is very little point in trying to discipline them as they can't understand. They act on intent, not volition, and have no impulse control.


As Claire says, I try to avoid hunger and tiredness, and remind myself that he isn't trying to give me a hard time, he is having a hard time. Now he's nearly two and rapidly gaining language skills, the meltdowns are fewer and farther between as he can tell us what he wants and doesn't get so frustrated.

I think you have to keep reassessing all the time - Miss Oi has good language skills and I think sometimes I make the mistake of upping her understanding skills because of it - then realizing I'm not being fair with my expectations of her behaviour, which is becoming increasingly more wilful, shall we say . . . ! I know it's all testing the boundaries etc - but I wish she'd test someone else's sometimes!


(btw, has anyone else lost their edit function, to use itals or bold or whatever?)

Oimissus I agree about reassessing all the time (and yes now that you say it, my formatting buttons have gone too). We had fairly mild tantrums (or maybe just frustration fits) that often ended quite quickly if I would hold our girls very tightly, like a strong hug, saying sweet reassuring words and trying to distract them after a while. But maybe they weren't real tantrums so I'm not sure if this would work.

Hiya, thanks for the posts. I agree on the reassessing - and he certainly understands that some of his actions have reactions (testing, testing, and - again testing). He amazes me sometimes with the things he does understand (like when I tell him that he has to wait before going out because I have to put my shoes on - he turns, hands me my shoe & starts off to the door) but I am sure I'm guilty of expecting too much. Thanks for the reassurance - I did think more complex forms of disciplining (like going home when he is having a tantrum)were too early - just wanted to hear what others are doing. Come on those language skills!

mx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...