Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For parents and carers who are concerned, there is a new campaign to bring change to the harmful level of pollution in the air near Southwark's schools.


The entire borough of Southwark, except for the area to the south of the A205, has been declared an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA). This means the area has been identified as being particularly polluted, largely due to heavy traffic.


Exposure to high levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution affects the function of lungs, especially in children and increased hospital admissions occur in areas with high levels of nitrogen dioxide. The main concentrations of nitrogen dioxide are around busy roads, and there are 48 schools in Southwark within 150m of busy roads.


The Green Party will be calling for the council to take steps to protect people from pollution by:

* reducing traffic near these schools

* helping the schools to protect their students, e.g. by planting absorbant bushes and trees alongside roads and by incorporating pollution into school travel plans

* issuing smog alerts to schools and parents on particularly bad days

* encouraging teachers to measure air pollution with children as science projects


Come to an important council meeting to discuss this problem and start action - this Wed eve 4th July in Southwark . Details on Southwark Green Party website, or on GreenPartySouthwark Twitter. OR call 07914 425 378

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24238-air-quality-around-schools/
Share on other sites

"The main concentrations of nitrogen dioxide are around busy roads, and there are 48 schools in Southwark within 150m of busy roads."


We're in central London. I find it difficult to believe that close to 100% of schools are not within 150m of a busy road.


Apart from the first point, which would be best solved by banning parents from driving their kids to school (but that would, of course, go down like the proverbial lead balloon), none of the other ideas I don't believe would actually meet the goal of protecting people from pollution.

Have to say, this would be my key concern about an otherwise excellent school like Goose Green. From when I walk past there on a regular basis I have never seen any green space there at all, all just concreted over. Also don't know why so many people in E.D. seem to feel the need to drive at all, and especially SUV's, this is zone 2 people!

Sadly, I don't think that any of the state schools in ED have grassy fields/playgrounds. Goose Green school does however have a green screen of absorbent bushes and trees, a lovely wildlife garden, vegetable patch, gardening club, mini beast mansion and basically does everything it can to encourage an understanding of and love of nature within the constraints of the building.


Cyberia, if you ever get the chance to come into the school come and take a look at the nursery playground which can't be seen from Grove Vale very well or from Tintagel at all. It all looks different from the inside!

I think most schools are keen to encourage children to walk to school, personally, when I can do the drop offs and pick ups it seems to me to be a really fun part of the children's day, waving to their mates and running in or out with them at the beginning and end of every day. Those who drive when they don't absolutely have to are really missing out on this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...