Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looking for some advice from the Forum re my pram dilemma.


I've currently got a Bugaboo bee which I love, and so does my 2-year-old. We also have a maclaren that lives in the car, not in love with it but it's very handy for short trips, holidays etc.


We're very reluctant to get rid of the Bee and had been planning to try and get by with a sling and wheely board for the first few months, and one pram each for longer trips with both parents. However I wonder if we will end up needing a double pram eventually anyway? I'm thinking a Phil & Ted's in that case as long as it will fit into our tiny car boot.


Looking at the dimensions of the Phil & Ted's however, it's so much wider than the bee and I worry it won't fit into our shared hallway unless I fold it up which seems very impractical with a toddler and newborn in tow.


What combination have others found most useful for this age gap (just over 2 years)? I suspect my toddler would get very jealous of the baby in 'her' pram but equally, she may be really happy walking and riding on the wheeled board - impossible to know until the baby is here I suppose.


Some of my friends have all three but we simply don't have the space for this in our house.

I'd definitely try without a double at first if you're looking to save space, and you'll save money too! At least you'll have 3 options: either buggy and board, buggy and sling, or your 2 singles (with 2 adults!). Can't think of any doubles out there that are as narrow or fold up as small as the Bee, so don't fork out just yet - see how things go! You never know, your toddler might rise to the occasion and happily sacrifice her throne to the newborn! Hope all goes well x
ps - just to say need for a double totally depends on your 2 year old's character and how much walking you do!! My 3 yr old still hitches a ride on longer walks (and I sometimes need a place to imprison him!). He was just under 2 when baby 2 came along and we used a double full time for at least 6m, and then it was winter and he didn't want to walk in the cold. He also steadfastly refuses to ride on or stay on any type of buggy board (even a fancy scooter version) even now, and I find pushing prams with buggy boards on them ridiculously annoying. But I know many who have managed without - especially with girls :-)

I never really got on with a double buggy. I have a son (now 3) and a daughter (now 1) and did the sling and buggy combo for the first 2-3 months, always encouraging my 2yo to walk as far as possible before swapping the baby into the sling. Then we got a scooter for the older one. If he needed a lift on the way up big hills or anything, then he holds the side of the buggy.


I found this set up much more practical than a double buggy. I had a phil & teds sport double, and didn't like it much at all.

I bought a double buggy.. insisted on a rear and forward facing side by side (First Wheels City twin) which I love.. but very BIG.


Anyway toddler now 2 1/2 and baby 6 months and toddler insists on walking/ scootering/ riding balance bike everywhere and I have buggy board for tired journeys home.


No need for double buggy at all. It's just gathering dust in front room.


See how you get on without one as the transition from barely walking long journeys, to running along ahead of you is quick!

I'm with SB, depends very much on your child as well as how you travel. I thought that we could do it with a cheap double / sling buggy option as we would not be using it much but it didn't work. My two are 2 y 8 months and 8 weeks. We ended up buying a P & T classic and it is useful. I mainly use it for longer journeys and the nursery run.


I needed it as we live on a really busy road and I didn't always feel like I could keep a good enough grip on my daughter while she was holding my hand, we don't drive so all our journeys are on foot / bus and also I need to sometimes contain the bigger one when she is having a tantrum or refusing to walk.


The P & T is heavy and I don't love it, like I love the Bee but it does the job, has decent shopping space and it relatively nice to drive. I do find it hard getting up curbs with it, especially on hills (I live near the Horniman). Also like that it will convert to a single one day. Even though it seems massive compared to the Bee I think it is one of the narrowest doubles.


Good luck

I had intended to stick with my single buggy for my almost 3 year old (hopinghecwoud soon start walking everywhere) and put the baby in a sling....well this years weather put pay to that! A couple of disastrous attempts at going out meant tht After about 6 weeks of barely leaving the hOuse I bought a phil and teds vibe. I'm glad I did as life is much easier with the double.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...