Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?120-?250k+ depending on spec and footprint size to fully restore and convert a 4 bed terrace with loft and extension properly. If you want to slap lipstick on a pig and cut a few corners you could do it for perhaps ?90k minimum.


Or you could do it yourself if you had the time....


I now know this to be true.

Um in my experience I always end up at the high quality price so I'm looking at ?250k which is what I've budgeted for.

Extension loft new roof and a complete internal update with new wiring plumbing kitchen bathrooms redecorate some trick lighting under floor heating etc.

I just don't know if I can face all the agro.

Also there's a problem I'll spend all that money time, effort and money and the house will be worth ?100k less than its cost me, which brings us back to house price sanity at least where crappy old house prices are concerned the numbers don't add up. No wonder there aren't many high end nice houses on the mkt everyone is waiting for the prices to catch up with what they've ended up costing on that basis those houses are cheap and the crapy ones are expensive or the cost of the building work is too high for ED it's ok for multimillion pound areas we just need for prices to go higher which again would make prices appear to be cheap because it would cost the same for building work on a similar house in a cheaper area. Crazy uk prices... Make no sense.

  • 2 weeks later...

It's interesting the government are starting to discuss cash payments to tradesmen for a discount and vat avoidance.

Most tradesmen just pocket the vat.

The old do you want to pay the vat?

When they're not even vat registered and then you get a receipt which just shows a total saying "inclusive" inclusive of what? Not vat that's for sure yet you'll be billed 20% onto of the original quote.

I'm surprised the vat man and the tax man don't have a web site to report these crooks.

The uk shady building business.


Why doesn't the government just make the banks who they now "own" make all customers have a P account so that if we pay someone builders etc for services then we as the paying customer can select to pay into their P account that way the tax man would know and the tax could be collected.

A simple system which would then clean up the building trade....


On property price sanity ... All the crap houses are adjusting their prices but still nothing of any quality appearin maybe after the Olympics and summer holidays there'll be more choice, probably more ED shabby tat...

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?120-?250k+ depending on spec and footprint size

> to fully restore and convert a 4 bed terrace with

> loft and extension properly. If you want to slap

> lipstick on a pig and cut a few corners you could

> do it for perhaps ?9k minimum.

>

> Or you could do it yourself if you had the

> time....

>



I think I'll buy yours when you are finished instead. :)

Someone can lend me the money. Quids, have you won a few squids at poker recently?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Try Peckham Rye (tho still pricey) or Nunhead instead. We bought a lovely, big 4 double bedroomed house in Nunhead for ?420k back in March. Yes, it needs some work but it's structurally sound and all works. Close to the top of Peckham Rye park, close enough to East Dulwich for us to still go to the shops and pubs there. A fraction of what you would pay for a similar house in East Dul and has a lovely, peaceful feeling to the neighbourhood.
My experience of local estate agents is that some have a very limited concept of price per square foot or meter. We sold a fully renovated 3-bed terrace last year and at 130m2 many agents valued it at the standard 100m2 3-bed terrace level, meaning it was really undervalued - per square foot they were valuing it at the same level as something that needed gutting. I imagine that the Fenwick road ones are suffering this but the other way around.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps they know better than to use this

> simplistic metric in East Dulwich?

>

> John K


Simplistic price per sqm / sqft ?

As compared to 3 bed or 4 bed vague pricing ?

Sqm Sqft pricing system used in major cities all over the world including London.

It's a pricing system which allows for direct comparison and saves wasted time produces realistic pricing.

The number of shabby houses I've seen which are priced at the same level as extended renovated houses has been very frustrating.


It wouldn't be difficult to add the price per sqft figures on the particulars they manage it in Chelsea Paris even in Malaga.


In my experience the agents in ED are simple minded and very lazy.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edhistory Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps they know better than to use this

> > simplistic metric in East Dulwich?

> >

> > John K

>

> Simplistic price per sqm / sqft ?

> As compared to 3 bed or 4 bed vague pricing ?

> Sqm Sqft pricing system used in major cities all

> over the world including London.

> It's a pricing system which allows for direct

> comparison and saves wasted time produces

> realistic pricing.

> The number of shabby houses I've seen which are

> priced at the same level as extended renovated

> houses has been very frustrating.

>

> It wouldn't be difficult to add the price per sqft

> figures on the particulars they manage it in

> Chelsea Paris even in Malaga.

>


It works best in areas dominated by apartments, where most of the square footage is living space. London's Victorian houses have a lot of stairwell that confuses things. Georgian houses are even worse - all stairwell and landings with small rooms.

Pricing a domestic property based purely on sq. metreage seems slightly naive to me, it may provide some kind of mathematical basis for comparisons, but to what end I am not entirely sure.


People outside the pure investment / landlord market tend to buy with an emotional content and a consideration of aspects which a price per sq. metre does not cover, ie. how bright the rooms are, the 'feel' of the rooms, what side of the house the sun rises/sets, the way the house space is currently being used (as an indicator for how they could use it themselves).


This may explain the comment earlier in this thread that local estate agents appear to have a limited appreciation/understanding of price per square foot/metre - it's less relevant than for commercial transactions.


Businesses generally have a reqt which can be expressed with more mathematical content, based on the needs of the business and anticipated growth.


If you're using sq. metreage as your guide to 'value' you may have a frustrating experience with 'inconsistently' priced property.

That's not really a legitimate objection. Most of the houses in ED are Victorian Terraces and have similar layouts. Larger houses by sqm within this area therefore almost always have more living / bedroom space. For pricing properties within the local area its a fine metric. The issue really is deminishing utility. People aren't willing to pay that much more for a house that is larger that what they consider adequate living space. They'll pay more but not at the same price psm which is understandable.

I would say Frazer 71 is exactly right for average quality / standard layout properties. I think Friern road tends to have bigger houses and gardens in general so for a nice place the headline prices are higher but on a price psm basis fall into the upper end of that range.


Everyone is right that its not just size of the house-- size of garden, quality of layout, how modern it is makes a difference. However, for properties of similar quality in the same location the price psm data really does hold up. Buyers set the market this way even without formally doing a calculation. And while each house if unique, there is a standard / average from which each property can deviate up or down for "special / funky" features.


Also, residential developers certainly run their financial projections for schemes this way based on the quality of spec they are planning to achieve. This metric already exists in London and not just for commercial real estate transactions.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this is more like 1350 so maybe a bit more?


yes do the numbers it's very simple basic maths Estate agents really struggle with!


1,350 sq ft X ?425 = ?573,750

1,350 sq ft X ?525 = ?708,750


The difference of ?100 = ?135,000 which is probably how much it would cost to renovate the ?573,750 to get to the same standard as the ?708,750 house.


Many don't look at it that way and they end up paying more for the ?573,750 house so ending spending more than the ?708,750 but that may be down to short term affordability.

I think it's cheaper to buy a house which has been renovated at least where the electric heating plastering is concerned and just do the cheap decorating and new kitchen.

Example

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-35124844.html


3 bedroom terraced house for sale ?499,999 Nutfield Road East Dulwich needs modernising.


845 sq ft = ?589 per sq ft.

at ?100 per sq ft will cost aprox ?84,500 but the smaller the house the more per sq ft to renovate.

So will it be worth ?583,500 after spending the money?

I think there was one fully updated sold at ?560,000?

By the time you add the stamp duty and all the agro??

I'd rather buy the one at ?560,000.



It's all subjective and once my GF gets involved then I'm probably going to be driven by her more than the price.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...