Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have you ever called someone you're losing an argument to a Nazi (online or otherwise) because you or idealogy you claim allegiance to have been intellectually intimidated into a corner with no way out, other than irrelevant accusations to distract attention away from your immediate or impending defeat?


A user called Huguenot did exactly that to me in the Obama thread. Even though the Third Reich, Hitler or the Nazis couldn't be furthered removed from the discussion at hand. Seems like he had no other choice under the circumstances. Still, it's a cowardly and pathetic direction to take. Especially if it's unfounded. I feel sorry for anyone who has to resort to such irrelevant and/or unfounded accusation.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24135-calling-someone-a-nazi/
Share on other sites

Quite right saleem, because where you said...


"African American [traditional attitudes were] overridden by the opportunity to get more for less (at the expense of hard-working Americans, regardless of colour or creed)"


Wasn't a comment on genetics at all?


Or is African American not a genetic observation?


I've possibly made a terrible terrible mistake there, and what you meant was something completely different of no genetic origin?

Yes saleem sugarplum, because that's exactly what I'm doing here is it?


You think that highlighting that your bullshit claim about black people being welfare scroungers is invented is somehow patronising the black community and making them victims?


What would you like to make up next?


Can we consider a rebuttal of any other monumental bullshit to be patronsing?


I reckon that you're an inspired social commentator, but I'm sure that you wouldn't describe anyone who defended you from that unreasonable baseless insult to be patronising, no?

Ah, okay son.


It may be that you haven't watched the video. The chap was making a point about engineered victimisation.


I didn't think that lying about blacks being welfare scroungers fell into that bracket. I thought that fell into general purpose racially motivated abuse.


My mistake.

That's a rather hypocritical claim to make for someone who chose to resort to immature circle-jerking after it dawned on them that they couldn't refute uncomfortable truths by any means other than running petty distraction. Typical of your average liberal entitlement case. I bet you camped-out in front of St. Paul's in solidarity with all the other Occupy cretins.

Hello Saleem,


Subjecting an entire post code to these outpourings is not the way to go. Seriously. Some people have suggested it's boring. They're wrong. It's car crash.


Please try and find a possibility for yourself that you're living a life that impacts others in a positive way and that fulfills you. This thing that you're doing is not big, or clever, it's screaming empty. Stop it. Hugenot has upset you. Fine. I get it. Try and be bigger than your enemies, not smaller.


GG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But is it the Village councillors who are maintaining the board, or someone else? When the boards in East Dulwich were installed, it wasn't the councillors who kept the information up to date, it was Monica from Health Matters, who was greatly involved in various  community matters (eg the building of the community garden at what was then Dulwich Hospital). I can't remember if it was her who initiated the installation of the boards in the first place. She no longer lives in East Dulwich, and nobody else appears to be willing to liaise with the councillors and community related organisations  to take this on for the various East Dulwich boards.  It would hardly take much effort. Basic information doesn't frequently change (and no, I'm not volunteering. I am overstretched as it is). It's all very well to  get a physical  community notice board spruced up, but not much use if it then isn't being used for its intended purpose. And I can't see that it is part of a councillor's job to update notice boards which they didn't initiate in the first place. I'm sure they have more than enough to do.  The notice boards serve (or did do) a useful service, but all the information which could be put on them is surely available elsewhere. (Unless it is bringing to people's attention things which are of use/interest to them and they weren't aware they needed/would like, or didn't know how else to find the information). ETA: Oh. I've just read the beginning of this thread. I'd forgotten how it started. It's gone well off topic, hasn't it. Probably just as well, reading the OP.
    • The board in the Village (just near the pub) is in pristine condition, full of council-related information (though someone had stuck a flyer on the glass, now removed). Maybe the councillors there actually CBA to make use of a facility that took time, effort and taxpayers’ money to instal?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...