Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't have an electric car but I wholeheartedly support the implementation of these. If it makes it slightly more difficult to park my diesel car then I will just deal with that in the knowledge that it's a penalty for my continuing air pollution.


(I do 6000 miles a year on my bike and only about 2000 in the car so not much point in me buying an electric one right now, even with the ULEZ coming in.)

I wholehartedly support the installation of more charging points. I just think they should be distributed more widely / across different streets where possible, where the demand is (rather than in banks away from people's houses). If it's a private enterprise however, then I guess it's up to them. I can't imagine many people are going to park too far from their house though, so seems like a weird approach.

Its good to see that at least two of you support this. I expect many posting here hardly ever use their cars so would be better off using car clubs, cabs and public transport. It's happening (electrification) so get used to it. For further information here are some of the commitments from last year's Road to Zero Strategy. There will be consultation at local and national levels so you have your chance to have your say. eg https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/electric-vehicle-smart-charging and http://roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/400-million-to-bolster-uks-electric-vehicle-charging-infrastructure/


Road to Zero Strategy


26.Launching a ?400 million Charging Infrastructure Investment Fund to help accelerate charging infrastructure deployment.


27.Taking powers through the Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill to ensure:●●that chargepoints are available at motorway service areas and large fuel retailers; ●●that chargepoints are easily accessed and used across the UK. This includes powers to provide a uniform method of accessing public chargepoints and refuelling points; make certain information publicly available in an open and transparent format and set reliability standards; and ●●that chargepoints are smart ready by giving government powers to set requirements prohibiting the sale or installation of chargepoints unless they meet certain requirements.


28.Ensuring the houses we build in the coming years are electric vehicle ready. It is our intention that all new homes, where appropriate, should have a chargepoint available. We plan to consult as soon as possible on introducing a requirement for chargepoint infrastructure for new dwellings in England where appropriate.


29.Future-proofing our streets. We want all new street lighting columns to include charging points, where appropriately located, in areas with current on-street parking provision.


30.Continuing to provide grant support through the Electric Vehicle Homecharge Scheme (EVHS) until March 2019, with installations becoming smart enabled.


31.Increasing the grant level of the Workplace Charging Scheme from ?300 per socket to 75% of the purchase and installation costs of a chargepoint capped at a maximum of ?500 per socket.


32.Reviewing the provision of residential chargepoint infrastructure for those who have communal parking facilities, or do not own their own home, as part of the Law Commission?s work to review and reinvigorate the commonhold tenure in England and Wales.


33.Investing ?4.5 million in the On-street Residential Chargepoint Scheme until 2020.


34.Consulting in summer 2018 on a proposal to increase the height limit for the Permitted Development Right in England for the installation of electric vehicle chargepoints in designated off-street parking spaces.


35.Ensuring local planning policies incorporate facilities for charging electric vehicles via the National Planning Policy Framework.36.Consulting on amending Building Regulations to require relevant charging provision in new non-residential buildings.

Electric vehicles are good, but they still cause congestion. Simply replacing all our diesel/petrol/hybrid vehicles with them won't solved the pain of traffic jams and high car-pedstrian/cyclist/biker ratio. So, if you must drive, just have one or join a car club.

Can understand why they would install in a cluster as there was a lot of road digging to get the 5 i have saw being done in se24. Saying that, positioning them outside sunray park on a dead end road with no houses around is odd.

I would be interested to know how many hours they have been used, from what i have seen i would say at most one has been used for maybe a few hours in total in the last month. They are empty 99% of the time

herne hilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can understand why they would install in a cluster

> as there was a lot of road digging to get the 5 i

> have saw being done in se24. Saying that,

> positioning them outside sunray park on a dead end

> road with no houses around is odd.

> I would be interested to know how many hours they

> have been used, from what i have seen i would say

> at most one has been used for maybe a few hours in

> total in the last month. They are empty 99% of the

> time


Chicken and egg though. There aren't many electric vehicles using the chargers because overall the charging infrastructure is insufficient to support their practical use. So we need to build the infrastructure to make it easier for people to take the plunge and buy eletric cars.


(I think I also sent that message via PM for some reason oops)

I agree. People need to see the charging infrastructure in place in order to convince them that an electric car would work for them. Their use will grow incrementally. It?s really important that there are dedicated parking spaces to be able to use them. The lamppost chargers are not great as you simply cannot rely on being able to park near them when you need to charge.


However I also agree that electric cars are not the whole solution and that we need to look at reducing car use. Car clubs etc are a great idea and I?ll be seriously considering one when I don?t have car seats to lug around!


I am happy to talk to anyone considering an electric car. We live ours!

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Electric vehicles are good, but they still cause > congestion. Simply replacing all our > diesel/petrol/hybrid vehicles with them won't > solved the pain of traffic jams and high car-pedstrian/cyclist/biker ratio. So, if you must

> drive, just have one or join a car club.



Yep, even worse when incentives such as being allowed in bus lanes, no parking costs etc are brought in, peeing cyclists like me off, affecting public transport and encouraging some to switch from such cleaner/more sustainable forms of transport. Tackling climate change isn't must about switching to electric. But this is a key part of it, so get used to it.

I have a hybrid, ?9 to ?10 to charge on the dedicated Source London Points plus membership -after the first year of ?4 per month- (these points are often blocked by electric car club cars plugged in but not charging Blue City is owned by tge same French company that owns the charging points) this give an electric only range of 28-34 miles, the Ubitricity points in the street lamps for the same amount of charge cost ?2.28 via an app with no membership = no brainer. Love driving without adding to the emmissions but we are a long way from it being an easy choice and if I could rely on an electric car club vehicle being readily available would have no hesitation in not owning a car.

As for Townley Road, expect to regularly see a row of Red Blue City Electric cars more or less based there permanently, can't wait!

What sort of hybrid? A proper EV or one of those pretend ones (aka self-charging). Good to hear that you charge yours up (so it is a proper plug in one), some don't bother (business users) which is the worst of both worlds. I do like the people who put a cable across the pavement, not the way it should be done but it all counts.


https://www.ardrossanherald.com/news/17428841.beith-driver-told-by-council-that-safety-cover-for-cable-is-a-hazard/

Tatty Mum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a hybrid, ?9 to ?10 to charge on the

> dedicated Source London Points plus membership

> -after the first year of ?4 per month- (these

> points are often blocked by electric car club

> cars plugged in but not charging Blue City is

> owned by tge same French company that owns the

> charging points) this give an electric only range

> of 28-34 miles, the Ubitricity points in the

> street lamps for the same amount of charge cost

> ?2.28 via an app with no membership = no brainer.

> Love driving without adding to the emmissions but

> we are a long way from it being an easy choice and

> if I could rely on an electric car club vehicle

> being readily available would have no hesitation

> in not owning a car.

> As for Townley Road, expect to regularly see a row

> of Red Blue City Electric cars more or less based

> there permanently, can't wait!


?10 for 30 miles? That is ridiculous! That has to be twice as much as a petrol car for that mileage. Didn't realise it was such a ripoff.

that does seem quite expensive but guess you have to weigh this up with the pollution that petrol/diesel give out.

are the charging points all powered with electricity from a renewable source as if they are fossil fuel powered seems like we are going round in circles.

Indeed public charging points can be more expensive than fuel. Polar Plus is cheaper than Source London (which I only use when I would be paying for parking anyway) you get a free first year but Ubitricity sockets in lamp posts is the way to go. Yes I am an obsessive plugger-in of my PHEV otherwise what is the point? I don't have a driveway but if I did I would go pure electric.

I agree that discouraging car use is desirable (some families in my road have two cars) but the nature of my job needs me to drive late at night but if car sharing was more viable.........

The Outlander PHEV became popular with business fleets when Mitsubishi dropped the price to make it equivalent to the the diesel model when the then government grant was applied. Trouble was that some users were not plugging in meaning driving in petrol mode only - and more carbon emissions that the diesel variant defeating the whole object in terms of climate change. And there was also the issue of blocking charging bays necessarily.


Government grants are rightly moving towards subsidising infrastructure, rather than the richer people who can afford electric cars. The rest of us will have to wait for the economies of scale, or buy on the second hand market helped by the rapid fall in resale values. Some manufacturers are now get it, Volvo, VW for example. Another V, Vauxhall, want us to trade up to a standard SUV - heavier and less fuel efficient than a town car, with their ?4k scrappage scheme.


The diesel petrol argument in terms of air quality for newer vehicles is irrelevant, and direct injection petrol could be more polluting. The ULEZ will be good in one respect, older diesels where the particulate filter has either been removed or failed, The vehicles should not pass an MOT and it would be fairly easy for an enforcement officer to order the owner to get the offending vehicle checked at an MOT station or risk points. But there is little of no such enforcement.


Taking action on unnecessary idling is futile. Westminster has done sweet FA about it despite having the powers for yonks. It's a no-brainer but private and business drivers aren't bothered or don't care, including the blue light services. "Can you turn your engine off please officer! "**** ***" is the usual response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...