Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I second what Knomester said - it all depends on the shape of the baby.


Mothercare has worn well, but are huge. My 15m daughter is still in 9-12 month size. M&S more long and thin, and has also worn well. All out mothercare stuff and M&S stuff has been used by 4+ children and is still going strong. John Lewis fit my son, but not my daughter.


The only stuff that has worn out in our household is the larger sizes from Tesco and Sainsbury, and they have not stood up to crawling as the knees have worn out.

Personally, I am a huge fan of Next babygros. Hadn't bought anything from Next before and had always used John Lewis, Sainsburys or Gap ones with baby no. 1 (found GAP ones the worst of three, Sainsburys ones not great after a few washes and John Lewis ok but again, felt really thin after a few washes).


Got given some Next ones as a present for baby no.2 and haven't looked back since. Nice thickness, enforced round the sleeves so they don't roll up and no bobbles after washing. Getting some more today!

We found George/Asda plain white sleepsuits really good. Very thick, wash well and ridiculously cheap at ?4 for a 3 pack. I have some Green Baby ones that are good, particularly the winter weight ones for cold nights.


After about 12 months I couldn't face the after bath battle with a wriggling octopus child and a thousand poppers on the legs so we switched to a mixture of big boy pyjamas and a couple of Hatley sleepsuits with a long zip fastening.

I like H and M ones as they do organic cotton (?10 for 3, mix and match), and also they have a kind of ruched bottom which is great as we use cloth nappies which are larger round the bum. Do like next ones too as they are nice thick cotton, and my Mum got me some from Debenhams which have washed really well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...