Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there, just getting an early feel if there would be any interest from parents wanting/interested in having their children's walls decorated with cartoon style pictures. I will include a few pictures of walls that I have done in the past. Parents and children can give an idea of things that they are into e.g. Animals, boats, cars, sealife etc and I would come up with a sketch and if you are happy with it I could paint it onto their walls. Choldren can even paint their own pictures and they could be transferred onto the wall. I use a projector to transfer the pictures onto the walls and then paint using tester pot colours. Haven't gone far enough into it to think about prices yet as I have only done it on family members walls but I just wanted to see if it would be viable part time work as I am a stay at home mum. Ideas/comments welcome.
Great idea but as always comes down to cost. I suppose that depends on your time. If you have to go and look at everything it will end up quite expensive. Would you have a range of off the peg ideas that customers could just click on as it were? Those wanting a tailormade service with images of relatives or favourite toys or whatever could have special consultations and separate fee scheme, perhaps?

dulwichgirl2 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Great idea but as always comes down to cost. I

> suppose that depends on your time. If you have to

> go and look at everything it will end up quite

> expensive. Would you have a range of off the peg

> ideas that customers could just click on as it

> were? Those wanting a tailormade service with

> images of relatives or favourite toys or whatever

> could have special consultations and separate fee

> scheme, perhaps?


Thanks for your thoughts dulwichgirl2. I am not and do not profess to be an artist nor do i have any qualifications so i would not be charging extortionate rates. It is just a hobby that i quite enjoy doing, so far just for friends and family. It is hand painted, so as such would not be without imperfections. Depending on the scale of the design it usually takes about 2 days work. i wouldnt charge for consultation as such, just the labour and materials and as i only use tester pots (only about ?2 each) the cost is not high. It is still early days, and maybe wont come to fruition, but i just wanted to see if there would be any call for it in the area. I am a single mum, so would be fitting it around my 13 month old so would be a small scale venture!

I think it is a great idea and love the egs, especially the giraffe. I think if you could scale it, and get some efficiency in terms of product, it could be a great way to make some extra money part time.


One thought - as the baby and child stages are sadly so short, would you do it such that the customer could paint or paper over the images quite easily?

Thanks for the positive feedback! The paints I use are just emulsion tester pots so as such can be covered with two coats of white emulsion. I am very open to ideas and suggestions as I am obviously very new to the whole business side of it but was wondering whether a flat per day might be the way to go.
The only thing I would say is you can get vinyl wall decals which look similar, they are probably cheaper and also easy to remove when you change your mind. Sorry to put a downer on it, there may be people that will pay extra for something done by hand, but for something like this I wouldn't myself.
Thanks Pebbles. As I said, any theme would be possible. An initial meeting(free) would allow me to collect your preferences, ideas, input from children. I would then go off and make a sketch which you would then approve and we would arrange a day for me to come in and do it. But it's still at the idea stage at the moment. I'm just trying to garner whether there would be enough interest to make it a viable option. Thanks again for your positivity!
  • 2 weeks later...
I think it is a fab idea, my aunty is an artist so has offered to do one for us, but I think you should do a few ads (with photos )and put up in say Dulwich library, library on Grove Vale, and maybe leaflets in the park cafe and local cafes. Excellent idea for working from home. Good luck with that!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...