Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My son is nearing 3 and we'll be applying for schools next September.


I was just wondering if someone can shed light on how sibling places work? We don't own a property round here so next summer will likely rent near to our preferred school in Lambeth (we know the school we want as my son has been going to the surestart centre there since he was 6 months old). We currently live a few hundred meters outside the catchment area where we are lodging with family, however the school we want is still only 0.4 miles away from where we are now (but not close enough).


With sibling places, if we lived in the catchment area and then moved say a mile outside of the catchment a year after our son started school, is the sibling guaranteed a place, i.e. is there still a distance limit on sibling places?


Any advice appreciated as I've looked in the Lambeth schools guide and can't find an answer!


Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24021-confused-about-sibling-places/
Share on other sites

There is usually no distance limit on sibling places. My sister moved about 3 miles from her oldest son's school, but was still given a sibling place this year for her younger son. (Even though she applied to much closer schools.) I know of other people that have done the same.

Hi Lochie, if the school you are applying to is under local authority control, as most primaries are, than yes, you would get a place for a younger sibling. If however the primary is an academy or becomes an academy, be aware that academies set their own admissions criteria and may not have a sibling policy (although most currently do).


Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dear Sue, straight ahead from the sign in question. Left at Goose  Green, right at East Dulwich Grove and on to the real Dulwich.😜
    • What is wrong in getting "something for nowt", that's what inheritance in 96% of cases is. IHT is a death tax, taking 40% from those that inherited from their partner, parents, family etc. . You live in a world blinkered by your Lefty views, No doubt you were a cheer  leader for Corbin as well, oh how sad.  
    • America don't care, Biden has done this to create Trump with a major problem. And its four months since the Stooge party took office, they'll blame everything on Lammy who told Trump what he thought of him, we're on our own on this one. And would Putin strike London? Take out the Bridges from London Bridge to Vauxhall Bridge, job done, London split in two, it would be utter disruption on a grand scale and utter, utter chaos with no immediate recovery. 
    • what it all reminds me of most is the introduction of the minimum wage, and the dire predictions from vested parties But that all turned out pretty well and no-one would scrap it now would they? jazzer man - walk away from the weird websites you spend too long on. It's kinda weird "Why should ANYONE have to pay inheritance tax when the original owner has already paid tax on it." because you just got summat for nowt original owner is dead already so it's not a death tax You just don't like the idea of tax at all - so I'm not sure where money for public services would come from in your world
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...