Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am in a major quandry! We have been offered a few mornings a week at a nursery and i cant decide whether to take it up. Im worried if i dont accept i will lose the place - but we have an au pair who my son is very happy with and so dont need to send him yet to nursery. It would be good to have him established in a nursery by june when the au pair leaves - but obviously that does give plenty of time still (of i can get another place). Quite a big issue is the cost - as we dont need the childcare its added expense - but bigger issue is whether it would be good for my son to start in sept. he will be 2 in october so part of me thinks he is still young and getting more out of adult relationships at the moment than needing to play with other kids (and he does a lot of playgroup type activity and plays well with others already). But by the time he's 2 will he need the stimulation of a more structured environment with lots of activities? He is a sociable child and i think would adjust to nursery - just cant decide whether he needs it just yet...i wonder what experences people have in terms of when their kids started nursery and what their experiences were? need to decide by today - so difficult - i keep changing my mind!!

I don't think there is an objective "best age" for boys to start nursery - so much will depend on them, on you, on your family circumstances, and on the nursery environment that it really is horses for courses like susyp says. I think there's quite a bit of scientific research out there on boys and nurseries in particular but like so much research we all have a tendency to cherry pick what supports our own particular viewpoint.


For what it's worth, the yaklet went to nursery full time at 9 months old. He's having a whale of a time.

My little girl started at 18 months (just under). I would have preferred to send her at 2 (her brother started nursery when he was 2) but the nursery only does one in-take in September so she wouldn't have been able to go until she was closer to 2.5. She does two full days and absolutely loves it. The rest of the time she is looked after by my au pair (our au pairs are friends btw), so a good mixture between an adult carer at home and nursery. Personally I don't think 2 is too young, both my children got a lot out of nursery at that age, my eldest still loves popping in to say hi!

When I tried my daughter at 2 I have to say there were about 20 that were absolutely fine straight off and about 5 that weren't (including my daughter) - and even then I think the other 4 stuck at it and became fine. Just depends what you want to do really. It would be fine at 2 even if you had some difficulties initially , I just couldn't swallow the pill initially - and was glad I did this when she waltzed in to her school nursery at 3 with no problems. No right or wrong - just do what you want to do I think - he won't miss out not going at 2, plenty of time!

Susypx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...