Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KK Originally scheduled on 18th by whom? Or is

> this a joke about bus latemess?


I was being serious - it was originally being balloted for the 18th.. altho I can see the potential humour attached.


saleem I don't think it wise for you to make such comments... rocket scientists are frowned upon in ED

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23992-bus-strike/#findComment-553311
Share on other sites

They didnt vote on a date! They voted on Striking I cant find any reference to 18th.


Members of the Unite union supported industrial action by a ratio of more than nine to one, on a 38% turnout. The union is seeking the bonus, which will cost ?14m, for the 20,000 bus workers it represents, claiming that all other transport workers are being paid a premium for working during the event. At least 800,000 extra passengers are predicted on buses during the Olympics.


The ballot allows the union to name a date for a strike, but it has yet to do so. Unite said it was giving the 21 bus companies a final opportunity to consider the "landslide" ballot result before announcing possible strike dates early this week.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23992-bus-strike/#findComment-553316
Share on other sites

It's definitely been called and it starts at 3am this Friday. It's the first London-wide bus strike for 30-odd years and it involves 20-plus operators so it is difficult to predict how many buses will run.


Some of the operators are also likely to try and get an injunction to prevent it, so obviously the success or otherwise of this will affect its impact.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23992-bus-strike/#findComment-553337
Share on other sites

I can really see bus drivers running the St. Hellier routes getting blasted away by the Olympic traffic.


Some of those boys in Canons Park aren't going to even know what hit them once the Olympic hordes crash in on suburban North West London.


Thank heavens the unions are there to protect them. They're being absolutely stitched up by Boris Komolakoff - the one Olympic visitor who mistakenly happened to make a 100 yard bus journey on his single afternoon trip to visit the grave of a long lost relative.


They deserve every penny these bus drivers. Boris was hard work he was. They're not on the gravy train at all.


Five hundred quid isn't nearly enough.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23992-bus-strike/#findComment-553355
Share on other sites

So what will the strike cost an average bus driver in wages? A touch over ?100 by my estimate.


Their ?500 is now worth less than ?400. If they get it. Another strike will chip even more off it.


Striking for an extra ongoing pay rise has a cost/benefit. This just seems like union muscle flexing, which probably explains the low turnout.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23992-bus-strike/#findComment-553398
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why, because the 20,000 London bus drivers out of 24,000 in total that will never see an Olympic

> passenger deserve an extra 500 quid for all their hard work?


Actually, given the amount of pre-games work done by London companies to mitigate games traffic issues, most bus drivers will probably see less passengers. Perhaps they should dock all drivers ?100 (since they'll have less of a workload) and redistribute the money to those on the busy side of town?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23992-bus-strike/#findComment-553401
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...