Jump to content

computer repairs


RussSE15

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

Captain Marvel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe these folk

>

> http://www.netquest-consulting.com/


I used this guy once and he tried to get photos off my computer (didn't try very hard) but failed and charged me a lot for doing basically not very much.


Would not recommend.


I've used Pavel at UK Computers in the past but lost their number :(

EDmummy101 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I used this guy once and he tried to get photos

> off my computer (didn't try very hard) but failed

> and charged me a lot for doing basically not very

> much.

>


What did he do?


> Would not recommend.

>

> I've used Pavel at UK Computers in the past but

> lost their number :(


His number (078..783) findable here last appeared in 2013 and seems to be no longer in use.

If your in the older age bracket join the Dulwich U3A - we have groups that will help you master Apple, Windows and Android devices - also lots of other interest groups that meet regularly throughout Dulwich - from Archaeology to Zumba - only ?20 for a whole year

Have a look on the groups tab at

Www.dulwich-u3a.uk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • If you want to look for blame, look at McKinsey's. It was their model of separating cost and profit centres which started the restructuring of the Post Office - once BT was fully separated off - into Lines of Business - Parcels; Mail Delivery and Retail outlets (set aside the whole Giro Bank nonsense). Once you separate out these lines of business and make them 'stand-alone' you immediately make them vulnerable to sell off and additionally, by separating the 'businesses' make each stand or fall on their own, without cross subsidy. The Post Office took on banking and some government outsourced activity - selling licences and passports etc. as  additional revenue streams to cross subsidize the postal services, and to offer an incentive to outsourced sub post offices. As a single 'comms' delivery business the Post Office (which included the telcom business) made financial sense. Start separating elements off and it doesn't. Getting rid of 'non profitable' activity makes sense in a purely commercial environment, but not in one which is also about overall national benefit - where having an affordable and effective communications (in its largest sense) business is to the national benefit. Of course, the fact the the Government treated the highly profitable telecoms business as a cash cow (BT had a negative PSBR - public sector borrowing requirement - which meant far from the public purse funding investment in infrastructure BT had to lend the government money every year from it's operating surplus) meant that services were terrible and the improvement following privatisation was simply the effect of BT now being able to invest in infrastructure - which is why (partly) its service quality soared in the years following privatisation. I was working for BT through this period and saw what was happening there.
    • But didn't that separation begin with New Labour and Peter Mandelson?
    • I am not disputing that the Post Office remains publicly owned. But the Lib Dems’ decision to separate and privatise Royal Mail has fatally undermined the PO.  It is within the power of the Labour government to save what is left of the PO and the service it provides to the community, if they care enough; I suspect they do not.  However, the appalling postal service is a constant reminder of the Lib Dems’ duplicity on this matter. It is actions taken under the Lib Dem / Conservative coalition that have brought us to this point.
    • Hello We are looking for a stroller lightweight pushchair to use on holidays etc. Our son is 18 months. Anyone looking to sell one? Thanks! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...