Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On lookout Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As my original message stated I have seen this

> nanny on a few occasions in different places,

> which is why I said whenever I see her she always

> looks unhappy.



She's probably frowning and thinking "Why is this woman following me? I see her everywhere!"

:))


absentminded Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On lookout Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > As my original message stated I have seen this

> > nanny on a few occasions in different places,

> > which is why I said whenever I see her she

> always

> > looks unhappy.

>

>

> She's probably frowning and thinking "Why is this

> woman following me? I see her everywhere!"

What the title says. Is this what we call a good nanny?

I had asked for replys from nannies and parents so I would also get some opinions from both sides of the fence to avoid this being a one sided parent topic. There has been some very helpful and honest reply's without being offensive.

From my experiences, most people working in childcare are extremly kind, truly love their little charges and get paid very little for what is a very tiresome job. If you are worried about having to rely on just the one person (which is after all a legitimate concern), I would give nurseries a go if I were you.

I work as a nanny looking after two young children. I love my job and the children I look after mean a lot to me. We do have fun together, play time, cuddle time and so on as well as times when I have to be strict and firm. There are times when I have the 18 months old in the push chair and the 3 year old wanting me to pull her scooter with her on it whilst pushing the buggy- hmmmm, just explaining that you cant do it to a 3 year old is like talking to the air because the only thing I get in return is a loud cry, I mean very loud and a dramatic tantrum as well as dirty looks from strangers giving you this "bad nanny look" without obviously knowing the reason/s why I have a screaming toddler by my side. The funny thing is that the moment we get into the house, she acts like nothing ever happened and goes off to play.


It's very easy to judge people, I'm sure she is a good nanny but unfortunately you only see her when the child is playing up. The fact that you still see her around means her employers are obviously happy with her!! I really think you should mind your business and just hope/pray you find a good nanny..

I reported the previous thread and I'm glad it was pulled pretty smartly.


Let's get one thing clear. You. Don't. Know. If. This. Woman. Is. A. Nanny. She could be a mother, an aunt, a friend. You actually know jack-sh*t about her, but appear to be prepared to come on to a public forum, try to identify her, and bash her for what you consider to be her failings as a nanny.


If you are genuinely looking for a nanny I suggest you request to get this thread removed, and look for another way to go about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...