Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have seen a nanny looking after two children around the East Dulwich area one is a baby and the other around 3/4 years of age. Whenever I see this nanny she never looks happy and fails to show much affection to the children and her discipline methods seem a little regimental.

A few weeks ago whilst I was in Dulwich park, I saw this nanny pushing her charge away when the little girl wanted a cuddle.

This may well have been a case of the nanny having a day or the child misbehaving but at what point is classed as over stepping the mark?


I am returning back to work in a few months time and we will be needing a nanny but my worry is, will that be my child while I am at work.

I welcome the opinions of nannies and parents please.


Onthelookout

I knew she was a nanny because the older child was calling her by name.

I might add the title of this subject was 'is this what we call a good nanny' therefor I am not taring every nanny with the same brush. There are many others I have seen which do a great loving and caring for the child/children.

My son often calls me Ruth, not Mum. Dunno why, it's just one of his things.


I understand your concern, I think. My advice would be to interview as many potential nannies as you can and go by your gut feeling. I was meant to go back to work in September, when my two would have been 2y10mo and 14mo, but whilst all the nannies we interviewed had excellent references and were no doubt caring, experienced and lovely, I couldn't find one on my wavelength, and knew I wouldn't be 100% happy returning to work until I could find thr perfect match. So I'm not going back. Poverty, here we come...

Sometimes 3 year olds need a bit of encouragement to leave the playground/go to the next activity/do as they are told. They may use 'wanting a cuddle/needing a lift up etc' to delay/try to be in charge etc. A non-smiling woman pushing baby out of playground hoping mischievious toddler will follow (after half an hour trying to persuade her its home time) sounds like me on many a day. In fact, thinking about it, I'm sure a professional would have better tactics for dealing with this and get far less stressed/miserable about it!

Urgh, if that's the nanny, what are the parents like?


Sounds like she might not have much training in childcare. Maybe she is a neighbour or relative, not really trained for the role, if you see what I mean? Personally, I'd hope that if I were paying someone with a background in childcare/child development to care for child, then I'd expect her to actually care for my child.


The caveat is that you need to be very clear with your nanny about what you expect. Maybe what you observed is the discipline or interaction that the parents consider normal or acceptable. It's not the way I'd expect for our family, but everyone's different.


We did have one temporary nanny who didn't integrate well into our family. She was a caring, thoughtful person, but she prioritised differently than we do. Specifically, she was leaving my daughter to cry herself to sleep for naps, b/c she prioritised sleep over crying. That's not the way I was doing it, so we quickly had to come to a different arrangement, as her method rapidly resulted in a heap of night time sleep problems for us.


I just offer it as an example of how a caring, well-meaning person can be doing the wrong thing for your family without really realising it. So, when you're looking for a nanny, you need to be clear with him/her from the beginning what style of parenting suits your family.


Have you thought about speaking in a friendly way to the women you saw, to find out what her situation is? Maybe you're just generally catching them at a bad time of day. I know it happens with me and Little Saff too sometimes.

If she really is a nanny, definitely not a good one. I agree with Ruth. You have to meet as many as possible and go with your gut feeling. As in every job, you get good ones and you get bad ones. We have a wonderful nanny that I got to know very well during my maternity leave so that could be an option to consider? I.e. starting with your nanny on a par time basis before returning to work.


I have seen awful nannies but equally some wonderful ones in te parks, play groups etc. If you find the right person, it can be an amazing childcare option so please don't rule it out just yet.

My post crossed with Saffron's and agree that it's not jus the personality and caring nature to think about but also parenting and childcare methods and beliefs should be discussed upfront.


Unfortunately, not all the nannies seem to have childcare education or qualifications. I have met quite a few that just fallen into the job so it's worth keeping that in mind.

amydown Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My post crossed with Saffron's and agree that it's

> not jus the personality and caring nature to think

> about but also parenting and childcare methods and

> beliefs should be discussed upfront.

>

> Unfortunately, not all the nannies seem to have

> childcare education or qualifications. I have met

> quite a few that just fallen into the job so it's

> worth keeping that in mind.



Which is not of course to say that someone with no qualifications can't be great with kids, but I think we'd all agree that someone with a qualification definitely should be living up to it!

Two of the best nannies I have ever come across just fell into tne job, fwiw. For

me, experience comes above qualifications, but thats just my preference.


People often mistake me for a nanny, I find it amusing. Aint no one PAYING me to wrestle with these two rugrats! *grumble*

Ruth_Baldock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two of the best nannies I have ever come across

> just fell into tne job, fwiw. For

> me, experience comes above qualifications, but

> thats just my preference.

>

> People often mistake me for a nanny, I find it

> amusing. Aint no one PAYING me to wrestle with

> these two rugrats! *grumble*


I'm starting work in Sept... add my rugrat to your collection?

Yup! Agreed.




Saffron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> amydown Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My post crossed with Saffron's and agree that

> it's

> > not jus the personality and caring nature to

> think

> > about but also parenting and childcare methods

> and

> > beliefs should be discussed upfront.

> >

> > Unfortunately, not all the nannies seem to have

> > childcare education or qualifications. I have

> met

> > quite a few that just fallen into the job so

> it's

> > worth keeping that in mind.

>

>

> Which is not of course to say that someone with no

> qualifications can't be great with kids, but I

> think we'd all agree that someone with a

> qualification definitely should be living up to

> it!

On lookout wrote :

"I assure this was not posted to be a nanny bashing topic. It was simpley pointing out the actions of an individual."


An individual who happens to be a nanny. Behaving in a way you don't approve of. With a request for others' opinions on her behaviour and with a thread title specifically asking what "we" think about this. So it's not nanny-bashing, it's just singling out an individual you know nothing about and having a go anonymously on a public forum. That's ok then.


Finding the right nanny for you and your child can be a stressful process- by all means start a thread asking for advice on how to find the right nanny so that you can go to work feeling secure in the knowledge that you've left your child in the best care. Starting the discussion with a personal attack on someone who isn't being given the opportunity to defend herself is not cool.

Speaking of maturity your response was a little catty. My posting was not to attack, it was highlighting something I have witnessed on a few occasions. I will also point out that I said I am returning to work and will be needing a nanny for our son. I did not indicate that this nanny has put me off going back to work or choosing a nursery over a nanny.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...