Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Grayson Perry's new show starts tonight


"The Vanity of Small Differences" is at Victoria Miro (angel or old street tube) from 7 June - 11 August 2012.


http://www.channel4.com/assets/programmes/images/in-the-best-possible-taste-grayson-perry/the-vanity-of-small-differences/c397be21-9dcd-4900-8a66-d75faa53ed6d_412x232.jpg


He's showing six new tapestries:


"The tapestries tell the story of class mobility, for I think nothing has as strong an influence on our aesthetic taste as the social class in which we grow up"

(Grayson Perry)


Also see Channel 4's new three-part series:


"All in the Best Possible Taste" with Grayson Perry started on Tuesday 5 June at 10pm.


Personally, I like Grayson Perry and his work. I also like what he stands for. He's a man who, in a very British tradition, pushes our perception of how we see ourselves and this country. He crosses gender and class, and much like those who've gone before him, he makes us dig deep & explore our levels of tolerance.


Also i'm not sure where else in the world would embrace & encourage (or take to their heart), a man with an alar ego like Grayson's "Clare", let alone be a public figure.


An artist like Perry is to be cherished




Nette


(I shall report back later after the opening)


*now what frock shall I wear*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23837-grayson-perry/
Share on other sites

Thanks for this, I will go to his show, I saw the first episode of the television series and I thought it was brilliant.


Loved what he did and looking forward to the other two.


ETA: Parkdrive, your post is just pathetic.


Are you one of those people who think everybody should be just the same as you? Thank Christ they aren't.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You mean tolerated like ladyboys in Thailand, or

> just figures of fun? As for taking him to our

> hearts, I'm not sure very many people have/would.



Here's a pot


I'm sure Perry had you specially in mind when creating it PD


http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/7421/graysonphoto1.jpg


There was another pot, with a transexual man nearly naked on it, wearing a black suspenderbelt/stocking combo. He/she was sporting a dildo in her/his hand, using it like a tooth brush


One leg cocked slightly up, to give full view of the man tackle


Quite fetching it was too


Maybe not your thing; but good legs, probably a centre forward in a previous life


Nette

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> ETA: Parkdrive, your post is just pathetic.

>

> Are you one of those people who think everybody

> should be just the same as you? Thank Christ they

> aren't.


Not at all, merely stating my opinion, which is clearly at odds with yours, and you're right thank god we aren't all alike.

If good art is judged merely on the ability of a male artist to dress like a woman, then Danny La Rue must have been a bloody brilliant artist. If he's such a great artist, why the necessity for such a gimmick? Or does he need it to get people interested in what might otherwise be deemed by some to be crap?

And while we're at it, there's nothing wrong with a good curry washed down with a nice cool beer.

I think it's fair to say that cross-dressing helped secure him The Turner. But it's not as if he's a landscape painter who cross dresses to hit the headlines. Who / what he is - is reflected in - and a part of - what he makes.


Not many people work on their gimmick for three decades.. just in case they get famous.



His stuff doesn't do much for me, but 'ee's just a bloke in a dress ineeee' is poor.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If good art is judged merely on the ability of a

> male artist to dress like a woman, then Danny La

> Rue must have been a bloody brilliant artist. If

> he's such a great artist, why the necessity for

> such a gimmick? Or does he need it to get people

> interested in what might otherwise be deemed by

> some to be crap?


xxxxxxxx


Obviously art is not judged on that, what a ridiculous comment.


Grayson Perry is a great artist AND he happens to enjoy dressing as a woman/girl sometimes.


Presumably the various aspects of the personality of any artist will inform their art, whether it's cross dressing or anything else.


Louis Killen, who you won't have heard of, is a fantastic singer who only very recently has publicly come out - in his seventies - as having an alter ego, Louisa Killen. He has - extremely bravely in my opinion in view of comments of people like yourself - appeared on stage in women's clothes.


Are you suggesting that if he had done this at an earlier age it would somehow have given him an advantage in getting bookings/record contracts? I think not. His image was of a bearded, masculine, deep-voiced guy who sang songs about mining, the sea and stuff.



Cross-dressing is hardly going to turn crap art into great art. And there are always going to be some people who think some art is crap. I think much of what Damien Hirst has done is crap, but that doesn't seem to have held him back :))

It's hard not to keep turning out what many call 'crap' when so many rich gullible tossers insist on paying thousands for it. Takes great fortitude to resist the lure of lucre and produce real art again.


I think Hirst is aware of the dilemma and thought 'Sod it - I'll take their cash and do some more 'real' stuff later' - trouble is it's hard to go back - especially when you didn't leave a trail of crumbs to follow.


ETA: I do quite like Perry's work but would rather see Cornelia Parker's stuff any day.

MrsR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I loved this tv programme. Do you need to book

> tickets to see the tapestries or can you just turn

> up at the gallery? Also is there an admission

> charge?


No booking required and it's free entry.


http://www.victoria-miro.com/

dcradds Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am struggling to watch the middle class snobs

> spoiling Graysons programme All in the best

> possible taste.

> Revolting people.



I think any middle class snobs watching would think exactly the same.


He managed to analyse the clich?s of middle class taste without sneering and almost without offending which is quite a feat. His reassuring protestation of "but I'm middle class too!" helped, yet I couldn't help thinking that some of the guests at the tapestry viewing would go home a bit narked despite their nodding and smiling agreement at all his wit and insight.


That computerised tapestry machine was brill though.

Oh god, and yet another slew of polarised, class related excoriations ensues. It gives rise to desperation not aspiration frankly!


Aspiration is a facet of character, one might even argue of being human full stop. It has shit all to do with class.


I suppose at a pinch one might say it's cultural, but then there IS something about Britons' peculiar schadenfreudal love of failure and sneering at success that means you should all keep schtum on this one.


Back on topic I'm afraid Grayson doesn't really do it for me either, but then Chuckie Egg is my idea of a great artistic achievement.

  • 4 weeks later...

Went to the exhibition on Saturday.


Absolutely loved it. The tapestries are stunning, and lots of references to other works of art etc if you are into that sort of thing.


There is also a brilliant and really interesting installation upstairs by Sarah Sze (who also has smaller ones in a room which you have to walk through to get to the Grayson Perry). Nearly missed it but very glad I didn't.


Would have been worth going for that alone. Never heard of her before.


Good cup of tea overlooking a nice pond, too :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where to begin? I'm middle class and am quite happy for them to be used for information about voluntary/not for profit/non commercial events, they should not be used as a means of free advertising for businesses, small or otherwise, they are just not large enough.  Commjnity groups do not have the money to advertise to increase awareness of the services they offer. The examples you have given which you would like to see them used for may reflect your own priorities but the community of East Dulwich reflects a much wider range of interests and requirements. The  notice boards were introduced in 2011 when East Dulwich had already gentrified and their purpose discussed in the EDF thread announcing their arrival.  
    • The notice boards are a reasonable size, surely there should be room for both types of leaflets, after all we are meant to be a community? Unless space is extremely limited, it feels a little divisive for a councillor to say private businesses cannot post. All businesses are important for the lifeblood of a community too, aren't they?
    • Hilarious. Yes, they have magic wands and can make the last 14yrs of public asset stripping disappear overnight 🙄
    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...