Jump to content

Recommended Posts

how old is your baby? mine is 6 months and i am having similar trouble. i am just giving him water from a bottle as he just blows bubbles on everything else. he does it with the bottle too but also drinks a little bit.


I'm offering him different cups every so often as well as I'm hoping that he will catch on to water being for drinking!


we are alternating the doidy cup with a soft spouted sipper cup and have bought a firm spouted sipper cup to start trying too.


he does seem really interested in the doidy cup whereas the sippy cups he tries to bang them on the floor etc like toys.


i will be watching this thread with interest...

My eldest certainly did start to drink from a doidy cup long before she got the hang of a sippy cup. She did then manage quite young to drink from a normal cup (me holding it) if she needed to e.g. when out and about and needing a drink of water. But not sure if she'd have learned that just as well from a normal open cup or not.

kapaxiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you for your replies, she is 11months and

> although he does drink water/juice from any beaker

> she refuses to drink milk from them. I've bought

> different ones to try but once she realises its

> milk she throws the cup :-/


Hmmm quite high risk to try the doidy cup then!!

We used a doidy cup for water for a while which I think helped W get the hang of drinking from a normal cup. But I rarely bother with it now and usually use the tomee tippee ones for water because it's much less mess.


But he was never keen on milk and the only thing he will drink milk from is this Nuk bottle/cup hybrid: http://www.olivers-baby-care.co.uk/nuk-learner-bottle.html?utm_source=Google-Base&utm_medium=Web&utm_campaign=Gbase


It was recommended by a friend who tried everything for milk and it worked for her and us!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...