Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This junction at the best times is incredibly dangerous. Something has to be done about the sequence of the lights because its only been letting one or two cars through at a time, if your lucky. So consequently what your getting is impatient drivers jumping the lights which is incredibly dangerous and i'm relieved and amazed there hasn't been an accident, but unless something is done there may well be. I think installing a camera would be a good idea, particularly for the drivers who still turn right when there not supposed to. A filter light would be a wise idea as the buses obscure the view when turning right from East Dulwich.


Nicholas Driving Academy SE22

Yes i'm fully aware of this and I know there was a fatality. I commented on this thread but felt I needed to bring it up again.


Surely its not rocket science at least sort the lights out that would be a start and would help to ease the congestion and frustration it causes.


I really believe a filter light would improve it immenseley.

It would seem that even to the "non expert" eye that the phasing of the lights at this busy junction is just plain wrong.

Making them dysfunctional & counter productive to smooth traffic flow at best & plain dangerous at worst.

So what can be done to stimulate the responsible persons into doing something?


& by "something" I don't mean parking the camera Smart Car on the grass to catch a few illiterate numpties turning right against the sign! Illegal acts are just that, illegal & cannot be condoned nor accommodated, it's the whole overview of phasing & flow across the junction that needs a review.

I asked James about this in April, here is response


"Hi ontheRye,

Apparently junction redesign East Dulwich Road with Peckham Rye is in the hand of TfL who are pleading too busy until after the Olympics. Apparently after the olympics they'll review the workload they have and then give Southwark Council timescales. My hunch would be early 2013".


My understanding is that Tfl approval is required because the junction is used by buses. As no buses turn right south onto Peckham Rye at this junction, Tfl have no incentive to agree to such a filter. It does seem crazy given the overwhelming weight of opinion. Maybe we should start a petition to Tfl?

Renata


Are you saying that there are plans already drawn up & in hand, but that they won't actually start doing the work in the ground till after the Olympics?

Or

The survey & whole investigation process are going to be done, but even this won't start till after the Olympics?

I tend to avoid this junction at busy times (perhaps that?s what tfl want), and scoot around the back, although some of the shortcuts have been scuppered in recent years.

I you have to use this junction, the best approach is aggression, especially if you?re turning right (onto Peckham Rye). Position your car as far over to the right as possible, so as to intimidate oncoming traffic, and when some pussy slows down, hit it baby; then screech those wheels and make the move stick!

>:D<

  • 3 weeks later...

All the plans for the junction are with TFL, awaiting their comments/approval. I am aware that this junction does keep coming up on here, with regards to safety, light phasing and structure. It will have a major overhaul, but nothing will happen until after the summer due to the Olympics/Paralympic. Be aware also that the flow of traffic through this junction is huge and therefore it's never going to be easy to deal with!


Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
    • Do great pizzas there at community cafe.. lots going on — was free parking but plans  to like everywhere get folk to pay.  Nice area… only discovered it a few years ago..   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...