Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ahem! To be fair you don't go 22 games unbeaten by being disorganised. I thought France looked very good but were frustrated by England's two banks of four every time they attacked. Roy Hodgson has got us organised (that word again) defensively which is the first thing you have to do. Organisation starts at the back. If we can be more offensive and creative without shirking our defensive responsibilities it's possible we can do a lot better in this tournament. I feel we still have to be very cautious with our work without forgetting our attacking instincts if we are to progress any further. Just a little more positivity in midfield and sharpness in our finishing up front and I think we can go a little further in this competition.

I always wondered what it would be like to see somebody repeatedly tongue their own anus in front of a bemused crowd. Now I know.



With a better-than-50% chance of any drawn teams Having been to war with each other within the last century, the European championships are blessed with that extra subconscious (or not) frisson that the World Cup often lacks.



Adrian Chiles though.. Toby jug of warm piss. 'Nuff said.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's nothing to do with how you treat me (I

> honestly couldn't care less), it's just the rude

> way you talk to everyone.


I disagree and I know that El Pibe haved defended you in the past. You've just taken this opportunity to give a punch under the guise of the blame game. No doubt, *Bob* has done the same thing too.

Fair enough jah, I'm happy to retract the word. Sloppy perhaps, timid maybe, blunt, illiquid.

Far less the threat that they look on paper, England a little more.


And bob, harsh, I'm rather partial to the chiles charm, and as for that frisson I don't know what you're talking about, I mean what's more innocent than Poland-Russia....oh...erm, France-England....bugger, Germany-holland? Oops, ah well, Russia-Czech republic, damn......

Otta, you really should watch your tone. Gerrard should never have turned his back to a shot bearing in mind that he is playing in a major tournament. It has nothing to do with him being a Liverpool player.


eta: another Otta's comment designed to caused difficulties for myself.


@bon3yard


You're absolutey right.

You just don't understand, Otta. Puffing around the local school playing field playing field amateur football on the weekend gives you a unique insight into the professional game which no-one could hope to surpass.


Anyway.. Back to more pressing questions. Has Alan Hansen had a bit of work done since.. Well.. since the last World Cup?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...