Jump to content

Under warranty appliance not working despite repairs - John Lewis not refunding/replacing


Recommended Posts

Purchased a Miele dishwasher from John Lewis Aug 2018 with a 2 year warranty. It was kept in a box while we waited for kitchen renovation to start (builder had personal issues and we decided to wait for him). It was barely used for 6 months when it broke down. First service visit didn't happen - engineer called on the morning to say he didn't have the required spare part. With in the hour, their customer service rep called to say the engineer had called in sick. I believe one or the other was lying but knew will get nowhere by complaining about it. Second service visit - engineer "repaired", said it was "working" & left. I turned it on an hour later, it didn't run & quoted same error code. Third service visit - engineer didn't know what the issue was, what was previously done, what he was meant to do. He left with out doing anything because could not pull the dishwasher out to have a look due to small space on either side of the machine and tight hose at the back. My partner managed to pull it out that evening with out any great effort, he is not a DIY expert or experienced in such things, being a desk-job person! Both John Lewis and Miele refuse to refund or replace the machine despite several phone calls / emails / escalation, etc. A month after reporting the fault, I am now waiting for the fourth service visit. Four working days where I have to sit at home waiting for their day long time slots. Not to mention the time & energy spent on trying to resolve this issue, hassle & stress caused to me, skin deteriorating due to washing up by hand. Both companies quote the terms & conditions that they have the right to repair, the customer has to give access, etc. Am I naive not to expect to wash up manually for well over a month after paying 1K for a well reputed brand to a well reputed department store which was barely used for 6 months? Managers in both companies have told me there is no one higher than them to appeal this to and I just have to allow them to keep repairing until they believe the engineer costs have exceeded the cost of the machine in their eyes and even then it will be their discretion on what they do further! Any advice please on how to deal with this? Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I will buy you a frothy coffee from anywhere you like on Lordship Lane if that happens. Most of these costs never get recovered from the drivers that caused them. The photo shows a car that's been left on the zigzags protecting the crossing. Pedestrians crossing East to West and drivers heading South won't see each other until the pedestrians are in the road. That is a dangerous position to leave a car in. (I don't know if it's stil there, obviously).
    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...