Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's definitely a problem when there's a stalemate on the ground or you're not a big fan of the finer technical points of catch wrestling/bjj/grappling, I agree.


But there are a lot of incredible fights out there with some amazing striking and submission skills on display, not to mention super human levels of toughness.


Check out some highlight reels of the top guys - there's some pretty crazy grappling action . You also get stuff like this:




And that's in the last minute of a 25 minute war.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546605
Share on other sites

Prefer boxing, but like Otta I respect what they're doing in UFC and TBH find it hard to not watch if I come across a contest because I just have to know how it turns out.


Whether it's called a sport or not I don't care, I can't help but watch a scrap however it's conducted or whoever it involves.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546666
Share on other sites

jamie3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not intended but not unexpected - always

> interesting to gauge reaction too. Nette, is

> boxing also moronic?





Boxing is/was a decent sport , though it has been taken over somewhat by utter morons lately


See here


Tell me jamie3


Are you or have you been a fighter of any kind


or just a wanna-be-armchair-dreamer ?



What if they took the head kicks out of UFC, would it be so much fun?


I mean, it's the head kicking that thrills you, isn't it.



Nette

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546685
Share on other sites

Maxxi, you might be interested in K1 Rising which is coming up in a week or two. More an eagle dance fan myself but like a bit of salt action too.


Nette, I've competed in Boxing, Judo and BJJ and did Karate for quite a few years, none to any high level but enough to see things from an inside point of view and get to know a lot of other mma fans and practitioners.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546700
Share on other sites

Is UFC/MMA really more dangerous than boxing? Genuine question... what recorded cases are there of brain damage or death? In boxing, you're more likely to receive repeated blows to the head over a long bout, which could arguably be more harmful. Besides - if two guys want to get in the ring and fight, knowing the risks, it's totally up to them. Nobody's being forced to fight.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546747
Share on other sites

Jeremy - It's a complicated picture right now because the sport is still relatively young compared to boxing and the studies being conducted lack for a large and diverse enough group of subjects. But it's definitely harder on the body - Muay Thai and Wrestling take their toll on cruciate ligaments as well as bones and muscles absorbing impact. Catch/submission techniques cause a lot of hyper extension of joints as well as compressions - so breaks, fractures and tears are common. Thanks to the advances in brain scanning techniques there's now a huge controversy in the US over chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) which they've discovered is rife among players of American Football and is especially damaging for younger kids. They're just beginning with fighters - boxing and MMA. Rugby will shortly follow. Padded gloves allowing for a very specific kind of repetitive blunt force trauma over a longer period of time (12 rounds) and with counts that allow a fighter to 'recover' are currently not considered any safer than 4oz grappling gloves with no counts and fewer rounds etc etc. The general debate is ongoing but the science hasn't yet settled it. Either way, dangerous sports. I remember distinctly losing my appetite for boxing after watching the Eubank Watson fight - missed the Roy Jones era completely.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546758
Share on other sites

From Wpedia on Deaths in MMA



While competition in the MMA have been occasionally depicted as brutal by the media,[56] there were no documented cases of deaths after a sanctioned MMA event prior to 2007.[57]


In the period of 2007 to 2010, there were two fatalities in mixed martial arts matches. The first was the death of Sam Vasquez on November 30, 2007.[58] Vasquez collapsed shortly after being knocked out by Vince Libardi in the third round of an October 20, 2007 fight at the Toyota Center in Houston, Texas.[59] Vasquez had two separate surgeries to remove blood clots from his brain, and shortly after the second operation suffered a devastating stroke and never regained consciousness.[58] While questions have been asked about Vasquez's health before his final bout, no firm indications of pre-existing problems have yet surfaced. The second death stemming from a sanctioned mixed martial arts contest occurred in South Carolina on June 28, 2010, when 30-year old Michael Kirkham was knocked out and never regained consciousness. He was pronounced dead two days after the fight.[60]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23587-ufc-146/#findComment-546774
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...