Jump to content

Cracks in walls


alexablue22

Recommended Posts

Whatever you do , do not contact your insurance until you have very carefully had your problem assessed by a professional and competent building surveyor.


If you take it up with your insurer, they will "mark" your property forevermore as a subsidence property and you will be faced with massively increased premiums forever after. Plus, no other insurer will touch your property and you will seriously impair the value when you come to sell.


A surveyor will quickly tell you if it is serious or not and if it's something like a bay window issue it will be quite inexpensive for you to get fixed privately.

I've had minor subsidence issues in my previous two properties and on both occasions the insurer appointed a loss adjuster, who arranged monitoring, remediation and repair (i.e. trees removed, drains repaired, brickwork stitched, interior redecoration). Premium didn't increase (at least not by a significant amount). When it came to reselling, the buyer's solicitor wanted a description of works and copy of paperwork... when I sent surveyor's measurements proving that the problem had stabilised, the buyer seemed totally happy (in fact, I think his solicitor commented that this was a sign that the property had been well looked after). I did not experience any evidence of the property being black-marked.


Still, I don't necessarily disagree with tomdhu, getting an independent opinion to start with cannot be a bad thing, as long as they don't rip you off.


Here's another thought - the first thing the surveyor will do is set up monitoring, to check if the movement is continuing. You can actually do this yourself.. either with a few steel discs and set of calipers, or a device called a tell-tale.

Ivvan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would completely agree with the post by tomdhu

> on this.


As noted on another thread, my bay was neither cheap nor easy to fix.


It had to be completely rebuilt, new pillars and sill made by a stone mason, and three new windows installed. Then interior and exterior plastering and redecoration.


If I hadn't been insured I would have had to shell out a great deal of money.


Plus regardless of who has done the repairs, if there has been subsidence you are obliged to declare this on selling the house.


Up to you and your conscience, but lying to a buyer and their solicitor is not a road I would want to go down, for many reasons.


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,2056986

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...