Jump to content

Cracks in walls


alexablue22

Recommended Posts

Whatever you do , do not contact your insurance until you have very carefully had your problem assessed by a professional and competent building surveyor.


If you take it up with your insurer, they will "mark" your property forevermore as a subsidence property and you will be faced with massively increased premiums forever after. Plus, no other insurer will touch your property and you will seriously impair the value when you come to sell.


A surveyor will quickly tell you if it is serious or not and if it's something like a bay window issue it will be quite inexpensive for you to get fixed privately.

I've had minor subsidence issues in my previous two properties and on both occasions the insurer appointed a loss adjuster, who arranged monitoring, remediation and repair (i.e. trees removed, drains repaired, brickwork stitched, interior redecoration). Premium didn't increase (at least not by a significant amount). When it came to reselling, the buyer's solicitor wanted a description of works and copy of paperwork... when I sent surveyor's measurements proving that the problem had stabilised, the buyer seemed totally happy (in fact, I think his solicitor commented that this was a sign that the property had been well looked after). I did not experience any evidence of the property being black-marked.


Still, I don't necessarily disagree with tomdhu, getting an independent opinion to start with cannot be a bad thing, as long as they don't rip you off.


Here's another thought - the first thing the surveyor will do is set up monitoring, to check if the movement is continuing. You can actually do this yourself.. either with a few steel discs and set of calipers, or a device called a tell-tale.

Ivvan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would completely agree with the post by tomdhu

> on this.


As noted on another thread, my bay was neither cheap nor easy to fix.


It had to be completely rebuilt, new pillars and sill made by a stone mason, and three new windows installed. Then interior and exterior plastering and redecoration.


If I hadn't been insured I would have had to shell out a great deal of money.


Plus regardless of who has done the repairs, if there has been subsidence you are obliged to declare this on selling the house.


Up to you and your conscience, but lying to a buyer and their solicitor is not a road I would want to go down, for many reasons.


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,2056986

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • So Southwark in No Overall Control? Green / LD coalition?
    • Thanks for taking the trouble to do the calculation.  To be honest, it’s never occurred to me to report it online.  I’ll have to look into it.  I’ve just spoken to the ‘helpline’ and, after listening to ten minutes of some, admittedly, not too disagreeable jazz music, eventually got through to the call centre.  After a lot of to-ing and fro-ing, during which the operator was clearly reciting from a script, the essential question of why I continue to be billed by the RV method, despite their insistence on fitting a meter three years ago, went unresolved.  At first they couldn’t confirm whether I had a meter at all (not their department) but then agreed that I do have one but that it’s ’inactive’ (despite clearly recording usage as detailed above). I was told to contact the ‘meter department’ separately on a different number (Mon-Fri only) and was then asked if I wanted to sign up for various ‘pensioner’ benefits, none of which I understood (probably because I am a pensioner) before being asked to provide ‘feedback’, which I politely declined.  Looking forward to listening to some more jazz on Monday morning though.
    • That would be 78.231 m3, that is 78,231 liters.  The average water consumption per person in the UK is around 141 liters per day I believe.  So I'd say you're doing very well 👍 Have you tried to report your reading online?
    • Apart from potentially saving money (which TBF is more likely if there are fewer people living in your home) it is better for the environment to have a  water meter,  as you have an incentive to use less water. But roll on the re-nationalisation (is that a word?) of the water companies, before our green and pleasant land is covered with raw sewage. And so that the money from our water bills goes to improve the infrastructure rather than lining the pockets of already rich people. Vote Green! Ooops sorry, that's another thread.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...