Jump to content

Cracks in walls


alexablue22

Recommended Posts

Whatever you do , do not contact your insurance until you have very carefully had your problem assessed by a professional and competent building surveyor.


If you take it up with your insurer, they will "mark" your property forevermore as a subsidence property and you will be faced with massively increased premiums forever after. Plus, no other insurer will touch your property and you will seriously impair the value when you come to sell.


A surveyor will quickly tell you if it is serious or not and if it's something like a bay window issue it will be quite inexpensive for you to get fixed privately.

I've had minor subsidence issues in my previous two properties and on both occasions the insurer appointed a loss adjuster, who arranged monitoring, remediation and repair (i.e. trees removed, drains repaired, brickwork stitched, interior redecoration). Premium didn't increase (at least not by a significant amount). When it came to reselling, the buyer's solicitor wanted a description of works and copy of paperwork... when I sent surveyor's measurements proving that the problem had stabilised, the buyer seemed totally happy (in fact, I think his solicitor commented that this was a sign that the property had been well looked after). I did not experience any evidence of the property being black-marked.


Still, I don't necessarily disagree with tomdhu, getting an independent opinion to start with cannot be a bad thing, as long as they don't rip you off.


Here's another thought - the first thing the surveyor will do is set up monitoring, to check if the movement is continuing. You can actually do this yourself.. either with a few steel discs and set of calipers, or a device called a tell-tale.

Ivvan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would completely agree with the post by tomdhu

> on this.


As noted on another thread, my bay was neither cheap nor easy to fix.


It had to be completely rebuilt, new pillars and sill made by a stone mason, and three new windows installed. Then interior and exterior plastering and redecoration.


If I hadn't been insured I would have had to shell out a great deal of money.


Plus regardless of who has done the repairs, if there has been subsidence you are obliged to declare this on selling the house.


Up to you and your conscience, but lying to a buyer and their solicitor is not a road I would want to go down, for many reasons.


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,2056986

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...