Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just thought I'd start this thread to see if people more knowledgeable than me can explain about the new A&E set up at King's. I was there recently and it doesn't seem like an improvement in any way, but then I am just an average punter and don't understand NHS systems and thinking so it would be great to have an insight from someone in the know.


The "old" set up had large seating area with padded blue seats (at least I think they were padded) in rows in front of the large reception desk, and a separate A&E for children to the right just as you went in through the main entrance doors. This was the arrangement when King's was featured on 24 hours in A&E. It was also like that when I had to go in in 2017.


I'm not sure when it was rearranged but I had to go to A&E in the middle of the night recently. There were two stages to signing in at two separate desks and then the waiting area was tiny, more like a corridor with two rows of hard metal seats (like on a railway platform) facing each other. It couldn't have been a less comfortable place for someone in considerable pain to be left waiting for 3.5 hours. The jovial doctor who saw me in the end told me I should be grateful it wasn't a 7 hour wait like it had been a few nights previously.


Of course I understand the concept of waiting in A&E - there will always be someone more acutely ill and other emergencies coming in that take priority. But since we are expected to wait many hours - why does it have to be in a place as miserable and uncomfortable as you could imagine? The old waiting room was definitely a notch or two up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/235485-the-new-ae-at-kings/
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure the hard uncomfortable metal seating was in use under the previous layout of A and E. There was also a machine which dispensed fizzy drinks and unhealthy snacks and sweets. Presumably this was a big source of revenue. I am not sure if it still there. However I agree, the new layout is really dreadful. And the entrance on foot is less easy to find.

I'd guess it's designed to be just uncomfortable enough to discourage people who aren't really ill from wasting the medical staff's time trying to get in when there are people with genuine medical emergencies who need to be seen.


I was there in 2017 (definitely all hard metal seating in the main waiting area and not at all welcoming) and, after progressing through the two reception stages, was examined by a nurse who gave a wry chuckle and said it made a change to see someone who actually had something wrong with them.

I believe that when you are triaged in the first room you may be sent to a number of different second staging posts. If you were in one with a long waiting time that suggests that your problem was (probably) - (1) not life threatening and (2) would not lead to rapid deterioration (however bad it was it wasn't likely to get much worse). A simple break for instance, however painful, will be as treatable in 4 or 7 hours as it would be immediately. That makes it no better for you, of course, particularly if in pain, but at least you won't be with people who will be treated before you because of the severity of their problem.


This may be a better way to allocate ER resources, where clearly the acutely ill (those whose lives may be at risk, or whose condition is likely to deteriorate quickly) should be being treated first.


The downside is that you can enter the first room of the ER system thinking that it looks like there will be only a few ahead of you, only to enter a crowded 'second stage' room, which is dispiriting.

The first area you wait is counted for their "Admitted into A&E" stat, the second area you wait you're counted as admitted so it doesn't affect their stats.


But as the count-down to the magical 4 hour target wait is triggered from the 'admitted to A&E' time this actually does them no favours. Indeed forcing people to wait a longer time for first triage (which starts the clock) would be a better bet, if they wanted to fiddle their figures.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...