Jump to content

Recommended Posts

See now Bob Buzzard, that?s the kind of kit I saw on Amazon.....but then I confused myself. I was thinking do I really need to extend the signal, as opposed to make it stronger? The flat is real small and hardly any distance between WiFi box and Tv.


Please un-confuse me!

When you say ?placed?.....is it plugged into a phone socket? Or does it just hang out, un-attached, all independent like?!


When I was with Sky, I called them about the same issue and they went through the usual checks then said the only thing I could do is get a longer wire for the WiFi router and move it even closer to the tv.....which was not possible for me to do. I wonder why they didn?t just tell me to get a booster?

binklilyput - you are correct there are a number of different issues here you need to eliminate:


1. Base signal strength - you can test this by turning off your mobile data on your phone, ensuring your phone is connected to your flat wifi, stand next to your router and google "google speed test " . Click start test and it will give you your download and upload speed in mbps. You ideally want at least 5 mbps - 10mbps or more is enough for streaming to one device.


2. How this signal and your router performs in your flat. Run the speedtest again then start walking away from your router and watch how the speed changes depending on your location. You may need to run the test a few times but it gives you a base "heat map" of how your signal is performing in your specific flat. Is it weak in the room you need?


3. If the base signal strength is decent then you just need an extender but before you buy, check to see which are compatible with your router's signal type. Many of these are super easy to set up - they plug can plug directly into the mains and sync with your router using the WPS buttons on each device. If not , manual set up is required but it will have instructions telling you how to do it and is quite easy. If the router is newish then most should be but check. If the base signal itself is poor then you may need either a booster, or just swap the router for a better one.

Try experimenting with the position of the router, even at the same distance; or the orientation of its aerial. It's seemed to me that even radio waves find some paths easier than others.


Channel selection strategy might be worth thinking about; see eg: https://superuser.com/questions/1308736/should-wifi-routers-be-set-to-a-channel-or-choose-automatically/1308847.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Try experimenting with the position of the router,

> even at the same distance; or the orientation of

> its aerial. It's seemed to me that even radio

> waves find some paths easier than others.

>


That's what I did when I started working on my laptop in another room further from the router.


It took a while to find the right place for the router, but it's all fine now.

If the above advice fails then then simplest solution would be a wired connection to your (presumably smart TV or laptop ?) . You probably won't want to trail a cable from your router so you could look at using one of the ethernet-over-the-mains type arrangements. You need a pair and one is plugged into the mains next to your router and connected using a short ethernet cable, then you have another one in your living room and you have another ethernet cable that connects it to your TV/Laptop. However if the device you're using to watch netflix only supports a wifi connection and not a wired connection then this won't be an option for you !
  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...