Saturday 19th October 2019 - London - if you're not on march, sign the letter

[IlonaM]

https://www.peoples-vote.uk/let_us_be_heard

Park Lane to Parliament Square, London. 12pm, Saturday 19th October 2019 - London

'We will assemble on Park Lane, in London, on Saturday 19th October at 12 noon. We will then march through the heart of London to Parliament Square, where we will hear speeches from leading cross party politicians and celebrity voices who support a People?s Vote.'

'Why are we marching?

The march from Park Lane to Parliament will deliver a message loud and clear to the Government and MPs that they should trust the people, not Boris Johnson, to solve the Brexit crisis.

It follows a series of packed ?Let Us Be Heard? rallies in towns and cities across the UK this summer where people from all walks of life have demanded the right to a final say on Brexit.

This Brexit crisis has now come down to a simple question about whether we live in a democracy: can we allow Boris Johnson to force No Deal - or another vicious form of Brexit - on our country, without all of us having our voice heard?

The only way to break the deadlock in Parliament, legitimise the outcome and allow us all to talk about something else, is to give the people the final say.

Let Us Be Heard.'

'Saturday 19th October 2019 - London

PEOPLE'S VOTE MARCH - LET US BE HEARD

To avoid major disruption to Great Ormond Street Hospital's huge annual fundraiser we had to move our March to October 19.

This summer, the British people have the chance to force our way back into the final decision on Brexit. We are going on the offensive, with rallies in 15 towns and cities across the country, culminating with an enormous, historic march in London on October 19. Because it is now clear that this is a crisis that cannot be settled by a new prime minister or a deadlocked parliament. It can only be settled by us, the people.

Save the date. And let?s save the country.'

[uncleglen]

Shouldn't YOUR protest be called 'Some People's Vote March- B***s to Democracy' ?

[dbboy]

It happened on 23rd June 2016.

Are you saying that you don't support democracy and actually want a different outcome, otherwise called another referendum ,because the result of the first referendum can't be stomached? And just remind me how much Parliament has taken notice of you so far, none.

[Sephiroth]

Country were told they could have a great, easy deal

I?m willing to believe you couldn?t give a shit and just want no deal uncleglen. But don?t you dare suggest it?s what most of the country voted for because that is straight up bullshit and even you know that

[JohnL]

This paralysis of government won't be until Oct31 - It'll be for years and years whilst we talk/don't talk to the EU, accept/don't accept a WA/FTA, Negotiate with Trumps people and then possibly find Biden in charge etc etc.

[se22cat]

Easiest way out of this is to turn everyone who still want Brexit into Soylent Green as they really have no rightful place on the planet.

[keano77]

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Easiest way out of this is to turn everyone who

> still want Brexit into Soylent Green as they

> really have no rightful place on the planet.

Silly billy. If I remember soylent Green was based in a dystopian New York. If Remainers think they?ll grow two heads and have teeth like Bugs Bunny if they eat chlorinated chicken I cannot see the dictators of the EU allowing Soylent Green, no matter how cannibalistic your tendencies cat.

[Sephiroth]

Leavers man

No one is complaining about chlorinated chicken because it will mutate us

It?s because the chlorine is required in USA because welfare standards for animals and workers are so bad. What you are saying is you don?t give a shit about either

Although food poisoning rates are much higher over there too

[TheCat]

Fully support these people"s right to march for whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the slogan choice? :)

LET US BE HEARD????

This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3 years, I don't think being heard is the problem! Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as 'another' march demanding the same things seems unlikely to yield any different results from the previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

[diable rouge]

Let's suppose they did change the headline slogan, cue calls from the usual suspects* that they don't know what they want, no consistency in message etc etc etc...

*Thanks Cat, I've now got all 4 corners in this month's Brexit Bingo card...

[JohnL]

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fully support these people"s right to march for

> whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the

> slogan choice? :)

>

> LET US BE HEARD????

>

> This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> years, I don't think being heard is the problem!

> Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> 'another' march demanding the same things seems

> unlikely to yield any different results from the

> previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about gay people in the 1980s.

[TheCat]

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fully support these people"s right to march for

> > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the

> > slogan choice? :)

> >

> > LET US BE HEARD????

> >

> > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> > years, I don't think being heard is the

> problem!

> > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> > 'another' march demanding the same things seems

> > unlikely to yield any different results from

> the

> > previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

>

>

> You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about gay

> people in the 1980s.

And you remind me of someone unable to accept a crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong with suggesting a different approach to achieve the same goals?) without resorting to dog whistle association with something like homophobia. Grow up my friend.

[TheCat]

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's suppose they did change the headline slogan,

> cue calls from the usual suspects* that they don't

> know what they want, no consistency in message etc

> etc etc...

>

> *Thanks Cat, I've now got all 4 corners in this

> month's Brexit Bingo card...

I think you'll find it actually is a new slogan DR....

[diable rouge]

True dat Cat. Doesn't detract from the usual sniping comments from the usual suspects though...

[JohnL]

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Fully support these people"s right to march

> for

> > > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve

> the

> > > slogan choice? :)

> > >

> > > LET US BE HEARD????

> > >

> > > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> > > years, I don't think being heard is the

> > problem!

> > > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> > > 'another' march demanding the same things

> seems

> > > unlikely to yield any different results from

> > the

> > > previous 6 marches with the exact same

> message.

> >

> >

> > You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about

> gay

> > people in the 1980s.

>

> And you remind me of someone unable to accept a

> crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong

> with suggesting a different approach to achieve

> the same goals?) without resorting to dog whistle

> association with something like homophobia. Grow

> up my friend.

Sorry you won't shut me up - I'll actually make an attempt to be even remainier and louder the more I'm told to shut up.

[TheCat]

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > TheCat Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Fully support these people"s right to march

> > for

> > > > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve

> > the

> > > > slogan choice? :)

> > > >

> > > > LET US BE HEARD????

> > > >

> > > > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in

> 3

> > > > years, I don't think being heard is the

> > > problem!

> > > > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly?

> as

> > > > 'another' march demanding the same things

> > seems

> > > > unlikely to yield any different results

> from

> > > the

> > > > previous 6 marches with the exact same

> > message.

> > >

> > >

> > > You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about

> > gay

> > > people in the 1980s.

> >

> > And you remind me of someone unable to accept a

> > crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong

> > with suggesting a different approach to achieve

> > the same goals?) without resorting to dog

> whistle

> > association with something like homophobia.

> Grow

> > up my friend.

>

> Sorry you won't shut me up - I'll actually make an

> attempt to be even remainier and louder the more

> I'm told to shut up.

Good for you. If you actually read my comment as its written, instead of just assuming that in your wisdom you know what I 'really meant', then you'll find I have never said you should shut-up. I wish you the best of luck in your loudness.

[JohnL]

And unless people have been subject to it I think it's unfair ro call me out - I've been attacked many times and it's started again recently.

[JohnL]

"perhaps if people like you didn't behave like you do you'd be accepted more" takes me right back to the school playground

[TheCat]

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "perhaps if people like you didn't behave like you

> do you'd be accepted more" takes me right back to

> the school playground

Wow, you must have a PhD in 'Strawman theory'. 3 times now you've managed to make a tangential comment to highlight your 'perception' of the injustice of my comments. Rather than actually take as read the comments being made. I'm out. For the second time, best of luck.

[IlonaM]

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-march-october-travel-london-train-tube-underground-bus-peoples-vote-a9157176.html

[uncleglen]

Is that 'People's' as in Democratic People's republic of Korea (i.e North Korea- note the use of the word 'democratic...ha ha ha ...), or People's Republic of China?...

[Ridgley]

Was we not heard 2016?

[Captain Marvel]

We wasn't

[BrandNewGuy]

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was we not heard 2016?

Yes, but we were also heard in 1975, when Britain voted to remain. Why didn't you accept that vote?

[pk]

to be fair to 'you' you 'wasn't' asked a question with a proper answer in 2016 - leave doesn't mean leave as we can now clearly see

so unless you're saying in 2016 52% voted for the deal that Boris proposes today (they couldn't have) or that 52% really didn't care about any details (which seems clearly to be nonsense) then asking 'is this what you want?' is the only logical step

to stick to a 'brexit means brexit' mantra just makes people look stupid