Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my experience, there isn't much savings to be

> made anyway. The advantage is that you can refurb

> it to your taste/spec, but the discount such

> properties are offered at is not generous.


Tbh I'd rather not buy refurbished property savings or no because I invariably hate what the developer had done and would have to spend a fortune undoing it and doing it to my taste.

In an ideal world (OR rather MY ideal world) developers would just renew electrics and boilers and make good any disrepair fit a basic white ikea kitchen and then leave well alone.

my pet hates are; Recessed spotlights, Laminate flooring, Wall mounted t.v's,lowered ceilings,new window units that don't fully open, black sparkly granite,faux wenge wood, and beige : (

Actually being honest here I'm asking because I'm interested in selling a property that requires refurbishment - new kitchen ,new bathroom ,new flooring ,new windows ,replastered ceilings ,unfinished loft room ,repainting etc - but I couldn't see anything comparable on the market to give me an idea of price .

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually being honest here I'm asking because I'm

> interested in selling a property that requires

> refurbishment - new kitchen ,new bathroom ,new

> flooring ,new windows ,replastered ceilings

> ,unfinished loft room ,repainting etc - but I

> couldn't see anything comparable on the market to

> give me an idea of price .


Price above average for a fully refurbed property. As properties requiring work are very rare in this location, buyers will pay a premium for them.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would love that to be the case Blackcurrant but

> it seems a little... um .... counter intuitive ?


I'd say you're right, it's completely counter-intuitive since it means the buyer needs to factor in another ?100,000 just to get it to standard. It's not like moving into a property where everything is new(ish), functional etc but you just don't like the wallpaper.


Some friends spent about 12 years doing this more or less as a business. Started off buying a tiny 2-bed flat on the cheap - did it up nicely (doing almost all the work themselves), sold it for a decent profit, spent the money on a slightly bigger property, repeated this process. They ended up with a lovely 4-bedroom house that they now live in. It was a huge amount of hard work, juggling it with a full-time job initially but they were both very good DIYers, had access to a lot of the tools, paint etc and they made it work. Helped by an upturn in the market and the area, one of their properties got them over ?50,000 in clear profit.


The trick to selling is either to leave it as is and just say "needs extensive refurbishment" in which case the price won't be great unless it's an amazing location / unique house (there's a couple in the village that sold for big money even though they were in need of extensive modernisation just because they came onto the market so rarely) or to re-do it to a "plain" standard that is functional, safe and can be lived in while any further refurbishment is done "as and when" by the new buyer. Just need to price up the work that needs doing to bring it to that standard and the extra that you'll sell it for offset against when you want / need to move.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it seems a little... um .... counter intuitive ?


I'm not so sure.


If you have the money to be able to afford a house for ?1.2m+, chances are that you also have the money to indulge your desires - and afford something pretty snazzy on the extension front.


An already-extended home completed with a relatively modest budget (which is a lot of them) is unlikely to satisfy demand for said snazziness - nor offer the architectural blank slate to add it to taste. To some people it will feel like they're paying extra for something they don't think is up to scratch - and might even cost more to alter compared to it not being there in the first place and they did it themselves.


I've seen a few recently completed extensions done by people relatively new to the area. They're a league away from a Quicklofts on top and PlusSpace on the bottom.

Following a death - hubby inherited a property which was divided into 3 flats - one flat was leased out but the remaining 2 flats needed extensive work on them. We were quoted ?60.000 (15 years ago) just for external repairs. i.e. guttering, damp course, replacement windows, repointing etc. That was without updating electrics and remodelling rooms i.e. grotty kitchen and bathroom, and all decorations. Hubby not practical and project was to big for me also we did not gave the cash to fork out for builders. In the end the sitting tenant got a mortgage and purchased the 2 flats from us (in 2 stages) and took a couple of years to modernise the place.


We sold it cheaply to get rid of the property- but in hindsight if we could have raised the repair money and had professionals in to do the work- we could have got over ?1 million for it as a large detached property in its own grounds

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> that's just daft.


yes, it was tongue in cheek. But there is an element of truth in it. Buyers tend to underestimate what refurbishing costs and then bid up the price of run-down properties too much, wiping out any potential gains.


Extensions go out of fashion. In the 90s a mock victorian conservatory was a must have. Now it's all island units and bifold doors - "to bring the outside inside". Wait for that fad to pass and the few remaining unmolested victorian houses might well command a premium.

EPB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?...wiping out any prospective gains.?

>

> True, but many people are looking for a home, not

> an investment.


Yup! agree

I think too many people buy places to make money out of them rather than just thinking 'do I love this house? do I like this area? is this 'home' "

Houses are places to live in and build memories in not just money making machines.

Maybe I'm a sentimental old fool but I firmly belive if you buy somewhere you love in an area thats right for your needs you'll never regret it.

Property speculators and investors have killed Londons 'villages'

Blackcurrant Wrote:

---------------------------------------------

>

> Extensions go out of fashion. In the 90s a mock

> victorian conservatory was a must have. Now it's

> all island units and bifold doors - "to bring the

> outside inside". Wait for that fad to pass and the

> few remaining unmolested victorian houses might

> well command a premium.



I have an unmolested house.


I hope you're right 🤣

  • 4 weeks later...
1,963 sq ft is not that "huge" when compared to the houses around Underhill, Marmora Rd etc, particularly because there is probably a limited ability to extend in any direction. It's just the street and a chance to be in a proper Georgian / early Victorian house.

KateS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?1,750,000 "doer upper"

>

> https://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/prop

> erty-82806968.html

>

> I know it's a massively desirable road, and a huge

> house, but I still find it hilarious.


If you think that's hilarious then what about this one on East Dulwich Grove - outside the catchment area for DVI.


https://www.harveywheeler.com/listings/east-dulwich-grove-se22-29063621/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much!
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...