Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Techies and others wisdom required.


Our main TV is old and failing, our kids wreck and deprogramm all our DVDs and our DVD player so I'm thinking of getting a TV with internet. I have visions of a lovely uncluttered TV area with easy access to BBC Iplayer and a subscription to that new download programme/film site taht's been advertised alot and all will besorted.


Am I right?

Is the technology ok?

Is it through your wireless connection?

Will prices come down a bit?

Any views/experience etc


etc

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/
Share on other sites

haven't got one of those TV's, but I do have several consoldes which offer exactly the same functionality


the technology is solid. Streaming services do depend a bit on how good your ISP is but I rarely have any trouble and I odn't have a great ISP (Orange)

usually can be wifi or wired

prices of the TVs? Always


You can get same functionality on current TV from a ?100 xbox360 or PS3 if you prefer

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-543845
Share on other sites

I suggest you wait for OLED television for better picture quality and energy consumption in the next few years. They'll be even thinner than current sets today. LG is expected to launch a 55-inch version in a few months for a bargain price of ?5000! They're not to be confused with LEDs which are a totally different technoogy.


Also watch out for Youview, expected to be launched at the end of 2012. It will certain change the way you watch tv including smoother internet browsing, pvr functionality, HD freeview and more. All for a proposed ?200.


Samsung makes good televisions, no doubt. But they do have a dubious business practice where they would substitute their highly prized s-pva panels for inferior AO panels. Resulting in a phenomenon known as panel lottery amongst system builders.


Of couse, if I'm talking complete rubbish then please feel free to ask Alan Medic where he is able to recommend television technology on the basis of grammar and spelling!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-543969
Share on other sites

Thanks UDT, but I think your knowledge of technoogy is far superior to mine. Quids, you will need to factor in re-painting the room you will have it in so the walls and the TV don't clash. BTW if you wait a few months longer you will be able to get 'smell TV in 4D'. Could be the thing!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-543984
Share on other sites

I thought you might pick up on the 'technoogy' typo error where the L was missing. This is how small minded you are. But if you looked at my last paragraph then you would have noticed the right spelling of 'technology'.


Back to big minded matters. Here's a preview to 'youview'.


 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-544013
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a lot of potential Betamax-of-the-futures

> out there.

>

>

> Thank god my cathode ray tube is still pumping out

> the electrons - so I don't end-up with

> technological egg on my face.


Not sure where you got the idea on lots of potential Betamaxes-of-the-future. The last major format war was blu-ray v HD-DVD but hardly a concern for most people.


eta: t to no to make not and to avoid excessive pedanticness from the likes of AM.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-544121
Share on other sites

Quids, like all things technological, you're never bang up to date for long, by the time you wait for the 'next best thing' to arrive, there's talk of another 'next best thing'...same with costs, prices will come down for TV's that are considered to have 'old hat' technology, and any new technology like 3D will carry a premium initially, best to just jump in now, set a budget and minimum wish list...pop down to a local showroom or go up town to somewhere like John Lewis to get a general overview of what's out there, then having drawn up a shortlist see if you can get a better deal online...I've heard Samsung and Panasonic TV's are consistently good
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-544473
Share on other sites

I've had the same Sony LED 46 incher downstairs for 5 years, and it's only just playing up - which is quite unusual given that bloody Sony things usually only last 2 years.


Upstairs the 32 inch Sony HD LED is also still going strong after 12 years. That was when they were so excited about HDMI they put the logo on the front of the telly.


They're both HD and I really do struggle to tell the difference between them and new TVs in the picture quality assessment under usual viewing conditions.


I've got a mate with a huge Samsung with 3D and all the Smart TV jobbies and he doesn't use any of them. The applications are dull to anyone with the attention span of an adult, and it feels stupid sitting in your front room with 3D specs on - even for the footie.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-544485
Share on other sites

totally agree re 3D, i decided non on my recent new telly.


I say new, it was already a couple of years old when I got it in richer sounds last year, 4 grand down to 800 quid. It pays to follow red devil's advice and not get the latest thing immeditely.


It's a philips and I can honestly say I have yet to see a better picture even wandering past the latest and greatest, and it is a huge increase in quality from my old LG, though that was nominally HD it was 7 years old when it finally gave up the ghost.

It is quite bulky compared to the latest & greatest however

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-544488
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Upstairs the 32 inch Sony HD LED is also still

> going strong after 12 years. That was when they

> were so excited about HDMI they put the logo on

> the front of the telly.


Can't be 12 years old, HDMI devices didn't even appear on the shelves until 2004-ish.


In 2003 I bought a Toshiba 30 inch LCD TV (sans HDMI) for ?1000... seems unbelievable now. Within a year it was obsolete.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23426-internet-tvs/#findComment-544490
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...