Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bemusED - what's your problem? A sensible and articulate suggestion such as the one you made above has no place on an online forum......


For what it is worth I agree - a polite conversation with the neighbour should be the starting point.


I don't agree with the comments about the stapler though - it is annoying when someone pinches your stapler in the office. Stationary cupboard is for all but big ticket items such as staplers & hole punches, once claimed, should be protected at all costs.

OK everyone, thanks for your comments! Amazing how a simple question / complaint about bins in the road has digressed into a mildly lesbian thread about mechanics and whether or not children are a lifestyle choice. I love the edf for this!


Anyway - yes it's every day, no it's not bin day, no they aren't having anything delivered, no they're not in any way disabled - unless being a bit pathetic and selfish can be classed as a disability?


I suppose I could have a word with them but I can't really be arsed.


I do have a car (and children) of my own, and yes, parking is a problem, but so what? I knew that when I moved here. It doesn't exactly ruin my life not to park in front of my house.


Actually I noticed yesterday there was a different car in front of their house so unless they've bought a new one (or an extra one) maybe they've seen this thread and given up!

whatever Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I do have a car (and children) of my own, and yes,

> parking is a problem, but so what? I knew that

> when I moved here. It doesn't exactly ruin my life

> not to park in front of my house.

>

I think that is the best attitude to have Whatever. I like it.

I had to put bins outside my Mother in laws House once to reserve a parking space. I also put out at note expaining that a skip delivery was expected and the bins would be removed once it was delivered. There was no comeback from neighbours.


When I have to use my local garage, I drop the car off about 9/10 pm the night before as hardly any cars in the street near the garage. I go down in the morning around 9 am to drop off the keys, and the street is bumper to bumper with cars. This shows that local businesses and commutors are the prime 'suspects'.

In the parlance of criminal justice, a 'suspect' is a known person suspected of committing a crime.

These people are not committing a crime as they are not parking in spaces reserved for specific users, such as Blue Badge holders, residents or motorcycles.

Renting or owning a house does not automatically grant you ownership of the parking space directly outside your front door. In fact, deliberately restricting access to a parking space that is not reserved for your use does not adhere to the Highway code and therefore you are committing a crime / offence.

I?m beginning to understand why people crack, shave their heads, climb the nearest electric pylon brandishing a glock and shoot everything in sight.

There are too many self righteous muppets completely missing the point on this thread.

LeahP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the parlance of criminal justice, a 'suspect'

> is a known person suspected of committing a

> crime.

> These people are not committing a crime as they

> are not parking in spaces reserved for specific

> users, such as Blue Badge holders, residents or

> motorcycles.

> Renting or owning a house does not automatically

> grant you ownership of the parking space directly

> outside your front door. In fact, deliberately

> restricting access to a parking space that is not

> reserved for your use does not adhere to the

> Highway code and therefore you are committing a

> crime / offence.

> I?m beginning to understand why people crack,

> shave their heads, climb the nearest electric

> pylon brandishing a glock and shoot everything in

> sight.

> There are too many self righteous muppets

> completely missing the point on this thread.



First you said these people are not committing a crime. Then you said they are committing a crime/offence by restricting access to a parking space that is not reserved for your use.

Toddlers and babies can't walk.


You get the horrible dilema - do I take the kids to the house and then leave them in the house on their own while fetching shopping or vice versa or double park to drop the shopping and then park and take kids. All are fraught with danger. Suspect this is part of the populatirty of internet grocery shopping.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toddlers and babies can't walk.

>

> You get the horrible dilema - do I take the kids

> to the house and then leave them in the house on

> their own while fetching shopping or vice versa or

> double park to drop the shopping and then park and

> take kids. All are fraught with danger. Suspect

> this is part of the populatirty of internet

> grocery shopping.


Yeah, well, stuff happens like that. What about getting a trolley and wheeling it from car. Or just take in perishables first and leave the other stuff till later.

My understanding is that anyone who obstructs the public highway (with green bins for example) is committing an offfence under section 137 of the Highways Act 1980 or section 28 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847.


However, the application of these laws is also subject to 'reasonable use' - for example loading and unloading etc. that is established by magistrates.


So the use of green bins to 'own a parking space' would have to be tested in this context. I suspect that there would have to be a sustained and recorded series of offences, along with a demonstrable impact upon the neighborhood for a case like this to even reach a magistrate, and even then you'd be hard pushed to prove it was unreasonable given the history and regularity of public parking infractions.


The best way to establish an 'unreasonable' obstruction of the public highway may be if this action were proved unreasonable because it lead to a public order offence.... ;-)


Regarding the various garages, carwashes and estate agents that make use of on-street parking, I think this would need to be tested under a separate offence - the use of the public highway for commercial storage.


I think there'd be a much better chance of success in a case like this, but even so the decision regarding parking would also be weighed up against the needs of the community for local services and commerce.


In addition, most councils view licensed and taxed vehicles (even if parked up for commercial purposes) as 'reasonable' users of the highway, meaning that if you did decide to test the law you'd need a pretty strong case to win it. Feeling pissed off wouldn't be enough.


So I think you'd probably lose that one too.


Best way is to use social pressure to change the antisocial behaviour of these twonks.

This thread is unbelievable....


If you have a problem with the behaviour of your neighbours, why don't you just at least try talking to them about it first, before moaning on online forums or getting the council or police involved? While its true that some people may not react well to being asked to change their behaviour, but you could at least try - they might be perfectly reasonable about it if you explained why it is a problem for you.


The original complainant's statement of "I suppose I could have a word with them but I can't really be arsed." sums it all up - its easier to moan to others behind their back that get off your backside and see if you can resolve the problem. Why is it that British people can't confront somebody face to face and prefer to moan online...??

Doesn't even need to be "confrontation" Klikker. I love my neighbours. Sure they like the odd party and they have their cars and their kids but they're really good people. I daresay that sometimes I'm an annoying neighbour for whatever reason. We don't sweat the small stuff and we never have. It's a very chilled out corner of our street. In the last year I've had skips outside my house constantly, and major deliveries to the house (bricks, steels etc.). Nobody parked outside my house in all that time - they wanted my builders to have the best and most convenient access to my property. Without being asked - everyone was really considerate. I didn't need to put bins out. Now the skips are gone and the cars are back. Not an issue (and never has been).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...