Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*group hug*


Too much one upmanship and wikiedpeia C&P points scoring bludz & theres a bad vibe on teh streets of the hood innit - some soldier is gonna get shanked for disrespekting our hard won right to vote innit


lets save our hate for those who deserve it


The Royal Family


Nick Clegg


Thatcher


Richard Branson & the former members of Genesis


Apple

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23408-too-much-hate-in-the-lounge/
Share on other sites

Woodrot - you only provide a binary choice Love or Hate. Most of us are too nuanced for that, so why not propose a scaled approach?


1 = Consuming Hatred


10 = Uncritical Love


With ZERO (0) to represent the "frankly I don't give a damn" position.


For your list my scores are:


The Royal Family The Queen - 8, the rest 5


Nick Clegg 0


Thatcher 8


Richard Branson 6


Former members of Genesis 0


Apple 7


And to add a few more:


Ken Livingstone 2


Arthur Scargill 2


New Nexus 2


Stalin 2


Hitler 1


Katie Price 0

A Hate Index?, good work MM!!!


I'm having a think and I'm clearly mellowing in my old age, the royals on masse barely register a 6, Queenie earning herself a 7 for unselfish if rather dull service over the years despite my instinctive republican leanings, though Charlie probably gets a 4.


Tories in a general principal sort of way potter between 5 and 6 though I'm sure I can muster one or two to go lower, ditto labour.


Galloway, he could probably get a 3 in good company with premiership football.


Katie Price is a 0 though what she represents is pretty much 2.


Paying booking fees on gig tickets (at a per ticket basis gggnnrrrrrrrkrkkhkrhrr!!!) is the only thing I can think of that gets a 1.


Oh, and Tony Blair obviously.

Bob Crow and the RMT: 1 (assuming the meter stops there. Else -99)


Camilla: 8 (the lady is just class in her dignified silence)


Ken: 7 (glad he lost the election, but do have a soft spot for him)


Ed Miliband: Meh. High on the Don't-Care-O-Meter. I mean, I'm not sure he actually exists.


The Guardian: 3 or 7, depending on what day it is and what stupid/smart opinion they have posted today.


Judge Judy: 9


Microsoft: 7 (when I am using Word)


Microsoft: 2 (when I am using Excel 2007)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...