Jump to content

Recommended Posts

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KK,

>

> Think consultation has been extended by a day- so

> last day tomorrow. It turns out that many

> residents in Chesterfield have not received a

> letter from the council and so were oblivious to

> the most recent application. Overall this does not

> look reflect well on the Council.


That, I was under the impression, applied to postal submissions.


All of Chesterfield Grove "should" have been notified or at least those that submitted comments the last time round. Although saying that, last time the only reason the whole street was notified was due to a resident physically posting the notice through the doors themselves so I wouldn't be at all surprised if it hasn't been done yet.


It is certainly disappointing the planning department aren't more active or at least our councilors pushing for a bit more action to be done.

Consistency all round is questionable.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Any news on Waitrose? ☺


The Co-op is planning on selling off a large chunk of its supermarket estate within the m25 as part of a money saving and restructuring exercise. All this Iceland/M&S debacle may well be a flash in the pan compared to when and if 56-62 Lordship Lane gets sold on and taken over by Waitrose or similar.


Louisa

  • 1 month later...
Louisa Surely they are waiting for a sub-sub committee to meet to arrange a meeting for the sub committee to meet and arrange a date for when they themselves can meet to arrange a date to be submitted and confirmed to make a final decision

Richy86 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I really dont understand why anyone would want an

> iceland instead of an M&S or a Waitrose? Both of

> which would be a fantastic addition to LL.

>

> Iceland massively drags the place down.

>

> Bring it on I say.



When you get a little Older you might understand.

spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Richy86 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I really dont understand why anyone would want

> an

> > iceland instead of an M&S or a Waitrose? Both

> of

> > which would be a fantastic addition to LL.

> >

> > Iceland massively drags the place down.

> >

> > Bring it on I say.

>

>

> When you get a little Older you might understand.


You might also want to find out what the plans are all about before making such comments too Richy86

Spider69,


Please dont insult me with with your derogatory comments.


You can honestly say you would prefer the eye sore that is Iceland over a Waitrose or M&S? As a resident of ED surely you see the benefit of the Waitrose effect? It is widely known that the presence of such a store can be quite prosperous for the area. Plus Iceland stores are ghastly.


Fight it all you want but I think you might find there are quite a few changes that take place over the next few years as the area grows in popularity.


The increase in popularity is going to bring about regeneration and with that comes the interest from larger businesses.

Richy,


Many might find an M&S more of an imposition- do read the planning application and then you will understand local concerns about over development.


In what ways do you think the area would benefit from 'regeneration' and the interest of larger businesses moving in? Do you have a particular vision for the high street?

James couldnt agree with you more.


People love a moan. Like you say, the older people get, the harder it is to embrace change.


ED's population is getting younger and more affluent. The local economy will naturally adapt to cater for that.


As Spider says, maybe when im older I will understand...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well yes.  But only up to a point eu countries have had to spend a LOT of money to accommodate English madness  - and has had to deal with years of incoherent positioning.  It has destabilised the EU as a group - or has at the very least distracted it and consumed bandwidth  which is why Putin was so pro-Brexit. Which enabled other subsequent events - it’s hard to imagine the world as it is now without Brexit.  A stronger EU.  Uk not a mess and in its own after multiple elections and way more prime ministers than 9 years could possibly allow   a stronger united front 
    • I have mail delivered for a Ms L Missen, would like to give it to them.
    • I might be able to help - text me and I will send you some details 07972 368 261
    • Yeah but I suppose the issue is that Brexit/Truss moment destabilised our economy and Trump's Truss moment is destabilising every economy globally and rocking the very foundation of global trading. Our stupid moments were just our stupid moments - Trump's stupid moment is everyone's stupid moment. The fact that people have been getting out of gold as well as stocks speaks volumes - gold is normally the safe-haven investors head for but lots are just cashing out completely.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...