Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wish that people who want to have a go at the political positions of particular Councillors would start their own "knocking" thread rather than using this M&S thread. I am interested in seeing people's views on the M&S issue and don't want to keep reading knockabout political point scoring on this subject.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ever wondered why M&S food costs so much? It is to

> help pay for their advertising budget and bonuses.

> It has nothing to do with quality.



Anyone who has ever tasted Iceland and M & S food knows this to be untrue. Plus I reckon Stacey Soloman doesn't come cheap.

Hi eddie,

Nicely taken out of context.


Bricklayers arms - occupied lots of land next to a secondary school which has no playing field there. So they bus down to their playing fields in ED. most of our local primary schools have no playing fields. Removing the daft flyover could result in said adjacent school having playing field there and our primary schools having local playing fields. The land in all cases is publicly owned by the council/schools and would involve swapping. The flyover costs considerable amounts for TfL to maintain - ?1M this year alone.


Burgess Park. A neighbouring business that juts into the park burnt down. Buying our the scrap yard would turn a grotty entrance into something better. The price to do this would be significantly lower at this time. My interest is obtaining best value and also my great aunts home and business was flattened as part of the Abercrombie plan to create this park. I also see no reason why residents in the centre of Southwark can't one day have a park they're as proud of as we are of Peckham and Dulwich parks.


Hopefully we can all get back to Lordship Lane.


regards james


eddie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Local resident to local politician: ?Can the area

> behind the police station be used for parking?

>

> Local politician; ?Southwark council does not have

> the sort of spare cash required to buy the land?

>

> Seems to be a perfectly reasonable response by a

> local politician in looking after what all our

> local taxes are spent on. However this is the same

> local politician that has proposed the following

> council expenditure;

>

> 1. Buy a business, knock down the building it is

> located in and extend Burgess Park.

> 2. Knock down the flyover on the Old Kent Road as

> it? only serves commuters from Kent?

>

> So nice to see local politicians looking after our

> local interests! Ya have to smile.

>

> Did I see that the Lib Dems were beaten in the

> local election by a penguin?

jimmyay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fantastic idea having an M&S in Lordship Lane. It

> will help anchor the high street and bolster other

> businesses. As well as giving us locals more

> choice. I'm over the moon about these proposals!


What utter nonsense! 'Anchor the High Street' - eh??


'more choice'...of what? - over-priced packet food?

Go to Bromley - they have a massive M&S in very big 'anchored' high street.

Are you referring to me jimmyay? I'm neither a moaner, nor an inverted snob. I have no problem with people having money - what I do have a problem with is people applauding the arrival of a 'High Street' shop replacing another high street shop which sells, basically, convenience food. That's what we already have. We also have lots of other great retailers which offer good bread, meat and veg. If it's high street you want, go to Bromley! Personally, I prefer the feel of a neighbourhood full of the 'butcher, baker, candle-stick maker' type shops. Individuality.


I have been here all my life, and I totally understand the need for retailers to reflect the changing demographic but M&S doth not a community make. Once Starbucks/Nerro moved in it all went downhill. (Star bucks=universal cash. And SHITE coffee)

basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Anyone who has ever tasted Iceland and M & S food

> knows this to be untrue. Plus I reckon Stacey

> Soloman doesn't come cheap.


Sadly, you're mistaken, basher. Your taste buds are influenced by advertising. M&S spend ?160m on their advertising. Plus ?80m on staff bonuses. Once you factor in the fancy packaging you then realise that M&S buy their food cheap and sell them at high prices to the muppets. It seems Economics isn't your best subject, basher. Just as bad as your taste buds.

Well...........Im disabled moved Dulwich 4 years ago always use iceland for my top up esentials no car to go peckham or brixton.

Id be happy with a Aldi or Lidl i miss not having them near me since had move.

Ms no good people like myself.

neighbours in my area all use iceland for kiddies milk etc.

loss of car park not good idea.

building isnt eyesore.....

whats an eyesore is emtpy property on dulwich grove with metal eviction boarding.........in a sense that could be asomones home....


co op isnt so bad....do at least do specials quite often......

tallulah71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> what I do have a

> problem with is people applauding the arrival of a

> 'High Street' shop replacing another high street

> shop which sells, basically, convenience food.

> That's what we already have.


Agreed. We'll be replacing one shop which I never, ever use. With one which I will probably use occasionally. And a scruffy building will be getting a bit of a facelift into the bargain. So from my personal perspective, it's good news.


One chain replacing another does not mean the end of LL as we know it. In fact, I suspect that the main losers will be Sainsburys Local and Co-op.

I'm all for it - it replaces a shop I've never set foot in, with one I would. I'd prefer a Waitrose, but an M&S would be fine too. I'm just after somewhere that does some good quality convenience food, which has a decent range. I think it would compliment the Lane nicely.
Sadly, Gidget and Maxxi, you cant stand in the way of progress! I am now firmly established as a Village (and East Dulwich is a Village in my mind) business and can only feel positive about the removal of a downmarket corporate, such is Iceland, to be replaced by an upmarket establishment like M nd S. If we were losing one of the more local independents then I may look at it differently. Having studied the businesses in LL I can see only a few places that would improve from a more upmarket corporate. Costcutter, Iceland, Co-Op, to be replaced by M&S Food, Laithwaites Wine and Waterstones. Subtle changes that would make a huge difference to the foot fall in the Village. My business? You all know it!!

Local residents,


If anyone has concerns please get them in here...before it is too late. There is only a tiny window to voice objections




email: [email protected]


with your name,address and application no: 12/AP/1340



Do particularly consider how the development may impact on your everyday living if you live close to the proposed development, parking, noise, deliveries, etc Positive comments can also be submitted! It would be good if local businesses as well as residents respond to the consultation too.

Exactly! People are conveniently forgetting that Iceland is a chain store... The local independents don't compete with M&S's convenience offerings so all those proclaiming the end of the our quaint highstreet are talking nonesense. The only thing about the high street that's changing is it is more gentrified. And like someone else said, people who don't like it are inverted snobs-- simple. It's unfortunate for those who feel displaced by this but it only reflects the changing reality of the area. Saying the more affluent residents in ED should go to Bromely's M&S rather than the decreasing percentage of less well off residents popping over to Peckham's Iceland is rediculous.





Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tallulah71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > what I do have a

> > problem with is people applauding the arrival of

> a

> > 'High Street' shop replacing another high

> street

> > shop which sells, basically, convenience food.

> > That's what we already have.

>

> Agreed. We'll be replacing one shop which I never,

> ever use. With one which I will probably use

> occasionally. And a scruffy building will be

> getting a bit of a facelift into the bargain. So

> from my personal perspective, it's good news.

>

> One chain replacing another does not mean the end

> of LL as we know it. In fact, I suspect that the

> main losers will be Sainsburys Local and Co-op.

AlexC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm all for it - it replaces a shop I've never set

> foot in, with one I would. I'd prefer a Waitrose,

> but an M&S would be fine too. I'm just after

> somewhere that does some good quality convenience

> food, which has a decent range. I think it would

> compliment the Lane nicely.


Perhaps you would be more qualified to make comments like this if had set foot in Iceland.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AlexC Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm all for it - it replaces a shop I've never

> set

> > foot in, with one I would. I'd prefer a

> Waitrose,

> > but an M&S would be fine too. I'm just after

> > somewhere that does some good quality

> convenience

> > food, which has a decent range. I think it

> would

> > compliment the Lane nicely.

>

> Perhaps you would be more qualified to make

> comments like this if had set foot in Iceland.


Sorry Alan, didn't realise I wasn't allowed to have an opinion. I've not set foot in this Iceland branch, I have set foot in another branch in the past. Many years ago. It's not the sort of place I would personally choose to shop in - I'd rather have an M&S or a Waitrose. That's my personal opinion, but sorry. I forgot I wasn't allowed to have one. Numpty...

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No you have to set foot in anything before you

> have an opinion. I Personally Hate Dog mess,

> MacDonalds and Las Vagas but am unable to comment

> on Nazis.


Good call. I will from now on refrain from commenting on North Korea, until I finally manage to holiday in Pyongyang.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And like someone else said,

> people who don't like it are inverted snobs--

> simple.

>


I don't like M&S food because they do not meet my high standards. The term 'nverted snob' does not apply to me.


I also feel embarrassed to wear their clothes due to lack of the 'cool factor'.


Quite simple really, those who shop inside M&S do not understand quality or style.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...