Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People have fought, been imprisoned and died for the right to belong to a TRADE UNION - a right still denied to many in oppressive regimes so everyone SHOULD join a trade union... No?... oh alright then. I suppose it's a choice thing.


In UK everyone may join a union - the fact that less and less choose to do so is, perhaps, a reflection of Trade Union's behaviour in the recent past, the generally good employment legislation encated over the last century (many as a result of TU lobbying). Today Trade Unions are largely irrelevant, only dominant in the public sector and often appear to be something closer to a politically motivated protection racket - "fighting" for their members to be given preferential, taxpayer funded, status in defiance of economic reality.

Funny how some people on the one hand promote the idea of trade unions being irrelevant, yet on the other hand bemoan their continued influence on working practices and ability to "hold us to ransom."


It's a human right to belong to a trade union. The decline in membership has nothing to do with their "behaviour in the recent past" (what does this even mean?) It's because of things like the decline in UK manufacturing, globalisation, the shift to more transient employment, migration and most recently the state of the economy.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People have fought, been imprisoned and died for

> the right to belong to a TRADE UNION - a right

> still denied to many in oppressive regimes so

> everyone SHOULD join a trade union... No?... oh

> alright then. I suppose it's a choice thing.

>

> In UK everyone may join a union - the fact that

> less and less choose to do so is, perhaps, a

> reflection of Trade Union's behaviour in the

> recent past, the generally good employment

> legislation encated over the last century (many as

> a result of TU lobbying). Today Trade Unions are

> largely irrelevant, only dominant in the public

> sector and often appear to be something closer to

> a politically motivated protection racket -

> "fighting" for their members to be given

> preferential, taxpayer funded, status in defiance

> of economic reality.



Kind of muddying my point there MM - I was using the example to point out that DD's argument (that people fought and died to get the vote so people SHOULD always vote) wasn't as clear cut as it sounded.


People shouldn't vote out of gratitude for the sacrifice of the past especially as not voting can make more of a point in an age where democracy - such as it is - has become so debased and decadent.


For many people - whether the zealots on the forum like it or not - voting is (as you put it) 'largely irrelevant' to their lives just as trades unions are.


The arguments for voting as an imperative are ideological and based on theory (like what happens if we all jump up and down at the same time) and we all know the reality is (in this country) a two-party state with fringes that will plough the same furrows it has ploughed for decades regardless until and unless something cataclysmic changes that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My main issue is leaves lying on the road, being washed into drain covers then causing flooding risk. 
    • Really don’t  know why people don’t sell their property by them selves…or at least start that way… not difficult if a freehold house, might be  more complicated if leasehold flat but with a good solicitor doing his work, should be fine. With many people using internet, plenty of people put  looking and numerous  other ways to reach target audience. Was a relocation agent for  years both in sales and letting through London and home  counties.. ie acquiring properties for individuals. Same goes for rental/ letting agents.. tenancy agreements are standard, totally agree that various laws governing terms  are updated but nowadays the majority of estate agents in letting and I assume sales  belong to a recognised body so really one can let oneself. Tenancies are free on line or can be purchased for a nominal sum. What do they do for their commission in both instances? Introduce tenant or buyer, in theory check out references and produce a tenancy agreement, agree amendments, sign by both parties, collect deposit and rent. Organise inventory check in and that is it. And then if you decide to pay them for management of property an additional fee in the hope that they will use approve contractors for all repairs in a suitable time frame for tenant. Was a post earlier or towards last year not sure on here or Facebook covering this point and lack of management from agent for months. I hasten to add that not all sales or rental agents behave in this manner but certainly some in good old ED. was definitely a posting about a well known agent in the village who was “slow” concerning the above. From memory, change if staff and just got buried…in my book totally unacceptable excuse. That is why they have managers in each estate agent to overseas and stay abreast of sales and lettings. Can’t pass the buck…and most companies irrespective of type of industry have a leaving policy and hand over policy produced normally by HR..Same could be said for consultants in  new build sales but normally they are  responsible and accountable from start to finish ie monitoring sale  the whole way, have to produce weekly reports to head office  plus  follow up on all enquiries. Been their as well over my career. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...