Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People have fought, been imprisoned and died for the right to belong to a TRADE UNION - a right still denied to many in oppressive regimes so everyone SHOULD join a trade union... No?... oh alright then. I suppose it's a choice thing.


In UK everyone may join a union - the fact that less and less choose to do so is, perhaps, a reflection of Trade Union's behaviour in the recent past, the generally good employment legislation encated over the last century (many as a result of TU lobbying). Today Trade Unions are largely irrelevant, only dominant in the public sector and often appear to be something closer to a politically motivated protection racket - "fighting" for their members to be given preferential, taxpayer funded, status in defiance of economic reality.

Funny how some people on the one hand promote the idea of trade unions being irrelevant, yet on the other hand bemoan their continued influence on working practices and ability to "hold us to ransom."


It's a human right to belong to a trade union. The decline in membership has nothing to do with their "behaviour in the recent past" (what does this even mean?) It's because of things like the decline in UK manufacturing, globalisation, the shift to more transient employment, migration and most recently the state of the economy.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People have fought, been imprisoned and died for

> the right to belong to a TRADE UNION - a right

> still denied to many in oppressive regimes so

> everyone SHOULD join a trade union... No?... oh

> alright then. I suppose it's a choice thing.

>

> In UK everyone may join a union - the fact that

> less and less choose to do so is, perhaps, a

> reflection of Trade Union's behaviour in the

> recent past, the generally good employment

> legislation encated over the last century (many as

> a result of TU lobbying). Today Trade Unions are

> largely irrelevant, only dominant in the public

> sector and often appear to be something closer to

> a politically motivated protection racket -

> "fighting" for their members to be given

> preferential, taxpayer funded, status in defiance

> of economic reality.



Kind of muddying my point there MM - I was using the example to point out that DD's argument (that people fought and died to get the vote so people SHOULD always vote) wasn't as clear cut as it sounded.


People shouldn't vote out of gratitude for the sacrifice of the past especially as not voting can make more of a point in an age where democracy - such as it is - has become so debased and decadent.


For many people - whether the zealots on the forum like it or not - voting is (as you put it) 'largely irrelevant' to their lives just as trades unions are.


The arguments for voting as an imperative are ideological and based on theory (like what happens if we all jump up and down at the same time) and we all know the reality is (in this country) a two-party state with fringes that will plough the same furrows it has ploughed for decades regardless until and unless something cataclysmic changes that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I read elsewhere that somebody was stabbed,  but I have no idea how reliable that information is.
    • Hello Did anyone see an accident about 15 minutes ago at the junction of Goodrich and Friern Road. A black car driven by a lady ran in to the side of my car as I was coming up Friern Road- instead of pulling over she drove off without providing her insurance information. If anyone happened to see this or has her license plate details please pm me. Thanks 
    • Hi everyone,  I have a few slots for next few days, if anyone need  a tidy or one off, please feel free to call, text, or WhatsApp as well. Thanks very much Fernando Pinto 
    • On what basis do you object to the economy spend numbers in the report and describe it as "extremely unlikely"? Is that objection based on data or is it vibes-based? Where does this estimate of "50-100 vehicles" come from? The objectors:supporters ratio doesn't speak volumes. Planning applications of this sort always receive objections from various curtain twitches and NIMBYs. It doesn't mean those objections are well-founded or sensible. The planning officers and councillors need to consider the issue objectively, not just count the letters. It's not a public vote. Saying the building is "out of character" is meaningless out of context. It's an unusual building on an unusual infill site. It's not supposed to be a model for future development across Dulwich as a whole.  We are in the middle of a housing crisis. London desperately needs more housing units. This is an opportunity to get a whole bunch of them on a small, unloved industrial site on top of a transit hub. Not building it because people like the Dulwich Society complains it's "visible" is crazy.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...