Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So forget about the institutionalised sleaze, the pointless league tables, the hypocrital self-righteousness, the unmitigated failure to achieve anything, the subjugation of our foreign policy to a bunch of fascists in washington, the warmongering, the riding roughshod over national opinion, the erosion of personal liberties...he had a nice smile.


I'd say, rather sadly, that Brown has indeed lived up to expectations (I'm not a fan, can you tell); but for all that, and his discomfort in front of the cameras, he's comported himself with more dignity and the spin machine, if not gone, is much quieter.

Plus he has more personal integrity in his sweaty jowls than Blair could muster in a lifetime.


God if this is the level of national debate no wonder we're stuck between the wannabe blair and his his vacuous party and a gutless labour party always out for themselves first and foremost.

Sheesh.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67303
Share on other sites

Andrew Marr summed it nicely up at the end of his recent programme on contemporary British politics, and I quote from memory

"For all Blairs impact on the political stage, his achievements were transient. Though he served as long as Thatcher and whatever our personal feelings to them are, we are all Thatchers children but we will never be Blair's children.


I couldn't have put it better myself. Blair has only one legacy and that's Iraq. Seriously, tell me what Eden did....waiting....Suez perchance?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67327
Share on other sites

I actually got excited when he binned the supercasinos but he's been pretty timid since.


Mockney's post sums up mad-dog Blair's time at the top and I'm thankful the stary eyed nutter is somewhere else but feel sorry for the Palistinians.


Sweaty jowls and lack of colgate smile should not mean anything, but unless he loosens the American's grip on our country and starts running things for us, he'll continue to be judged on meaningless sh!t like that.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67332
Share on other sites

Lets be honest Supercasinos are not going to make an impact on British society. They are just a distraction to deter from the real issues. I refer you to Mockneys earlier post:


?the pointless league tables? the unmitigated failure to achieve anything, the subjugation of our foreign policy to a bunch of fascists in washington, the warmongering, the riding roughshod over national opinion, the erosion of personal liberties?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67340
Share on other sites

Blair's government chucked a fair amount of money at education and health, two key issues for many of us, but if you're a child-free healthy adult male, you will be unlikely to have noticed the improvements in schools and hospitals.


I am fairly confident that if the Tories had stayed in power, they would have continued to starve schools and the NHS of cash, and my kids' births, operations, and education would not have been nearly so positive. So I wouldn't say they failed to achieved anything.


I think the warmongering Yankee lapdog brought about tangible improvements in health and education.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67347
Share on other sites

As for his early successes regards Flooding and Foot & Mouth, there was a very interesting article in Private Eye about how DEFRA had intended to strengthen much needed flood defences along many of our rivers, following investigations into previous floods.

Plus a certain research establishment had reported on its desperately crumbling sewers and vulnerability to a flood. This work was also scheduled for fixing.

Then Brown at the treasury slashed Defra's budgets spelling an end to both projects, indirectly exacerbating the floods that then wrecked the lab that was making Foot and Mouth vaccines that spread to the countryside...causing the crisis.

So all he was doing was damage limitations on things he caused in the first place. Ho hum.


Brown so far has only made surface show of distancing himself from the Neocons, but on key issues, ie ruling out attack on Iran, extending our Nuclear deterrent when we're signed up to getting rid of it and supposed to be encouraging others to do likewise? Nada.

*sigh* and ID cards...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67351
Share on other sites

Blinder, I'm not sure I can agree about the improvements in schools and hospitals, it's more that they have created a way to show how good or bad a school is without actually giving much thought at all to the education of the child.


Same for hospitals, and same for most local authority services.


With regards Brown, I feel safer with him at the healm than with Blair, and I think he is a good man. However, I truly fear that the tory spin machine might do a 97 Blair, and send him packing... I will be voting Labour for the first time if it really loks like that could happen...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67368
Share on other sites

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please, never the Tories again. Better the devil

> you know. Although it's possible I'll be voting

> Green next time round or Monster Raving Loony

> Party.


Go monster raving looney. I am a card carrying member myself.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67390
Share on other sites

I don't want to enjoy a prime minister, I want them to do a good job. Blair was totally obsessed with what people thought of him, what his legacy would be, how he could change things..change change change. Politicians can't accept 'if it ain't broke...' because people like to see somebody doing something, changing things. Plenty of stuff needs fixing in this country, but most of it is nitty gritty, dull and difficult without immediate returns.

So take the easy way out, chuck money at problems via a bunch of overpriced management consultants, think that the competition and choice ethics will somehow magically improve things and then walk away when it all turns to sh!t, go 'sort out' the middle east...tw@t.


But yeah, he is rather dishy :D

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67400
Share on other sites

  Quote


True dat, Brendan


  Quote

Amen - much as I dislike so much about this last 10 years, that would be worse. Even if I was a Tory I would hate Labour AND be upset at the alternative offered currently by "my side".

And yes CWALD - I'm aware of the alternatives but even if I agreed with them 100% I know I'd be wasting my vote in the current system. And anyway - what Brendan said


  Quote


PGC - that is exactly what I thought when I saw the title as well

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2321-gordon-brown/#findComment-67443
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been thinking about it and what I have loosely come up with so far are sites and types. Sites Here, Comment is Free, the Independent, the BBC (difficult as their comments section is only ever on trivia), The Telegraph (less so but increasing), The times (rapidly increasing), New Statesman, Spectator (much less so but some increase) even the Daily Mail and UnHerd (perhaps even union platforms, agit-prop and "progressive" platforms, XR, "middle-East", Just Stop Oil, Reddit, Bluesky, Truth Social etc.) I am sure the AI will find more to cross-reference. Types Astro-turfers, single-issue obsessives (frequently overlap with Astro-turfers), floral enforcers, ideologues, political staff, hypocrites, luxury belief pushers, Igors and Renfields. The vast majority are; normal local residents a bit frustrated with something; those looking for a tradesman; or just the friendly saying hello and looking for a bit of community. Spartacus thank you. Although you should probably find something else to more interesting occupy your time; my energy for this is rapidly deflating. It won't disappear and I will get it done (once I work out which AI and which parameters to use) but it might not happen for a while. I saw your comment on the PIP thread; you have to use your single worst day to apply. Being bravely determined not to be defeated (a quality most normal people find admirable and honourable) means your claim can easily be rejected or at least made difficult. "I will get up, I will walk to the shop, I will cook". Those are the tests you have to make clear you only ever fail at. Sorry but its the truth. I wish you good luck with it.
    • Going by tracking information they go via Croydon and East Dulwich (Peckham) sorting offices. Round my way, and I know it varies from street to street, delivery of tracked items brought by the regular postman is mostly reliable. I've noticed if there isn't a postman doing a regular round, there may be a walking postman just delivering the tracked items. 
    • Are the parcel services organised by the local sorting office? We always notice parcels delivered by the vans are delivered on time but those that come via the postie can be unpredictable and we often get a "you were not in" when no-one even attempted delivery.
    • Yes, this thread has got weird.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...