It's a few years since I last grappled with a Windows installation, but I don't recall ever having done any apparent harm by using a Windows installation or recovery drive for repair purposes, and it can be effective. Reinstalling the boot manager software shouldn't be a big or precarious deal for it. It's already identified the problem and knows how to repair itself.
But has it been established that poor sewerage infrastructure can be a cause of flooding; and then such as to attribute a legal responsibility for it to a water company?
They're not. But the work to build bunds which hold significant amounts of water in Dulwich and more recently Peckham Rye parks, was undertaken to mitigate the impacts of poor drainage and sewerage infrastructure (which was under invested in for years) causing flooding to properties. The latter is (as I understand it) the responsibility of the water companies.
I believe taxpayers have paid for the underinvestment in infrastructure by the water companies in two ways; firstly, by paying to have the changes made to the parks (I never got a clear answer from Renata on this forum when I asked, but think this is the case); and secondly through the loss of amenity those schemes inevitably create when those parks are waterlogged through the winter months.
As I said, privatised profits, socialised costs.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.