Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We borrowed a pool (not Gubodge's, although dammit, why didn't you offer?!) and I had a very long latent labour. The midwives gave me the OK to get in the pool and I spent two days on and off in it, 'watching' TV. That and the TENS got me through. Sadly I had to get out to give birth as the baby was at an awkward angle. Next time (fingers crossed) I'd like to stay in to the end. I absolutely loved the pool and was starkers throughout with no awareness at all of being naked.
Forgot to say that although I laboured in the pool, baby was actually born on dry land. There was a but of a gush of blood during one of my pushing contractions which meant I had to get out of the pool so that the midwife could assess. All was fine and baby was born 10 minutes later. Would love to have a water birth next time if I'm lucky enough to have a next time!

pebbles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had home water births with both of mine. I

> bought the pool because had been warned that when

> using the community midwives there was always the

> chance that it might not be available and I didn't

> want that to happen.


Yes, that's what happened to me! My labour progressed so quickly that no pools were available. (Poor bloke whose wife had the pool called to say that we could have it, as his wife's labour had stalled, but my daughter had been born already 20 min before he rang our midwife!)


Although, I don't know if I could have gotten in a pool anyway b/c I didn't want to give up the TENS machine. My husband kept trying to get me in a warm bath, but he couldn't convince me to take off the TENS. I think it would have helped though. I had a warm bath at the start of labour, and it was very soothing. I think we'd hire a pool if I had to do it again. Maybe a pool would have been more appealing than a bath, b/c a pool is a lot roomier. If I were definitely having a birthing pool, I'd want to have a doula too - extra help with pool etc.

I had a hospital birth (which unfortunatly ended in a C-section) but I loved the birthing pool for the first however many hours until it became clear things weren't going to plan. I'd definately say get one, and then see how you feel. 2 of my friends who had home births had them but never used them, one was too quick the other just didn't feel like it so I guess you just can't tell until it happens - would be annoying to really want one and not have it though. ooh I wish I could have just stayed in the pool for the whole thing.



Actually my daughter is heading for 3 now and only fairly recently stopped being terrified of all swimming, baths etc. perhaps that explains her reluctance to come out in the pool ;o)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sure. He is ideological driven on many things. He was the person that defended the blanket CPZ policy because he believed that 'if you asked most people in southwark if all parking should be paid for, most would say yes'. A completely unfounded belief not backed by any evidence. In the real world, that policy caused significant local electoral damage for some councillors. I personally see his disillusion with the Labour Party as one of his idealism vs the reality of governance. He will probably be much happier with the Greens.
    • Arguably, as regards local needs for free(er) flowing traffic and some acknowledgement of expressed wishes he hasn't been. The 'active travel' and particularly the cycling lobby seems to have got far more of his attention than others. In that aspect, at least he would seem to be far more likely to be happy amongst the avowedly private-car hating Greens. A perfectly reasonable stance, of course, but one which certainly doesn't qualify as 'arguing for local needs'. He hasn't, equally, been very obviously supportive of those, his direct constituents I believe, who have been less than enthusiastic about Gala.
    • The problem with the first Southwark leadership election is that two proxy votes were cast, which is against Southwark's own party rules. So that is why the election was re-run. The controversy is in switching to an online as opposed to in person second election. James has causes he vehemently stands for, and it's fair enough if he thinks the local Labour Party is no longer for him. Government is not easy, and there are hard decisions to be made always. London councils have always had a better deal when it comes to central funding, and anyone who travels to the North frequently can see the stark difference. It's that failure to see the bigger picture that I find most surprising about his comments. Sure, as a local councillor he should be always arguing for local needs, but reform of central government funding to give more help to poorer regions has been a long held aim by this Labour Party, and especially since Brexit, where poorer regions benefitting from EU grants lost out.  As always, it will be the public that decides at the ballot box. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...