Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Government advice, not widely highlighted by midwives or health visitors in my experience, is for all children under 5 to take daily multivitamins. I've tried offering Abidec and the 'great tasting' Wellkid Baby and Infant, but both are very firmly rejected by my 20-month old. Any tips?

Is the advice not simply because of the nationwide problem of people not cooking healthy meals and lacking basic nutritional knowledge? If your little one is eating well I'm a firm believer that a vitamin supplement isn't necessary. If they get what they need from food you are literally flushing money down the toilet :)


I had HVs tell me (with both #1 and #2) that I should give my babies supplements "because you are breastfeeding and it doesn't have the same vitamins as formula". Grrr.

That's outrageous! And sooo annoying. When health providers give wrong/bad advice, it always makes me feel that it then undermines their good advice b/c I'm inclined to be a skeptic about everything. I had a nurse tell me that I should stop b/fing when my daughter's teeth erupted, b/c she (wrongly) thought breastmilk causes dental caries.


I think supplements are a bit of a waste if your diet is good, but at the same time, if it puts your mind at ease, then I can understand why people use them, eg vitamin D deficiency is a big concern for many people at high latitudes. Plus, some children seem to be more fussy about food anyway. I give my daughter Bassetts occasionally, but I don't worry about it if she doesn't have one for a while either.


I think the BLW weaning book has info on dietary sources of vitamins/minerals in the back pages. I also found Alex Richardson's book "They Are What You Feed Them" to be really easy to read and not patronising of parents. It has advice and information on a wide-variety of food and supplement-related issues with diet.

I always diluted abidec with water as a juice for my daughter and she always accepted with breakfast. She has had vitamins since birth. She is now taking bassetts soft and chewy from about 30months old, 6 months before recommended. I always gave her vitamins as I breastfed for 2 years throughout ongoing health issues with myself. She never dropped feeds ever between this time. Until she self weaned at 2 she was still feeding as if she was a newborn although a lot of it would of been for comfort more than milk. Whilst I was breast feeding I was found to be extremely vitamin d deficient (my consultant had never seen such low levels of vitamin d in a woman of my age - I had almost none in my system) I had to start immediate high dosage of vitamin d to boost my supply. This made me very weary of her lacking in vitamin d too, since then I have always made sure she took a multivitamin supplement.
Pickle, your HV was just repeating government advice. Although it may seem dispiriting it's true that we can be absolutely sure how much vit D is in formula and we can't with breast milk. That doesn't mean anyone is saying breast milk isn't as good and I certainly don't want to get into that debate! But advice has to be formulated on a population basis so if many women don't have enough vit D then their breast milk won't contain alot, so supplements are reasonable advice.
Thanks for all these helpful posts. I breastfed my daughter till 15 months and absolutely believe it was the best thing for her, but took supplements myself during that time. I heard a news item about a baby of 4 months dying from Rickets in the UK, presumably because the mother's level of vitamin D during pregnancy was very low, which has reminded me about the issue. In January this year the Chief Medical Officer sent out advice that all pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, and children aged 6 months to 5 years take vitamin D, as evidence suggested 1 in 4 people are deficient. See http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9035173/Vitamin-D-deficiency-in-UK-a-major-problem.html, or for the letter itself, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_132508.pdf. There are signs of a resurgence of Rickets in the UK, at the extreme end, and other bone development problems in milder cases. From what I understand, it was eradicated at one time by giving all children Cod Liver oil, and by supplementing common foods, but now we longer give Cod Liver oil, and are rigorous about covering children up and using sunscreen in sunny weather, the problem is resurfacing. The organic foods I've been buying (good for other reasons) don't seem to be supplemented as old-fashioned sugar and salt laden baby foods once were, perhaps!

edanna Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pickle, your HV was just repeating government

> advice. Although it may seem dispiriting it's true

> that we can be absolutely sure how much vit D is

> in formula and we can't with breast milk. That

> doesn't mean anyone is saying breast milk isn't as

> good and I certainly don't want to get into that

> debate! But advice has to be formulated on a

> population basis so if many women don't have

> enough vit D then their breast milk won't contain

> alot, so supplements are reasonable advice.


OK, but, surely the advice should be to supplement the mother, as Vit D complexes in breastmilk would be more readily absorbed than extraneously delivered Vit D to the infant???


Also, I still think Pickle's HV was wrong to compare b/fing to formula. If supplementation is needed, it is not b/c there is a comparison to be draw to formula. Actually, breastmilk from a healthy mother is the standard to which all other infant feeding formulas should be compared. If supplements or dietary changes are thought beneficial, it should be as a way to maximise the benefit derived from a healthy, normal breastfeeding dyad, not as a comparison to formulated milks.

OSW your point about Vit D and the recent use of sunscreens, covering up etc is very salient in my mind. We're very fair-skinned and are always very sun cautious.


An adult friend of mine was recently told that b/c she needs to use so much sun protection during the summer for fair skin, there is little chance that she has ability to store enough Vit D to last through the winter. Her Vit D is so chronically low that her GP and her dietitian have recommended supplements, as they felt it would be difficult to assure her vit D was high enough through diet.


Sunbob, interested in the Vit drops you got from HV! I will ask our HV too at our 2yr check this week.


I try not to obsess about nutrition, but I guess there are a few times when our bodies can use some help. xx

My daughter has been taking Sainsburys chewable multivitamins and omega3. She loves them! We started them when she was around 2.5 years although they say from 3. She is a very fussy eater so I feel they can only do her good. It's very difficult to get her to take medicine so the abcd ones were out even hidden she could tell- they do stink! I also have a 6 month old and I keep diverting to give his healthy start drops. I'm still breastfeeding him though and I take supplements myself.

we use the wellbaby vitamins which our 2 year old loves. She is veggie and also quite fussy so these are a precaution for her. You can't get the drops (which I used to put into her milk) from the HV at 2 years old so you have to buy. I wasn't sure about the chewy sweets (too many dentists in the family!) so went for liquid which we give at breakfast so her teeth will be cleaned soon after.


TBH I think this is good advice, we can offer the most balanced diet in the world but can't force our children to eat it, so at least this ensures they are getting important nutrients.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I spoke at the council meeting last night to object. 400 people objected to the development. I, and I suspect everyone else, is not against development, BUT the size of this too BIG to accept. The council is held hostage by the developer who is promising 53 affordable homes. And in return they get to build 360 bedrooms for students. The original plan was all student accommodation. 8 stories is completely out of sync. It’s sets a precedent for future development. They have been taking to the council since 2022.  What did not help our cause whatsoever was Counsellors McAsh and Mwangangye speaking as ward counsellors at the meeting. As the Chair of the committee said, it’s not often ward counsellors attend such meetings. The counsellors will say they didn’t speak for or against the development. However, they did speak up for the benefits of the site bringing more affordable housing to the borough. They asked for a window to have frosted glass to protect privacy. They asked for residents to be consulted during the building phase. So let’s be really clear, they did not say anything about the “optimisation” of the site. They did not ask for the site to be scaled down. Now I know why James would not be drawn into discussing the development before now….   Make no mistake, this development is optimised for profit and the trade off is the developer profits at scale and the council have 53 affordable homes. The Southwark Plan says they should respect the character of East Dulwich. How can an 8 story building be ever respectful to the character of East Dulwich. It’s a hugely imposing building.  Unless we stand up together as a community, then we shall be stuck with it, although I suspect we won’t be stuck with our Labour counsellors for much longer… Feeling let down and disappointed this morning.   
    • Another glowing review for Niko the plumber. I found his details on the forum after we had a water leak. He was able to come round same day and fixed our problem. He was very reasonable and did a great job.    His number is 07818 607583.   Matt 
    • Putin's little helpers (like theTelegraph) TRUMPeting (sorry not sorry) the fact that UK only gets 10% tariff from uSA as a Brexit Dividend and validating Starmer's qauiescence  Which ignores so much The tariff was calculated on a childish  deficit/exports calculation and ignored any discussion 25% on cars remains in place for UK as well The difference between 10% UK vs 20% EU is a fraction of the cost of Brexit anyway (that cost was dismissed as "worth it" or hand waved away - whereas this relatively small "Win" is heralded as a major victory plus in any case even if UK was on 0%, teh global fallout from this will massively impact UK as a standalone country anyway   Of course not many countries escaped with 0% - oh but Russia did
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...