Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17769929


Planned births at home and in midwifery units are more cost-effective than giving birth in hospital, particularly for women who have given birth before, University of Oxford research suggests.


For women having their first baby, however, planned home birth was more risky for the baby but still the most cost-effective option.





BMJ here: http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2292

One criticism of the study though - it didn't look at the cost of pre-natal care, it seems that you get a lot more care from a smaller team of midwives if you opt for a home birth, this presumably would add to the costs. My NCT teacher advised my whole class to claim we wanted home births even if we didn't just so we'd get better antenatal care (we could pretend to chicken out at the last minute if we really wanted to go to hospital!)
dulwichgirl2, the recently published and very comprehensive 'Birthplace study' results find that for a low risk woman having a second or subsequent baby a planned homebirth is a safer option than having her baby in an obstetric unit, and as safe as the safest option - a midwife led unit. Sadly the safest option for birth - midwife led unit- is not one that's to be made available to the women of ED, unless they travel to central London or to Lewisham. And it's not looking likely that it will be available any time soon in the future either. :(
I thought it was interesting that the BBC article chose to emphasize the homebirth aspect (hence the title), but that the research itself emphasized also the importance of midwife-led birthing units. It seemed to me that the BBC article was fishing for an eye-catching or contraversial headline, a bit at the expense of emphasizing the importance of midwife-led units (or the lack thereof).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm getting dozens of fliers a year from all the estate agents.  I'm not selling, thinking of selling or renting out. The one from John D Woods really got my goat as it is plastic coated so can't even be recycled.  I've emailed them.  They must be making so much money to to these mass mail outs.  I couldn't find the old thread about things that put you into an irrational rage (although this rage is not irrational) I have a nice time too watching GB win their first medal at the Winter Olympics - that is an understatement! I'll burn it, sod the tiny impact on air quality.
    • @PenguinYou will have to explain this to me bearing in mind your and others outrage at a possible new scheme on Ryedale, and the use by many on this forum of Southwark News to support their reaction. I don't know what precautionary mindset means.  The precautionary principle is that we need to act now for example in tackling climate change rather than wait twenty years for conclusive evidence (that was the situation in 2006 when Stern published his report) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
    • Yes, and their sister (?) company Inigo has some interesting Not Modern properties as well! Interesting as in marvelling at people's very varied  tastes 🤣
    • Is it possible for someone to change the heading, because it is not clear that this "fatality" has not just happened. I'm not sure that the OP still posts on here. Admin?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...