Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know I?m a grumpy old man, but when did it become standard / acceptable to put your feet up on the seats when sitting on the train. I don?t remember this being a thing (except perhaps amongst surly teenagers) in the past. Now grown men and women get on the train and the trotters go up without a thought or care. Should have put this in the small things irrational rage thread perhaps 🤔
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/230161-trotters-up/
Share on other sites

I was on a train near Glasgow a couple of weeks ago - the feet on seats was still happening, but I watched the guard tell multiple people to take them off. He was politely firm and they all did what he said. As a Londoner it was a joy to watch, but sadly I'm not sure it would work so well down here.
An old lady was denied a seat by a young man today but she found one next to me and then said that the generations have changed and remarked that young people not going up to the top deck was just baffling to her. She had a stick and a heavy overcoat and warm hat and I felt for her and agreed with her in a short conversation. She had dignity, though and she wasn't angry, just resigned and a bit perplexed. (No. 12)

OutOfFocus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it coincides with the "Let the passengers

> of the train first(repeal) act"and the "Don't keep

> you personal stereo personal regulations"



Was that before or after queuing became illegal and punishable by public humiliation ?


During the war things were so much better, bring back hanging for minor crimes I say, that will learn 'em 🤐

This is why I don?t use public transport. The ignorance of some passengers is shocking. Elderly people and mothers/fathers with prams having to navigate a phone fixated teen or 20 something with their feet sprawled across a couple of seats in front of them, oblivious to the needs of others around them.


I am happy to use my car for longer distances or simply walk if it?s round the corner.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...