Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why in God's name should a professional have to do it!?!? As far as I know, Southwark don't employ Dog Mess Cleaners, and if I were a street cleaner, I'd feel that clearing up everyone's pet's mess was a touch above and beyond the call of duty!


Owners of the dogs should clean up, plain and simple! If they don't, they're gits, and I guess the poor street cleaners will be left to do it, but anyone who doesn't pick up after their animal, thinking that it's someone else's responsibility is an irresponsible, inconsiderate arsehole! :X


Here endeth my Monday morning rant.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229-dog-excrement/#findComment-3916
Share on other sites

I live by Goose Green and I see people exercising their dogs and most of them do pick up their "dog's eggs", however there are a few who don?t. What can I do? I've better things to do and I'm not sad enough (yet) to sit there with a telephoto lens and capture the perpetrators on camera and report them to the dog pooh police. Am I legally allowed to rub their noses in it? Can I fling it back at them whilst shouting "excuse me, you forgot this"?

Scenario: You're walking through Goose Green in the summer and there's people playing frisbee and children doing roly-polys(? ). You see a couple with their dog, the dog poohs and the three of them happily walk off without picking it up, what would you do?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229-dog-excrement/#findComment-3918
Share on other sites

Mark, in my case it depends on how big they both are (and the dog too)! I have once been brave enough to order a bloke with one of those scary pit bull type dogs out of a children's play area though. Having owned a dog, and having been able to endure the yuckiness of picking up handfuls of warm dog poo, I reckon anyone can do it!


Clean up after your dogs y'all!


spymum


(Blog: Posh Mum)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229-dog-excrement/#findComment-3919
Share on other sites

Melbourne Grove is dog sh*t alley. I hate the way that every single tree has its little pile of turds adorning its base. I find myself having to gingerly watch my every step walking home in the darkness to avoid the smeared mess on the pavements. Think the whole thing is a weird chav's revenge class war kind of action..
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229-dog-excrement/#findComment-4114
Share on other sites

you think ed is bad,i went to calais last weekend to fill up the old cellar,you could hardly place your feet for the amount of dog crap on the ground and that was in the town centre.i know ed is hardly crap free but compared to calais it was nothing,it really put me off going back there. by the way first time on the shuttle fantastic,knocks spots off the ferry.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229-dog-excrement/#findComment-4526
Share on other sites

Was having a stroll in Dulwich park on Sat, and a group of chav's (smoking spliffs) were wondering around with a mean looking staff terrier type of thing.... Anyway it decided to lay a cable on the park and they just walked off and left it there! I didn't say anything though, as they looked quit mean, and I didn't want to get my head kicked in.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229-dog-excrement/#findComment-4682
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...