Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi. I was diagnosed with a mild cyctocele prolapse (uterine) some time in 2015. Was referred to King's College and had a women's group session where they basically told you to do pelvic floor exercises for the rest of your life.

I had my first child in 2012 and I am currently pregnant(6 and a half months). At the start of my pregnancy I did express concern to my GP regarding the prolapse and giving birth but she said it wouldn't be a problem.

I have taken a look at it today in the mirror and it appears to be pushed out a lot more further than it was before. I don't have any problems with leaking urine, but I am really concerned that I won't be able to give birth naturally. I am still working and actually wonder if it is now time to stop and take care of myself as I work with toddlers and it's very physical. I will see my GP on Monday and I also have a midwife appointment at the end of the month, but until then I just wanted to know if anyone has had a similar experience and was able to give birth. Thank you.

Hi Buttercup,


Congratulations on your pregnancy. I have not (knowingly) given birth with a prolapse. However, after having two vaginal births I ended up with two moderate prolapses which needed to be repaired surgically. If you are experiencing any change in the prolapse it might be useful to ask for a referral to a consultant to discuss this. You may also want to try asking on Mumsnet/Netmums/and I believe there is a large Facebook group for women with prolapses. I appreciate your desire for a natural birth as I felt the same way, but having been in my situation I can assure you that it may not be worth the risk.


Please feel free to PM me if you want to talk further about this.


Take care.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another recommendation - excellent, fast work. 
    • I appealed against a fine issued by Southwark, and won. The adjudicator was businesslike, but also mentioned that several cases had come to him caught out by the same confusing signage.    Is there any other parking that could reasonably have been used? Does the shop advise where to park?  It sounds as though the time in the bay was a reasonable use. Even if you lose, I doubt that Southwark can increase the original charge. If you are going to appeal, don't delay. Take pictures of the scene if you think that might help, also provide the weight of the goods if that supports your case.
    • Thanks - an overnight stay,  a drip and painkillers seems to have done its work!
    • Depends on who can afford to purchase or lease it and what The Dulwich Estate, Stonegate and Southwark Council will allow to be built or operate on the site. Whatever it is, it needs to attract footfall for itself and businesses around it. The question to ask is what does that part of Dulwich need, that is not within the locality, which will attract custom and footfall, that the site can accommodate and that can offer parking which it already has available. In between Cox's Walk, Dulwich Village, Dulwich College and the park, some sort of establishment that sells drinks and meals. Bit then I'm just chucking ideas around, or maybe someone, Dean, has some radical idea's to take it in a totally different direction.    Whatever it becomes it has to be better than the rotting site and eyesore it currently is. Good luck to anyone who takes on the project to redevelop the former Grove Tavern. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...