Jump to content

Dawsons Hill

EDNate

By EDNate
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

EDNate

EDNate

Posted
Posted

My partner was just walking our golden retriever up Dawsons hill, and was told by someone coming down that there are people taking photos on the hill to fine people 100? if walking their dogs off the lead.


Is this an existing or new rule ? If an existing rule has anyone encountered these dog police before? I imagine them jumping out of bushes with huge camera lenses or sitting on top of the Dawsons estate snapping with sniper lenses.


We have lived in the area for one year. I don't know if I have unknowingly been playing fetch "illegally" or there is a new rule, but this saddens me as one of my favorite things to do is play fetch with our dog up there.


I know there are irresponsible owners and dangerous dogs out there, but it seems sad that responsible dog owners with statistically harmless breeds should lose out on a beautiful local public space financed by our extortionate council tax.


Thoughts ? (p.s. I mean no offence to anyone that has had bad experiences with off the lead dogs, I have been a victim myself in years past)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/227764-dawsons-hill/
Share on other sites
Frankito

Frankito

Posted
Posted

That?s probably more a minority than you think but thanks anyway for tarring us all with the same brush.... ;0)



Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Might also be because so many dog

> keepers round here don't train their animals are

> quite happy to let them shit anywhere and

> everywhere and attack anything going.

Maybaby

Maybaby

Posted
Posted

Are you one of them? Last I checked, "so many" didn't mean every one.


There are too many dog owners (and people in general) in London. Unfortunately that means there will be more problems as people are less reponsible and respectful. It's a shame, however, those inconsiderate dog owners don't add much to the general image of dog owners.


Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That?s probably more a minority than you think but

> thanks anyway for tarring us all with the same

> brush.... ;0)

>

>

> Abe_froeman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Might also be because so many dog

> > keepers round here don't train their animals

> are

> > quite happy to let them shit anywhere and

> > everywhere and attack anything going.

Frankito

Frankito

Posted
Posted

Thanks so much for jumping in and clarifying, kindly send me the lottery numbers for this weekend too please..


I must remember not to be sarcastic at exaggerated statements going forward.



Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you one of them? Last I checked, "so many"

> didn't mean every one.

>

> There are too many dog owners (and people in

> general) in London. Unfortunately that means there

> will be more problems as people are less

> reponsible and respectful. It's a shame, however,

> those inconsiderate dog owners don't add much to

> the general image of dog owners.

>

> Frankito Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That?s probably more a minority than you think

> but

> > thanks anyway for tarring us all with the same

> > brush.... ;0)

> >

> >

> > Abe_froeman Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Might also be because so many dog

> > > keepers round here don't train their animals

> > are

> > > quite happy to let them shit anywhere and

> > > everywhere and attack anything going.

EDNate

EDNate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "clear up your dog's mess and keep them on a

> lead"

>

> https://www.southwark.gov.uk/parks-and-open-spaces

> /parks/dawson-s-hill



I'd not seen that page before, thanks for the reference. The following comment is directed at the rule, and not yourself.


While the page clears up my question regarding the rule, I think this is a huge shame. A nature reserve should be enjoyed by local families and their pets. If the dog is not on the dangerous dogs list and is a family pet, my kid should be able to play fetch with her in our local public park. Certainly not as if Dawsons hill has landscaped gardens dogs could ruin.



On the dog mess point..... I'm not sure I agree with the assumption that a dog being on a lead prevents an irresponsible dog owner ( not me - always have pickup bags) to start picking up the mess. If they don't care and the dogs gotta go, then the lead won't change anything.

Jules-and-Boo

Jules-and-Boo

Posted
Posted

I would have thought there would need to be signs informing you to keep your dog on a lead.


What the hell are they going to do with photos anyway? If we can show the police photos / videos of someone breaking into our homes/ cars etc and they say it's not enough evidence, how can the same be used against a dog walker?


How do they know who you are/ that the dog is your dog/ where to live to fine you?

EDNate

EDNate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would have thought there would need to be signs

> informing you to keep your dog on a lead.

>

> What the hell are they going to do with photos

> anyway? If we can show the police photos / videos

> of someone breaking into our homes/ cars etc and

> they say it's not enough evidence, how can the

> same be used against a dog walker?

>

> How do they know who you are/ that the dog is your

> dog/ where to live to fine you?



I think there might be signs at the very bottom of the hill, but they are all over Dulwich Park as well, and few dog owners follow the rule there.


I would react to any "dog enforcement officer" with exactly those questions. It's not as if my little fluff ball has a registration number so I am a bit confused as to what these bozo's with cameras would do.


Anyone who has been confronted by them please share your story !

AylwardS

AylwardS

Posted
Posted

I had a quick look at the Council website this morning. There may be more useful information the links as well as what Abe Freeman posted.


Southwark carried out a consultation about dog Anti Social Behaviour (ASB) and it looks like they are stepping up enforcement - signs have gone up in a couple of parks / green spaces near us limiting walking of a maximum of 6 dogs with 3 off the lead at any one time.


We all know there are good and bad dog owners and the rules have to apply to all. A number of the links on the website page about Responsible Dog Ownership don?t work but might be worth a look https://www.southwark.gov.uk/environment/animal-welfare/responsible-dog-ownership - some common sense / good owner behaviour but unfortunately not all owners are good.


The bylaws relating to dogs have been around a while - looks like they were last confirmed in 1975!

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/2229/composite_dog_ban_byelaws.pdf


As has been said Dawsons Hill is a nature reserve and the rules are what they are. Wildlife doesn?t know one bit of green is a nature reserve and another isn?t so at this time of year it would be good if dog walkers could be aware that disturbance, even unintentional can be an issue for wildlife - not something we thought about when we had dogs while I was growing up to be honest but we live and learn.


If you are taking your dog out please keep them on a lead - they may be well behaved and not mean it but could unintentionally scare nesting birds (now until July) and cause them to abandon their nest / chicks. If you are walking in the country the dog may encounter animals its not used to and react out of character. Its just not worth the risk of it getting hurt or worst case shot - not an issue here but traffic is the equivalent here I guess.

BoroWyke

BoroWyke

Posted
Posted

I took my dog up there yesterday. The signs do ask you to put your dog on a lead if instructed but there is no instruction to always have them on a lead. I've just moved onto the area so did not know the area was a nature park.


I'll keep my dog on a lead to be safe. But if a officer tries to fine you, you should challenge them to identify the signs that notify you of the rule. Like a beach, footpaths into an area should notify you of the rules.

EDNate

EDNate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

BoroWyke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I took my dog up there yesterday. The signs do ask

> you to put your dog on a lead if instructed but

> there is no instruction to always have them on a

> lead. I've just moved onto the area so did not

> know the area was a nature park.

>

> I'll keep my dog on a lead to be safe. But if a

> officer tries to fine you, you should challenge

> them to identify the signs that notify you of the

> rule. Like a beach, footpaths into an area should

> notify you of the rules.


I think that's the right approach. I will keep mine off the lead unless instructed otherwise, until the signs have changed.

EDNate

EDNate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

AylwardS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had a quick look at the Council website this

> morning. There may be more useful information the

> links as well as what Abe Freeman posted.

>

> Southwark carried out a consultation about dog

> Anti Social Behaviour (ASB) and it looks like they

> are stepping up enforcement - signs have gone up

> in a couple of parks / green spaces near us

> limiting walking of a maximum of 6 dogs with 3 off

> the lead at any one time.

>

> We all know there are good and bad dog owners and

> the rules have to apply to all. A number of the

> links on the website page about Responsible Dog

> Ownership don?t work but might be worth a look

> https://www.southwark.gov.uk/environment/animal-we

> lfare/responsible-dog-ownership - some common

> sense / good owner behaviour but unfortunately not

> all owners are good.

>

> The bylaws relating to dogs have been around a

> while - looks like they were last confirmed in

> 1975!

>

> https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/2229/co

> mposite_dog_ban_byelaws.pdf

>

> As has been said Dawsons Hill is a nature reserve

> and the rules are what they are. Wildlife doesn?t

> know one bit of green is a nature reserve and

> another isn?t so at this time of year it would be

> good if dog walkers could be aware that

> disturbance, even unintentional can be an issue

> for wildlife - not something we thought about when

> we had dogs while I was growing up to be honest

> but we live and learn.

>

> If you are taking your dog out please keep them on

> a lead - they may be well behaved and not mean it

> but could unintentionally scare nesting birds (now

> until July) and cause them to abandon their nest /

> chicks. If you are walking in the country the dog

> may encounter animals its not used to and react

> out of character. Its just not worth the risk of

> it getting hurt or worst case shot - not an issue

> here but traffic is the equivalent here I guess.


Thanks for the feedback and posting those helpful references, I was unaware of this guidance.


I strongly but respectfully disagree with your statement that dogs can unintentionally scare off nesting birds and pose a threat to wildlife. If the birds are at ground level, then the local foxes and roaming outdoor cats are much more of a threat than my little fur ball ! Perhaps there is more to the story though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By malumbu · Posted

      If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • Rockets
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By Rockets · Posted

      And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
    • SpringTime
      Do others hear the lady singing, in her home at the top end of Copleston Road?

      By SpringTime · Posted

      Funerals, for example.
    • vladi
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By vladi · Posted

      I look to the future and clearly see that the law of unintended consequences will apply with a vengeance and come 2029 Labour will voted out of office. As someone once said 'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...