Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, have you looked up your ancestors or your house in ED? Has anyone found anything interesting?


We looked up the censuses to 1911 and discovered that our house was lived in by a small Edwardian/Victorian family, parents in law and a cook and kitchen maid. Quite astonishing given the size of it. The children were stated to be "scholars" which I now gather means "at school" and the head of the household was the manager in a factory. He had been born in Jamaica - we traced his name backwards - and then came here to SE London. It is quite eerie to walk downstairs holding the bannister, feeling where it has been worn smooth by the touch of the people I'm researching.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22776-genealogy-and-house-history/
Share on other sites

I went to an open day at our local church a few years ago. Found out our house in North Dulwich was first occupied by a soldier and then a policeman and his family. Think they were one and the same as the houses were built as part of the 'homes for heroes' after the First World War. The whole estate was built in the 1920s.


Many soldiers went on to be policeman (my grandad was a Port of London Authority constable) but wasn't fortunate enough to live in North Dulwich then!


I've been tracing my family tree on and off for the past 25 years. Pre 1911 census returns also have the end column which state whether the person was 'deaf, blind, imbecile or lunatic'!

I have done my research of the family tree back to Ireland and the Potato Famine when the ancestors moved to Southwark.

I have noticed that my dad was born in 1884, that is 128 years ago, just think if he were still alive he would be one hundred and twenty six years old, I was born when he was 47 and my 81 years make 128.

Good news my Zimmer passed it's MOT, just got a warning that the rubber feet were wearing thin, and the bell sounds a bit squeeky.

I'm always complaining how small my flat is. I just looked it up on the 1911 census and discovered 10 people living in the property (described on census as a 4 room house) they would have had the whole house but that is still not very big!


They managed to fit in a family of 8, an elderly boarder and a lodger.


Perhaps I should stop moaning about lack of space.


Had such fun researching, really recommend doing this!

Also just found a lot of interesting reminiscing going on on the Dulwich site with a lady called beryl and a man called mike posting some really fascinating and personal stories, most of which led me to be thankful for running water and central heating. Oh forumites, never complain your bathroom is out of date again!

Single family of 5 lived in our house in 1911 (3 bed terrace). Father an ambulance driver, eldest son a milk boy. The eldest was born in Constance Road, the middle in Nutfield Road, and the youngest in Lacon Road.


Fast forward 100 years and there's a family of 3 living there and we're bursting at the seams. Time for a clear out I think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...