Jump to content

Recommended Posts



You should realise that it is a breach of someone's human rights to ask them to interrupt a mobile phone call in order that you can have a conversation with them. The person deprived of their phone call can claim damages under the Human Rights Act.


What's all this nonsense about the LL PO being busy being used by all the middle classes? Whenever I go there, there are plenty of people who don't appear to fit into the "middle class" category.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it should be a given that customers who

> need to fill out forms should stand aside to do

> it. I use the PO a lot and I arrive with my

> envelopes ready to be scanned. I literally only

> take seconds at the counter. If you need to fill

> out a form, borrow a pen, finish selotaping your

> package, or anything else that does not require

> staff input, then stand aside and let someone else


Good girl giggirl erm, anyway - absolutely spot on - be prepared, bring sellotape and a pen. been using it since way back when, and always exchage pleasentries. They are human beings behind the counter as well... and as for the phone thing - the height of rudeness.

> be served. It's soul destroying to watch staff

> staring into space whilst waiting for customers to

> get ready to be served.

>

> Don't get me started on people who are on their

> phones at the counter; that's rude to the staff

> serving them and to the people waiting.

>

> The staff at Lordship Lane are good people doing

> their best. It's not their place to say "oh it's

> busy today I won't take a break". That's the thin

> end of the wedge. They have to eat and they have

> errands to run, just like everyone else.

Designerjooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Attention Razors: I was sending a box of

> chocolates and a card to my father in New Zealand

> for his birthday. Yeah - I'm so middle-class for

> doing that! The horror!

> Grow up and try to get that chip off your

> shoulder. Life is better when your happy.

. . . . . . . .

Sending a box of chocolates half way around the world-thats the type of thing that probably held up the original poster in queue-try reading and undestanding the OP b4 popping. Did the chocs melt i wonder. .

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Razors Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What does everyone expect- LL PO is very busy

> with the middle classes sending all kinds of tat

> over

> > the world to their middle class pals, and it is

> they who clog up the PO.

>

> I wish you would PO...

. . . . . . . . . . .

Well if yot are happy to queue then don't complain about the staff,and put the OP right.

What GigGirl said.

If the middle classes are keeping the postal service going (and clogging up LL post office as a side effect) then hats off to them. I gave up on the Royal Mail years ago. All the chocs I send to New Zealand relatives originate from New Zealand chocolate shops. That's the beauty of the internet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...