Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello fellow ED friends,


Would anyone be able to give some advise on this matter.


We (housemates and I) have just received an extortionate bill from our landlord as there was a fault with our boiler. We wish to contest this we feel that it is unfair for a number of reasons (mainly being that it isn?t stated on our contract that we would have to pay for things like this) but not 100% sure where we stand with it all.


If anyone has been through a similar situation, is a landlord, tenant, estate agent and could help that would be really appreciated.


Best

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> See this from Shelter - might help:

> https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/repa

> irs/landlord_and_tenant_responsibilities_for_repai

> rs

>

> Lists what landlords are responsible for -

> whatever they might say in any contract ...


You can also get free one-to-one advice from Shelter by email through the website. Also, if you have free legal advice attached to Contents Insurance/professional membership/union it would be worth having a chat.


Although boilers come under landlord's responsabilities, if he is being problematic it is worth the time to get some free legal advice.

If you caused damage to the boiler somehow, the landlord could have a claim on the cost. If your contract has provision for this kind of expense, then perhaps he has a claim that way. If the landlord offered one kind of fix but you insisted on some particular fancy boiler instead, he would doubtless want to be compensated for the difference.


The first of these seems unlikely. You?ve already said the second doesn?t apply. Presumably the third doesn?t apply either, and if it did then something should have been agreed beforehand. Assuming all that, the landlord has to cover the expense of maintaining his property, including fixing the boiler and anything else he provides as part of the contract.


So, just politely write a reply that the boiler replacement is not an expense that you?re responsible for. Confirm you?ll continue to pay the rent as agreed (I?m assuming you haven?t been withholding and that there?s no other rent dispute), and for the avoidance of doubt remind him that he will not be permitted to withhold any part of the deposit to cover the boiler or other normal maintenance costs.


Keep a copy to show the deposit escrow people when he tries to hold back your deposit at the end of the tenancy.


I?ve been a landlord. I?ve paid a lot in boiler maintenance. Wouldn?t dream of charging a tenant for that, unless they had been mucking about with the heating system and broken it!

Its pretty hard to cause deliberate damage to a boiler, unless you take a hammer to it, so tell your landlord to get stuffed- they are responsible for repairs and if necessary replacement of a boiler that develops a fault.


Also, make sure you find somewhere else to live once the contract is up, as it sounds to me that a landlord even trying to make tenants pay for a faulty boiler is shady, illegal business and you wont want him as your landlord in future anyway.

I actually turned my combi boiler up to high heat for water (probably not a good idea but it's not really abuse of it) and the next check showed some of the insulation on the door had melted.


Gas Engineer didn't seem that bothered but suggested I replace it by next year - ?120

Humdinger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its pretty hard to cause deliberate damage to a

> boiler, unless you take a hammer to it, so tell

> your landlord to get stuffed- they are responsible

> for repairs and if necessary replacement of a

> boiler that develops a fault.

>

> Also, make sure you find somewhere else to live

> once the contract is up, as it sounds to me that a

> landlord even trying to make tenants pay for a

> faulty boiler is shady, illegal business and you

> wont want him as your landlord in future anyway.


Agree - trouble...

EPB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The agent who manages my small provincial house

> deals with (and sends me the bills for) repairs to

> things like boiler/cooker/washing machine/fridge

> etc.

Exactly..the tenants pay for replacing nothing that was in the property when they moved in

you can simply refuse to pay the bill. The landlord fixing and spending money on repairing the boiler (unless broken by the tenant(s)) falls under the landlord?s repairing obligation outlined in s11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.


If this trundles on, the landlord could seek a money judgement, which you can defend through the civil courts/MCOL procedure.


The landlord may also seek to recover this from the deposit, which you could then challenge via the nominated alternative dispute resolution service of the deposit scheme being used for the tenancy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...