Jump to content

Recommended Posts

More honesty on our Brexit plight in a 15-min #R4today interview with Dutch PM Mark Rutte than we will hear in a 6-week Tory leadership contest


He?s clearly better qualified for No 10 than any of the candidates!


If only our own politicians treated the public like grown-ups and had an honest conversation about the realities of Brexit. Even Rory Stewart trying to play the honesty card had his own unicorn of saying he would get May's deal through parliament.

As much as I dislike him, a part of me will be pleased when Johnson becomes PM, as he will finally have to own and deal with the clusterfuck he's created, and hopefully it will see him kicked out on his lying backside in 6 months time...

Interesting editorial from the Evening Standard...


Mr Johnson is the candidate who has the most room for manoeuvre to get the country out of the Brexit mess.


That may seem a paradox, as the one who helped get us into that mess, and who again today says he wants ?to get Brexit done by October 31?.


But he is careful not to ?guarantee? that date ? Mr Johnson may be loose with words when it comes to the fates of others but never when it comes to his own.


Ask yourself which of these potential prime ministers is most likely to persuade the Conservative party to vote for a repacked version of the existing deal? The one with the greatest credibility with hard Brexiteers.


Indeed, which of these possible leaders could you imagine making the even bigger leap and asking the country again for its views?


The candidate who first came up with the idea of two referendums back in early 2016. Of course, he denies all this ? and, like the other candidates, promises to get a renegotiated withdrawal agreement out of the EU.


Perhaps he will. Most likely he will not. But one thing is for sure, having finally arrived in Downing Street, Mr Johnson won?t be in a hurry to leave it. Opportunism knocks.

JohnL - totally agree.


I don't trust BORIS or Corbyn, they both spout equal measures of crap and neither can be trusted as far as you can throw them. Boris lies, blusters, makes things up on the spot and changes things as he likes. Both will be just as bad as each other and bad for the country. The sooner we can move on and have new blood running the Government IMO the better. Would the last person turn off the lights and close the door. Perhaps the Royals would like to step forward, dissolve Parliament and take control, surely they couldn't make more of a mess than the current three year fiasco we've endured so far and are likely to suffer for for the foreseeable future.

"The sooner we can move on and have new blood running the Government IMO the better."


I agree but I fear that "new blood" may be Nigel Farage who seems to be ever gaining in popularity because the electorate are seeking new blood. It's happened in the US. I'm feeling nauseous as I type this but BJ is preferable.

Hunt visits a business which employs 350 people. It has 50% of the EU market. A no deal Brexit with 10% tariffs would put it out of business. Was I hearing things when I though he said it would be worth it? What sort of fucked up logic requires a remainer MP prove how pro leave he now is by saying that? This bloody country is politically seriously ill.

Who gives a shit about where he hangs out,his parking tickets or how many posters are on his car? This imbecile is likely to dictate the future of this country. And it won't be a good outcome as he's not qualified for the job.


ETA


No offence intended to you JohnL. Just annoyed about BJ. There's a theory that the event was actually a distraction a la Trump, to avoid actually having to having explain away policies that can't work.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who gives a shit about where he hangs out,his

> parking tickets or how many posters are on his

> car? This imbecile is likely to dictate the future

> of this country. And it won't be a good outcome as

> he's not qualified for the job.

>

> ETA

>

> No offence intended to you JohnL. Just annoyed

> about BJ. There's a theory that the event was

> actually a distraction a la Trump, to avoid

> actually having to having explain away policies

> that can't work.


No offense taken and that could easily be true :).


In his way Hunt is as bad as he recognises the problem where due to a no deal a large number of people could lose their job and says so and then says he might have to do it anyway.

What Hunt said was unbelievable. Even if it if likely to happen, does any politician say out loud specific people will lose their jobs because of tariffs and that democracy comes first? Has he an ulterior motive or is the country just madder than I thought?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River. When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...