Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A planning application has just been lodged to put 3 more 6 meter high masts on top of Mundania Court (corner of Mundania Road and Forest Hill Road)


The existing building roof is approx 13m above ground. These, at 6.6m tall will be half as tall again. This height and their position tight against the side of the building and will loom over Mundania Road, Forest Hill Road and all the surrounding houses.


There are other reasons why you may well want to object to this development.


The application number is 19/AP/1195 and the case officer is Michael Gozo. You can see the (very poor quality) drawings on the Southwark Council Planning Database


If you want to comment on the proposals you can do so at the link below

https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9582775


Don't believe it if the page says there are no public comments.....there are, they just try not to publicize it.


If you do comment, I would be grateful if you could let me know either by commenting on this thread or by copying the confirmation email to me at [email protected]

It is for 5G.

My objection is the size and location on the masts, their visual impact on the surrounding neighbourhood and the adjacent listed church and their impact on the amenity of the residents of Mundania Court. We already have noise nuisance issues from the existing equipment (wind noise and mechanical noise from the air-con plant) and this will only increase it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...