Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm struggling to work out what the total outgoings per month would be to employ a nanny full time in London, ie how to work out what tax, NI, pension etc come to on top of the hourly rate.


I'm going back to work in 10 months and will have a 10 month old and 3 year old. Nursery quote for both is about ?3000/month (including the 30 free hours to which 3yo will be entitled). If I could afford a nanny for that money per month I think it would make life much nicer - I could ask her to take 3yo to the very nice state nursery school for thee hours every morning which would be covered by 30hours (she already has a place) so she still gets stimulation of a school setting and little one has more focussed care.


But I'm struggling to work out total costs. ?3000/month would be very painful but keen to spend it in the best way! If we went down the nanny route and she came 7am-6.30pm I could also work compressed hours 4 days a week and be on full salary, and only need to pay for four days.


Very grateful for help with an idea of whether a nanny is totally out of my price range! Thank you.

Hi,


Use this free calculator to see how much you can afford to pay. For different monthly salaries (gross or net) the calculator breaks down the total employment costs including employer NIC and pension obligations.


By my quick analysis can roughly afford to pay just under ?15 per hour gross / just over ?11 net per hour. Nannies often think in net hourly wages rather than gross salary.


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,2031173

Most day nannies in our area expect ?12 - ?15 per hour.


At the lower end of the scale that would be about ?3,500 a month gross rising from there.


If you could get someone for ?11 an hour (net) you should be set but I never interviewed anyone who would go that low and I was interviewing a few years back.

  • 3 months later...

I?m s nanny . But just a little advice for you .. have you tried advertising nanny with own child ? I?ve just finished my nanny position as I?m studying now so I don?t nanny anymore. But I used to take my child to work with me for ?10 per hour as a reduced rate ..

I think ?3,000 per month full time is a lot of money to pay ..

When I used to nanny in Dulwich I used to charge ?9 per hour . Rates have clearly gone up ..

Anyway just thought I?d give you advice. Maybe Childmnder and Nursery?? Good luck. Xxxx

  • 2 weeks later...
If you have space you could have someone live in for less than the ?3k per month all in. That's the route we went down (nanny, not au pair) - we were worried about lack of privacy but it's actually been lovely having someone young and fun living in the house.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I look to the future and clearly see that the law of unintended consequences will apply with a vengeance and come 2029 Labour will voted out of office. As someone once said 'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. 
    • Labour seems to be taxing the many to get to the few in so many policies they have implemented. Look at the farmer situation: yes there are some rich farmers but the vast majority are not and they are, in my mind, the very definition of a working person - the very people this country relies upon. Most are family businesses. They were re-running some of the Simon Reeves programmes on the Lake District and it was filmed just after Covid but they featured an 18 year old farmer who was took over his parents farm after they both died of cancer within months of each other. He and his school friends were mucking in to keep the farm going and continue the family business. Today, he would have been hit by a big tax bill too. The challenge is Rachel Reeves' budget desperately needs growth and with the news today that the economy barely grew on, ostensibly, fears of what the budget was going to hit people with and the fact post budget many businesses are saying costs will have to go up due to the increases in employee NI but at the same time saying wage growth, and even jobs, will be impacted we may be heading towards a very nasty perfect storm. Public services desperately need reform not just more money. Wes Streeting said that reform was needed in the NHS and he was talking in a manner more akin to a Tory health secretary than a Labour one!
    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...