Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you've been tacitly accused of this, can you provide me with a non-confrontational retort to the legions of ill-informed morons who don't see how much offence can be caused by saying that what I actually do for a living doesn't justify my salary? Experience reminds me that it's nearly always those who have a history of working for the public sector that level this kind of underhand accusation.


I work for a high street bank and in doing so I put in an excess of 60 hours a week.I put in the effort and overcame all the trepidation that comes with getting a degree and got myself a job immediately after leaving university. I may work for a bank where the majority shareholders are the taxpayer; but that doesn't give someone the right, regardless of how much tax they pay, the right to scold me for earning a six figure income. To have some lefty entitlement case - who nearly always earns significantly less than those in my position - cast unfounded doubt over whether what I do for a living justifies my wage is galling to say the least. I don't "earn too much". My value my is directly proportional to what my employers pay me. So suck it, losers. Not you charming folk of ED. Just the ignorant serfs who I look down upon. Bwahahahaha

Yeah, I'm such a 'loser' that I own my own house and can afford to send my kids to a private school. Unlike some around here who struggle to pay the mortgage and hinder their kids from childhood by shoving them off to the local comp where they'll rub shoulder with all the free dinner cases whose parents don't take any interest in their education or how disruptive they are. Loser? Dream on.


I bet you all wish you shopped at Waitrose when you're fretting over the receipt from Iceland.

You should've been there when I drove past Harris Girls' school the other day. One young lady's PE kit looked like it's been in the family for generations. I pity the poor fool who's repaid with tales of drug dealing and gang violence after sending their daughter there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's all go, a Friday night match and midweek games. Week 24 fixtures...   Friday 27th February Wolverhampton Wanderers v Aston Villa   Saturday 28th February AFC Bournemouth v Sunderland Burnley v Brentford Liverpool v West Ham United Newcastle United v Everton Leeds United v Manchester City   Sunday 1st March Brighton & Hove Albion v Nottingham Forest Fulham v Tottenham Hotspur Manchester United v Crystal Palace Arsenal v Chelsea   Tuesday 3rd March AFC Bournemouth v Brentford Everton v Burnley Leeds United v Sunderland Wolverhampton Wanderers v Liverpool   Wednesday 4th March Aston Villa v Chelsea Brighton & Hove Albion v Arsenal Fulham v West Ham United Manchester City v Nottingham Forest Newcastle United v Manchester United    Thursday 5th March Tottenham Hotspur v Crystal Palace
    • This is precisely why the government should impose the fines and order the work. It's a disgrace.
    • I am the original person who posted this post ! I said a pedestrian crossing as in where people cross at the coop  I should have said Lordship lane ( my mistake ) !
    • I think it's in a pretty dangerous position, so amazed the Police or parking authorities haven't removed it. It's illegal to park on the zigzag markings by a crossing and for very good reasons, so actually being in the middle of the crossing is far worse...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...