Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, you just vote for a party - it's the same everywhere in fact. So Remainers need to avoid Labour as some of their candidates are Brexit favouring.

It is a choice between Green, Lib Dems and Change.

Lib Dems are ahead in the polls, so a vote for either of the others will split the remain vote.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> E.U. Rules once again stipulates that the U.K has

> to take part.


Yep, holding democratic elections really sucks. Of course no one forces the various parties to partake in them, they choose to do so of their own free will, just like our own general/council elections.



> It will cost the U.K. ? Millions ++ which is a

> total waste of money.


A drop in the ocean compared to the ?600m a week Brexit has so far cost the county.



> The U.K. WILL be leaving the E.U eventually and

> elected MEP's will be defunct.


I'm afraid your 'will' needs to be replaced with 'might' until there is a parliamentary consensus for passing the agreed WA. Changing the PM won't change the WA or the maths of Parliament, and no Tory leader in their right mind would call a general election, so under the Fixed Term Parliament Act it's more likely that this impasse will drag on until 2021, when we're looking at another hung parliament probably with a Labour Gov, and they will only be able to strike a deal with Remain supporting parties, and we all know what they will insist on. The big delicious irony of all this is that it's been Brexit MPs that have actually stopped us from leaving...

Three years on and I am still looking for a persuasive argument to leave. Yes we have done this to death but please do remind me Keano and DF on why (beyond the let's put our hands up in the playground). There are many many concerns with the EU but none strong enough that has yet to change my mind.


Comparing it with some sport/entertainment is just superficial.

To continue the football analogy with Leaver logic (i?ll Do a ?sic? as well), there won?t be a next season as City have won and that is the end of it. And of course if a financial fair play tribunal were to rule City?s spending had broken the rules there would be no debate as it would upset the victors.

Oh and disliking the 'political classes' 'liberal elite' etc isn't a reason. I often find them/me annoying, pompous etc which is a good argument for taking the p a little. Not f the country up.


Hands up all those people who would bring back hanging


Hands up all those people who would repatriate foreigners.


Don't leave that up to referendums. Let's stick to representational democracy no matter how clunky.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> To use some Remainer logic (sic) if Man City and

> Liverpool both win tomorrow and City get 98 points

> to Liverpool?s 97, City should not be crowned

> Champions because of the narrow majority and

> because Liverpool fans won?t like the result.


Remainers don't want a second referendum because it was a close win for Leave, many including myself would've accepted a Brexit that reflected the closeness of the vote, i.e. a soft Brexit. But Brexiters became greedy, totally ignored Remainers and proceeded to shift the goalposts towards a hard Brexit/No Deal. Neither of these were what was offered by the Leave campaign. We were told there would be a deal, that we would be no worse off than we are in the EU, that the NHS would get ?350m/week, that Brexit would reduce immigration etc etc etc. Then there's the whole issue of the Irish border and Good Friday Agreement which was conveniently swept under the carpet during the campaign and ignored until the 11th hour during negotiations. Brexiters have had 3 years to come up with a consensus and have failed miserably, they promised something that has proved to be undeliverable, and in the process have shown themselves to be nothing but a bunch of charlatans and snake oil salesmen. That's why Remainers, and some Leave voters, now want a second referendum...

I understand your views are sincerely held DR.


However the Brexit divide is becoming irrelevant as the debate has now morphed into one questioning the very nature of democracy in this country and the suitability of our institutions. A second referendum will only add fuel to the fire. Let?s hope it doesn?t become a firestorm.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand your views are sincerely held DR.

>

> However the Brexit divide is becoming irrelevant

> as the debate has now morphed into one questioning

> the very nature of democracy in this country and

> the suitability of our institutions. A second

> referendum will only add fuel to the fire. Let?s

> hope it doesn?t become a firestorm.


As I said earlier, we could've left the EU by now and therefore honoured the referendum result, were it not for the hardline Breziters. It all rings rather hollow hearing Brexiters say that democracy hasn't been upheld when Brexiters have voted down a deal to leave the EU...

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Farage currently has more points than labour and

> Tories.


Only according to one poll, whereas this poll has BP and Labour quite close and is more in keeping with recent polls, which suggests the BP 'surge poll' is an outlier...


European Parliament voting intention:


BREX: 27% (-1)

LAB: 25% (-1)

LDEM: 14% (+3)

CON: 13% (-1)

GRN: 8% (+2)

CHUK: 6% (-2)

UKIP: 3% (+1)


via @ComRes, 09 May

Chgs. w/ 07 May

DR said:


?As I said earlier, we could've left the EU by now and therefore honoured the referendum result, were it not for the hardline Breziters. It all rings rather hollow hearing Brexiters say that democracy hasn't been upheld when Brexiters have voted down a deal to leave the EU...?


Half-in-half-out with Northern Ireland sold down the swanny wasn?t my idea of Brexit. To return to my football analogy, it?s a bit like telling Man City and Liverpool they can only ever draw with teams.

Actually keano NI wasn't being sold down the swanny. If its special status was accepted then it would have found itself in a unique position which could only benefit its economy. It voted to Remain, remember. It's only the DUP who scuppered that. They're the ones who want to maintain the Union and not be treated differently to anywhere else in the UK. But only when it suits them.


You highlighted the main problem with Brexit in your last post. Your 'idea of Brexit'. It's because there is no one idea of Brexit that it has failed and will continue to do so. There will be no agreement. Just more can kicking until October and beyond.


What was it you wanted Brexit for anyway?

I have always voted Labour. Until recently I was a party member (I have left the party over their Brexit stance). I will be voting Lib Dem and strongly urge previous Labour supporting Remainers to do the same. As things stand Farage is going to storm the EU elections . We have to send a strong, united anti-brexit message.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 29 points...   Week 29 table...  
    • Cd collections wanted.. bigger the better Cash awaits dm me if you have something that may interest thanks Tim   
    • Hi everyone, we are trying to finslise our decision for enrolling our son for 3+ from September and currently considering Dulwich Prep or Herne Hill. We like both and appreciate there is no right or wrong answer but what we like about HH is great focus on early years and also being coed. However if we can avoid the 7+ stress then prefer to do that. Dulwich Prep is closer but the difference is not significant. we know children are very active and busy in DP and they have great facilities, but unlike HH, we don’t know much about their focus on personal development and emotional intelligence, etc! Also not sure about long-term impact of being in boys only school. Difficult decision for us and we appreciate feedback from parents if you can share please.    thank you
    • Yeah that was their old policy. Their new policy is to force you to have a water meter and if you refuse they put you on a punitively high tariff which effectively forces you to have one. I was doing well with my policy of polite resistance which was to say yes fine I'll have one fitted but then not actually book an appointment or cancel the appointments they made. But then I was persuaded that it would be much cheaper anyway. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...