Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jelly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @Saffron

>

> Steady on there, 007. The risks outweight the

> positives, and if you "think" that snapping

> ordinary members of the public, however 'shifty'

> they might look, should be done from a distance,

> then you should've said so in the beginning seeing

> as you're the one who suggested such a bizarre

> measure against people who still remain innocent

> of anything except rousing your own suspicions.

> What you're encouraging is a more intrusive

> measure than CCTV, without official sanction. It

> would be against the law and could potentially

> leave you vulnerable to litigation served by an

> aggrieved party who objects to being photographed

> in public by an anxious and/or paranoid

> pedestrian. How would you react if you saw someone

> secretly or "serreptitiously" taking pictures of

> another member of the public who you didn't feel

> threatened by? One can only assume that you'd

> think the worst. Sorry, but the risks do outweigh

> the positives. By quite a lot, in fact.



Come here, jelly, let me take your picture. Muhahahahahahahaha.

But seriously, I have had a stalker. It was many years ago before camera phones were available. If it ever happened to me again, I wouldn't hesitate to get photographic evidence. There is no law about photographing individuals in public in this country. If you've seen someone acting suspiciously towards you on more than one occasion, then it's worth doing something about it. What you chose to do is of course entirely up to you. Doing nothing b/c you're afraid of upsetting an innocent person, or b/c you're afraid of how people will perceive you as being paranoid, ill-mannered, etc is ignoring an opportunity to protect yourself. xx

Ladies and Gents, I get really upset and annoyed when I see these kind of comments from some one that thinks the way mfcjoe does, that kind of person is a Danger to society as much as the man in the park, where is his humanity ? If a women member or male for that matter on this forum is writing about a serious issue like this one its because she truly felt scared and fearfull for her young family, what an heartless person you must be mfcjoe, im wondering if you have any Family yourself ????

All except for you find this incident really disturbing, any decent person would find it very alarming .

Thanks leanne I hope you get the support u need with your ordeal.

As for mfcjoe... Ever heard the saying " What goes around Comes Around ?

  • 3 weeks later...
discovered the Moulin today when walking to the Plough. Le Moulin was ?12.50 for 3 delicious courses compared with ?13 just for a main in the PLough. Great service too, but it doesn't look much from the outside so most people probably walk past it, as I have done many times!

Cas59 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladies and Gents, I get really upset and annoyed

> when I see these kind of comments from some one

> that thinks the way mfcjoe does, that kind of

> person is a Danger to society as much as the man

> in the park, where is his humanity ? If a women

> member or male for that matter on this forum is

> writing about a serious issue like this one its

> because she truly felt scared and fearfull for her

> young family, what an heartless person you must be

> mfcjoe, im wondering if you have any Family

> yourself ????

> All except for you find this incident really

> disturbing, any decent person would find it very

> alarming .

> Thanks leanne I hope you get the support u need

> with your ordeal.

> As for mfcjoe... Ever heard the saying " What goes

> around Comes Around ?


You are nuts, yes i do have kids and they are very street wise. I hope you don't have kids cos with your genetics they will no

doubt be loonies. You are a complete bread and butter, ciao.

You should ring the police if you're concerned or take a photo of him on your mobile but make sure you are not on your own. There may be an innocent reason for this but in this day and age you cannot be too careful. If you are with other you could always confront him.

postboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You should ring the police if you're concerned or take a photo of him on your mobile but make sure

> you are not on your own. There may be an innocent reason for this but in this day and age you cannot

> be too careful. If you are with other you could always confront him.


For what??? Honestly, this is the equivalent of some thug in a boozer going, 'you lookin' at my missus'?


Don't confront people that are not actually doing anything wrong. How would you like it? Let's all go down to the playground next weekend and confront each and every person with children and get them to prove they are theirs. Unless they are carrying documentary proof that they are actually the parents of the children, we could detain them all and call in the police and social services.


You can't be too careful you know...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> postboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You should ring the police if you're concerned

> or take a photo of him on your mobile but make

> sure

> > you are not on your own. There may be an

> innocent reason for this but in this day and age

> you cannot

> > be too careful. If you are with other you could

> always confront him.

>

> For what??? Honestly, this is the equivalent of

> some thug in a boozer going, 'you lookin' at my

> missus'?

>

> Don't confront people that are not actually doing

> anything wrong. How would you like it? Let's all

> go down to the playground next weekend and

> confront each and every person with children and

> get them to prove they are theirs. Unless they are

> carrying documentary proof that they are actually

> the parents of the children, we could detain them

> all and call in the police and social services.

>

> You can't be too careful you know...


Well said Loz.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...