Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am working on a project discussion as follows:


When parents choose an independent senior school for their child what are the key factors that determine their choice?


I assume:

exam results

location/distance from home (including transport options)

facilities

environment (e.g. pastoral care)

subject strengths (eg sport/music etc to suit child))


However I'd be grateful for a true perspective (my child's still a toddler so don't really know!)


What of my assumptions are true for you / most important?


Do you have different key factors, other than what I've mentioned?


Are the factors different in selecting a (private) secondary school from junior/prep?


If you have already decided on private secondary and have a boy and girl, did different factors come into play based on their sex - or do you think it would?


If the issue of transport is important to you, how far away would you be willing to send your child (to day rather than boarding school)


How soon in advance did you seriously start thinking about independent secondary school options for your child(ren)?


I know this is a big ask so any answer you can give, however brief, is so appreciated:)

Your child is a toddler. Focus on enjoying her, encourge her to explore the world, facilitate her develop her self-confidence and let her wild & lovely toddler curiousity develop in leaps and bounds. Her abilities and passions will help you determine where you want her to go to secondary school. And will help her be a child any school will want to have.

The main reason for many parents is a positive learning environment with strict behaviour codes. This is not to say that these aspects are not available in state schools, but it is more hit and miss in the state sector.


Class disruption in some inner city schools would shock you if you saw it. The whole lesson can be spent disciplining the bad ch and the well behaved who are there to learn miss out. Teachers may well actually be worse in the private sector but their energy is not depleted to the same extent and the net result will often be that they have more to give.

I'm a parent governor of a inner city school in East Dulwich and I also volunteer one morning a week to read twith the children in my son's classroom. Any good inner city school will ensure that behaviour management is high on the agenda - poor behaviour is a barrier to learning for all the children in the classroom. It is true that inner city schools often have a range of abilities and behaviours to manage and integrate in the classroom - this is more challenging for teachers. However, a consistent approach throughout the school can work wonders and personally for me, the benefits of my child learning in such a diverse environment outweighs disadvantages. When I read with the children, I really enjoy reading with some of the children who tend to be the most disruptive. These kids are actually crying out for one-to-one adult attention and when a volunteer like me spends even just 15 minutes reading and talking with them, it makes a big difference to their lives! And they love reading with me too. It is very rewarding!!!


In terms of what to look for in terms of secondary schools, I think you have to take into account your child's interests and personality. I haven't really thought about it too much as my son is just in year 2!!!!

Coach Beth, I totally agree that spending one to one time with the disruptive ch is rewarding to an adult. (Many of my family work as literacy volunteers.) However I'm intrigued as to what the attentive ch learn in the diverse environment that you mention. What good does it do them, other than perhaps to value their education and luck in life, parents, support etc., more than they would otherwise.
Children, like my son, learn to get on with others from different backgrounds and life experiences in diverse social environments. They become friends with children from other backgrounds - they work together and learn together. I feel it has given my son more empathy, respect and understanding of people who are different.
I've been reading about GCSE/A-Levels vs International Baccalaureate. I think the IB is better for several reasons (just my personal assessment, opinions differ), and we will definitely be reviewing the IB route for our daughter in the future. I think some state schools are now offering IB too.
The IB is maybe more challenging in the sense that you don't choose your best subjects, but have to follow a set course, so there will be some subjects you study that aren't your best. Many kids like it though.

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You might be surprised to learn, dear Curmudgeon,

> that well over 50% come from very local postcodes.

> Yes, the catchment areas are wide but the majority

> live locally.



Yes you are right I would be extremely surprised to hear this judging by the huge number of coaches - where do you get this information from?

Hi,

I live in Nunhead and very glad that all this a while off for my year 2 son!

However - I hope to bring some relief!


I work at Deptford Green in Lewisham - a comprehensive, non academy, which will be offering IB and Alevels in its new 6th form next Sep!


We do also have some spaces for Year 7 - althugh Southwark parents seem to be flocking in who were allocated schools they hadn't chosen. Seems lots are in loop holes for schools! Have a look on the website for us - and you can always come and meet the head next Monday.

Ask for me, Anna, when you call.

Thanks, that's very useful. This is all a long way off for us too (daughter is only 2), but the years will go quickly enough I'm sure.


Re the IB, I also read that moderate performance on the IB was considered by British universities to be equivalent to high scores on A Levels. Plus the GCSE/A Level system is not much recognised outside the UK, so IB would be better for students contemplating overseas universities. So much to think about!

It's always useful to speak to the Head and maybe some prospective teachers to find out their attitude and approach. Also useful to know about classroom sizes and after school activities/ provision, ask to see some samples of recent (pupils') work and also ask about their policy of working with children with special educational needs. May also be useful to find out whether music lessons are on offer - some schools loan out musical instruments. This helps you build an overall picture of a school, regardless of which sector, whether state or private.

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You might be surprised to learn, dear Curmudgeon,

> that well over 50% come from very local postcodes.

> Yes, the catchment areas are wide but the majority

> live locally.


>Curmudgeon replied:

>Yes you are right I would be extremely surprised to hear this judging by the huge number of coaches - where do you get >this information from?


"Huge" number of coaches? Alleyn's website mentions a quarter of pupils come in by coach. That means 75% don't.

That do as your answer?

Fair enough, but why do you think they're spurious?


You have to bear in mind that each coach in Townley Road serves Alleyn's AND JAGs, and many also serve DC and DCPS too, which clearly exaggerrates the apparent scale of coaches in the area.


25% would mean about 250 children, but having seen the statistics of which postcodes the pupils live in, the VAST majority are from SE21, Se22, SE5, SE27, SW19, SE23 and SW2 which are all within the immediate locality.

I was having this very conversation yesterday (though with less tension I must say) with someone who works at the school. They told me that they had recently looked into this out of interest - possibly prompted by this thread, I don't know? - and had found that approximately 1/3 of current pupils lived locally (walking distance) another 1/3 lived near but coach/ car/ transport distance (Clapham/ Balham etc.etc.)and the last 1/3 live bloomin' miles away. So 2/3 traveling distance sufficient to need transport.


Seems the website might need updating.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...